User talk:RadicalUranium: Difference between revisions

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Water Babies, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ute and Washoe. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

John Baptiste (Utah grave robber), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Crunchydillpickle🥒 (talk) 12:48, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @RadicalUranium! Thank you so much for this particularly interesting submission... and thanks for the quick barnstar! That made me smile. I made a few copyedits and changed the title from John Baptiste (Utah grave robber) to John Baptiste (grave robber) to be more concise. Your in-line citations were mostly good, from the handful that I checked, but I added a [citation needed] template after one sentence that contained info not in the cited reference. That sort of thing would be a good thing to clean up, especially if you're thinking about nominating the article to the Did You Know section of the main page. Let me know if you have any questions! Crunchydillpickle🥒 (talk) 13:58, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I noticed you're using your userpage to write drafts of articles. Typically people put drafts in their sandbox. Here's one for you: User:RadicalUranium/Sandbox (click it and create the article). If you have multiple drafts or experiments and you'd like to use multiple sandbox pages, you can create links such as User:RadicalUranium/Sandbox/InsertRandomDraftTitle. Crunchydillpickle🥒 (talk) 14:03, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh wow, that is embarrassing, I thought I was using my sandbox, Haha. Thank you so much for letting me know! Also thank you for pointing the incorrect in-line citation out! I will fix that. Thank you for your contributions to human knowledge! RadicalUranium (talk) 14:16, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not be embarrassed! There is so much to learn when you're starting out! Crunchydillpickle🥒 (talk) 16:26, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Utopes was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Legend of Whales in the Great Salt Lake and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 12:11, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RadicalUranium! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Utopes (talk / cont) 12:11, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Legend of Whales in the Great Salt Lake. Thanks! Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 12:58, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Great Salt Lake whale hoax, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

-Samoht27 (talk) 14:46, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Homicide of Nikole Bakoles, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

OhHaiMark (talk) 04:03, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I notice you recently moved the article about the Homicide of Nikole Bakoles to the name Homicide of Nikole Bakoles (Saltair Sally), saying the name was changed for context. Wikipedia has various naming conventions for article titles. Enclosing words in parentheses in a title is normally used to distinguish different article with otherwise identical titles, not provide context. There are also naming conventions about deaths, including how to name articles involving the death of a person. Although not mentioned in these guidelines, the term "Homicide" is consistent with several similar articles, but adding "(Saltair Sally)" to the title is not. Consequently, I have reverted your undiscussed page move. If you disagree with my actions, you are welcome to discuss this at Talk:Homicide of Nikole Bakoles. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 21:51, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That is absolutely okay! Thank you for informing me about this. RadicalUranium (talk) 22:26, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. I also edited the section about Saltair Sally in the article about Great Salt Lake and added a redirect for Saltair Sally that points directly to the article about the Homicide of Nikole Bakoles. These are better ways to provide "context", without renaming an article. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 22:58, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jacob Moritz (brewer). Thanks! Hoary (talk) 03:14, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jacob Moritz (brewer), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hoary (talk) 05:24, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Allen Park (Salt Lake City), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

OhHaiMark (talk) 19:53, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Cassiopeia. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Old Ephraim—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Cassiopeia talk 04:23, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Apologies, but I made a massive copypaste error while adjusting the article and it duplicated sections of my work. I’m attempting to fix it! RadicalUranium (talk) 04:26, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Great Salt Lake whale myth at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ❯❯❯ Mccunicano☕️ 01:06, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Disappeared persons in Utah indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:06, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello RadicalUranium, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Weber County John Doe (1987), should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Weber County John Doe (1987).

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|TheTechnician27}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 20:32, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello RadicalUranium, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Davis County John Doe (2023), should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Davis County John Doe (2023).

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|TheTechnician27}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 20:33, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]