User talk:Winterysteppe: Difference between revisions

Editing Hello! You're editing the userpage of Winterysteppe. Please make your edits friendly.

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present.

Why are you edit warring at the sandbox? The IP is not doing anything wrong (except also edit warring). BethNaught (talk) 19:59, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest, I have no idea why i did that. Winterysteppe (talk) 20:04, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to ask the same question – do you know who the IP is? I blocked them, but will unblock in a minute; the point has been made.  —SMALLJIM  20:08, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No but i guess we thought we would have some fun undoing each other? Winterysteppe (talk) 20:09, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The sandbox is meant to be for testing stuff that would be useful when writing articles (see Wikipedia:About the Sandbox), not for practising edit warring – don't get dragged into it!  —SMALLJIM  20:26, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Whlnterysteppe Adam9007 (talk) 21:48, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that. i checked his global contributions.... He did some stuff on other Wikis too. Winterysteppe (talk) 04:30, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CheckUser evidence has determined that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely to prevent abuse. Administrators: CheckUsers are privy to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy, and therefore must be consulted before this block can be removed. Administrators undoing checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser risk having their administrator rights removed by the Arbitration Committee (per this announcement).

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for sockpuppetry, including block evasion, performing "good hand, bad hand" edits (Whlnterysteppe, DesertGrass) and contributing to the same discussion with multiple accounts. (Winterysteppe, Outercrater) Mike V • Talk 20:36, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Mike V: Are you saying that Whlnterysteppe really is Winterysteppe? I thought he was an impostor? Adam9007 (talk) 21:07, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, they are  Confirmed accounts. Mike V • Talk 21:07, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Mike V: So User:Whlnterysteppe is not an impostor, but a real sockpuppet of the real user? What about User:Winterystepe and User:Wimterysteppe? I (obviously) know for a fact that User:Adam90007 is not me, and I highly doubt that User:Oshwash is the same person as Oshwah:. I'm just trying to get my head around who's real and who isn't, who's been impersonating who etc. I'm very interested to know who had impersonated me, as I'm sure you can imagine. Adam9007 (talk) 22:04, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And I know that User:Oshwash was definitely not me. Although it's too bad I didn't create it as a doppelgänger - I should have thought that it could have been used to impersonate me. No worries though; I've tightened my doppelgänger list up. That will hopefully make impersonating me harder to do :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:15, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What the heck? He fights vandalism like Cluebot NG! I have no clue what's going on. Peter Sam Fan 22:35, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

From a technical standpoint, only Whlnterysteppe is related to Winterysteppe. The other accounts are all confirmed to each other, but to a different individual. Mike V • Talk 22:41, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Mike V: Shall I delete the impostor notice, or start an MfD or something? Adam9007 (talk) 22:48, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Mike V:,@Peter SamFan:,@Oshwah:,@Adam9007:,Well, on the advice of Oshwah, I will appeal this. Winterysteppe (talk) 00:04, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Winterysteppe (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Here goes

I am appealing this check user block. Recently, everyone has seen a series of vandals targeting numerous people, most notably me. I had filed an SPI on the trolls, but was denied be cause those accounts were already blocked. I filed again with one goal: for the check user to hard block the IP address from editing again. Yes I socked with the account whinterysteppe. I created just that account to encourage a endorsed SPI. This time it worked, and backfired spectacularly. Amid hence my block.

Yes I screwed up. I messed up by socking. Thus, I have broken some of the solid rules that Wikipedia is built upon. For that, I deeply apologize for the crap that occurred. I am appealing the block because

• i will not create any other accounts to sock
• I will respect the rules and not deal with vandals anymore

Decline reason:

And then five minutes later you're doing it again. Nope. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 04:24, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

Winterysteppe (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

here let me give a reason. I had the Altnernate Frigid Soil intended to be on computers not secure. And the other ones intended to be a fresh start. I was hoping to lift a ban on one of them so i can have a fresh start on editing. I would deeply appreciated it one of the accounts could be unblocked so i can make a completely fresh start to edit Wikipedia. The others can stay blocked.

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=here let me give a reason. I had the Altnernate Frigid Soil intended to be on computers not secure. And the other ones intended to be a fresh start. I was hoping to lift a ban on one of them so i can have a fresh start on editing. I would deeply appreciated it one of the accounts could be unblocked so i can make a completely fresh start to edit Wikipedia. The others can stay blocked. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=here let me give a reason. I had the Altnernate Frigid Soil intended to be on computers not secure. And the other ones intended to be a fresh start. I was hoping to lift a ban on one of them so i can have a fresh start on editing. I would deeply appreciated it one of the accounts could be unblocked so i can make a completely fresh start to edit Wikipedia. The others can stay blocked. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=here let me give a reason. I had the Altnernate Frigid Soil intended to be on computers not secure. And the other ones intended to be a fresh start. I was hoping to lift a ban on one of them so i can have a fresh start on editing. I would deeply appreciated it one of the accounts could be unblocked so i can make a completely fresh start to edit Wikipedia. The others can stay blocked. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}