User talk:65.31.103.28

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=My ban from this website ended in January so I'm unsure what makes blocking administrator Ckatz (who is the same administrator who blocked me for a year) think he can come along and impose a ban or block based solely on the fact that I have been banned from this website before. The end of my previous ban was a long time ago and none of the countless edits I've made since then have been unconstructive so the admin is clearly abusing his admin tools. As for the comment above made by JamesBWatson (which I'm thinking Ckatz placed back on my userpage in an attempt to make me look bad when requesting an unblock); that had to do with this edit [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Curtis_Payne&diff=358398820&oldid=358398728] which he mistakenly took as vandalism because he's the type of user to go around wikipedia removing vandalism with rapid reversions, as shown here [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/JamesBWatson] . As you'll be able to note even from my userpage edit history [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:65.31.103.28&diff=358399224&oldid=358398829], I gave him a polite note on the issue before removing it as I felt it was a good faith editing mistake and that was the end of it. Anyways, I not only implore a fair-minded, non-biased admin to look through my numerous edits ''since my ban ended'' and see that they are nothing more than constructive, but to keep tabs on my dealings with this administrator and administrators alike who may use this logic to reblock me. Though investigation into my years of editing this website would be quite tedious, you will find that I've always been blocked for essentially the same reason; which is that I have been blocked in the past, and it sort of a never ending cycle. I would like to add that all those issues stemmed from an editing conflict with this same administrator (Ckatz) on the ''Judge Judy talkpage'' which was before he became an admin. Anyways, as the admin has now got wind that I'm editing the website, I also ask that someone keep tabs on similar unjust acts I may run into while trying to edit constructively so the issue doesn't continue to snowball. Thank you |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=My ban from this website ended in January so I'm unsure what makes blocking administrator Ckatz (who is the same administrator who blocked me for a year) think he can come along and impose a ban or block based solely on the fact that I have been banned from this website before. The end of my previous ban was a long time ago and none of the countless edits I've made since then have been unconstructive so the admin is clearly abusing his admin tools. As for the comment above made by JamesBWatson (which I'm thinking Ckatz placed back on my userpage in an attempt to make me look bad when requesting an unblock); that had to do with this edit [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Curtis_Payne&diff=358398820&oldid=358398728] which he mistakenly took as vandalism because he's the type of user to go around wikipedia removing vandalism with rapid reversions, as shown here [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/JamesBWatson] . As you'll be able to note even from my userpage edit history [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:65.31.103.28&diff=358399224&oldid=358398829], I gave him a polite note on the issue before removing it as I felt it was a good faith editing mistake and that was the end of it. Anyways, I not only implore a fair-minded, non-biased admin to look through my numerous edits ''since my ban ended'' and see that they are nothing more than constructive, but to keep tabs on my dealings with this administrator and administrators alike who may use this logic to reblock me. Though investigation into my years of editing this website would be quite tedious, you will find that I've always been blocked for essentially the same reason; which is that I have been blocked in the past, and it sort of a never ending cycle. I would like to add that all those issues stemmed from an editing conflict with this same administrator (Ckatz) on the ''Judge Judy talkpage'' which was before he became an admin. Anyways, as the admin has now got wind that I'm editing the website, I also ask that someone keep tabs on similar unjust acts I may run into while trying to edit constructively so the issue doesn't continue to snowball. Thank you |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=My ban from this website ended in January so I'm unsure what makes blocking administrator Ckatz (who is the same administrator who blocked me for a year) think he can come along and impose a ban or block based solely on the fact that I have been banned from this website before. The end of my previous ban was a long time ago and none of the countless edits I've made since then have been unconstructive so the admin is clearly abusing his admin tools. As for the comment above made by JamesBWatson (which I'm thinking Ckatz placed back on my userpage in an attempt to make me look bad when requesting an unblock); that had to do with this edit [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Curtis_Payne&diff=358398820&oldid=358398728] which he mistakenly took as vandalism because he's the type of user to go around wikipedia removing vandalism with rapid reversions, as shown here [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/JamesBWatson] . As you'll be able to note even from my userpage edit history [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:65.31.103.28&diff=358399224&oldid=358398829], I gave him a polite note on the issue before removing it as I felt it was a good faith editing mistake and that was the end of it. Anyways, I not only implore a fair-minded, non-biased admin to look through my numerous edits ''since my ban ended'' and see that they are nothing more than constructive, but to keep tabs on my dealings with this administrator and administrators alike who may use this logic to reblock me. Though investigation into my years of editing this website would be quite tedious, you will find that I've always been blocked for essentially the same reason; which is that I have been blocked in the past, and it sort of a never ending cycle. I would like to add that all those issues stemmed from an editing conflict with this same administrator (Ckatz) on the ''Judge Judy talkpage'' which was before he became an admin. Anyways, as the admin has now got wind that I'm editing the website, I also ask that someone keep tabs on similar unjust acts I may run into while trying to edit constructively so the issue doesn't continue to snowball. Thank you |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}