1956 in France, a priest is horribly murdered. An evil is spreading. Once again, Sister Irene comes face-to-face with Valak, the demon nun.1956 in France, a priest is horribly murdered. An evil is spreading. Once again, Sister Irene comes face-to-face with Valak, the demon nun.1956 in France, a priest is horribly murdered. An evil is spreading. Once again, Sister Irene comes face-to-face with Valak, the demon nun.
- Awards
- 1 win & 12 nominations
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaThe movie was filmed at an actual abandoned church in France.
- GoofsThe painting of the nun is the same Patrick Wilson painted in The Conjuring 2 (2016), which is set in1977, years after the events in this movie.
- Crazy creditsThere's a mid-credits scene.
- SoundtracksMoonlight Serenade
Music by Glenn Miller
Lyrics by Mitchell Parish
Performed by Mark 'Dr. SaxLove' Maxwell
Courtesy of Mark Maxwell Music
Featured review
So, I was actually quite looking forward to this one. I wasn't expecting much from the original since sequels, prequel's and spinoffs often times are not up to par with their predecessors. However, I was quite pleasantly surprised with the first Nun and still think that it is a wildly underrated horror. So, after viewing this one, I must say that I was pretty disappointed. It was not a bad film by any means, but it did not live up to the quality of the first one and really landed in a very mediocre place.
It had a quick start and didn't waste any time, throwing us into the action. Yet, even then, I stopped and thought "well, that could've been cooler ". This same sentiment persisted throughout the majority of the film. It gave us some fun and creepiness, but then proceeded to move at a snails pace for quite some time. It felt like we were about 45 minutes in until I got any semblance of a real story line or something particularly intriguing. It really felt like they were going through the motions, an outline for a horror movie. As if they were following a map with very similar chain of events as the original.
It is no secret that this franchise loves a jump scare. The first one was full of them, however, it was also balanced out by genuinely creepy and cool effects with a general effective spook factor. This one had a bit of that, but was mostly just riddled with cheap, unnecessary and superfluous jump scares. Even most of the kills, while still entertaining, were pretty basic. At the same time there were also some effective imagery especially in the third act, some gnarly effects, and some pretty awesome stunts that stuck out.
I think my biggest issue with this is that the first one felt very deliberate and purposeful in many ways. It felt planned out and detailed... whereas this one felt like it was thrown together with the very bare minimum they could get away with as far as storyline went. Again, not a bad film, but nowhere near the quality of the first one for me. Would recommend, but not vehemently.
(Also, what's up with all these fake reviews? Weird. Lol)
IG - howlingatthemoonreviews.
It had a quick start and didn't waste any time, throwing us into the action. Yet, even then, I stopped and thought "well, that could've been cooler ". This same sentiment persisted throughout the majority of the film. It gave us some fun and creepiness, but then proceeded to move at a snails pace for quite some time. It felt like we were about 45 minutes in until I got any semblance of a real story line or something particularly intriguing. It really felt like they were going through the motions, an outline for a horror movie. As if they were following a map with very similar chain of events as the original.
It is no secret that this franchise loves a jump scare. The first one was full of them, however, it was also balanced out by genuinely creepy and cool effects with a general effective spook factor. This one had a bit of that, but was mostly just riddled with cheap, unnecessary and superfluous jump scares. Even most of the kills, while still entertaining, were pretty basic. At the same time there were also some effective imagery especially in the third act, some gnarly effects, and some pretty awesome stunts that stuck out.
I think my biggest issue with this is that the first one felt very deliberate and purposeful in many ways. It felt planned out and detailed... whereas this one felt like it was thrown together with the very bare minimum they could get away with as far as storyline went. Again, not a bad film, but nowhere near the quality of the first one for me. Would recommend, but not vehemently.
(Also, what's up with all these fake reviews? Weird. Lol)
IG - howlingatthemoonreviews.
- Howling_at_the_Moon_Reviews
- Sep 7, 2023
- Permalink
- How long is The Nun II?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official sites
- Languages
- Also known as
- La Monja II
- Filming locations
- Couvent des Prêcheurs, Aix-en-Provence, Bouches-du-Rhône, France(boarding school interiors and cloister)
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Budget
- $38,000,000 (estimated)
- Gross US & Canada
- $86,267,073
- Opening weekend US & Canada
- $32,603,336
- Sep 10, 2023
- Gross worldwide
- $269,667,073
- Runtime1 hour 50 minutes
- Aspect ratio
- 2.39 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content