User talk:Moheen

I am busy in real life and might not respond swiftly to queries. For urgent oversight matters, please write to oversight-commons@lists.wikimedia.org. If you require the assistance of a bureaucrat, please leave a message at the bureaucrats' noticeboard. If you seek the help of an administrator, please leave a message at the administrators' noticeboard.

Archives 2013-14 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021-22 2023

Happy holidays! Merry christmas! Best wishes for 2024! -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:13, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

		* Happy Holidays! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 21:22, 22 December 2023 (UTC)   [reply]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

• File:Apache girl (8954418606).jpg

And also:

• File:Diana (8369163184).jpg

Yours sincerely, JopkeB (talk) 16:23, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! বাংলার প্রেমে উইকি লোগো.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:56, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wiki Loves Bangla banner.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support I can't read the Bengali letters but I think it's ok :) --Plozessor 17:10, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply] @Plozessor: Please see the English Title, both are the same in translation. :) Moheen 07:27, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chittagong Liberty School and College (124216).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 17:36, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mahamaya Irrigation Dam Regulator (east-west axis).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:50, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:08, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lee Kong Chian Natural History Museum (front, south exposure).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:33, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:23, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gandaran Buddha, NUS Museum.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 15:27, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:01, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anchor from the RMS Empress of Asia (front), National Museum of Singapore.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 15:27, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:23, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Arietites bucklandi, Lee Kong Chian Natural History Museum.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:33, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:22, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ning Yeung Wui Kuan Bell (front), National Museum of Singapore.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:57, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Amandelbloesem - s0176V1962 - Van Gogh Museum.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Amandelbloesem - s0176V1962 - Van Gogh Museum.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Inani Beach (135005).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:27, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Police turret bell, National Museum of Singapore.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 04:54, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:21, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Physeter macrocephalus skeletons (side view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• The scope must be Physeter macrocephalus skeleton Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:39, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• ----

Scope changed from Physeter macrocephalus skeletons, Lee Kong Chian Natural History Museum (side view) to Physeter macrocephalus skeletons (side view) ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 19:11, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Comment @Charlesjsharp:  Done. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 19:11, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Ok for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Thanks. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:42, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Korenveld met kraaien - s0149V1962 - Van Gogh Museum.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Korenveld met kraaien - s0149V1962 - Van Gogh Museum.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Vincent van Gogh - The yellow house ('The street').jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vincent van Gogh - The yellow house ('The street').jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Singapore Changi Airport Terminal 3 (113212).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 20:10, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plicofollis dussumieri, Inani Beach (131857).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 15:04, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Singapore Changi Airport Terminal 4 (165259).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 13:56, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taxidermied Saltwater crocodile (Crocodylus porosus), Lee Kong Chian Natural History Museum (102451).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:13, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BL 9.2-inch Mk IV & BL 8-inch Mk VII Guns, Fort Siloso (171135).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:37, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casemates, Fort Siloso Square (171549).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 17:37, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BL 9.2-inch Mk IV & BL 8-inch Mk VII Guns, Fort Siloso (171304).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:38, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taxidermied Saltwater crocodile (Crocodylus porosus), Lee Kong Chian Natural History Museum (102439).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:22, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marina Bay Sands (230913).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 17:46, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marina Bay, Singapore (233737).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 17:46, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-37 Pentz Street, Bo-Kaap (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nikride 14:58, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tamil Methodist Church, Singapore (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wale Street, Bo-Kaap (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:31, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:16, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Moheen, Project Korikath welcomes you to take part in Wiki Loves Earth Bangladesh 2024! Wiki Loves Earth (WLE) is an annual international photographic competition held throughout May and June. Project Korikath is the organizer of this year's Wiki Loves Earth in Bangladesh! You can visit the contest page for more details. You'll find the rules to take part in the contest there. You can also read this handbook for details about the campaign. Help us to showcase the breathtaking beauty of Bangladesh in Wikipedia and its sister projects. Let’s aim to bring Bangladesh to the top of the winner list among countries from all over the world this year! Cheers! Mrb Rafi (talk) On Behalf of Project Korikath

You're getting this message because you've participated similar Wikimedia photography contests in the past. If you'd prefer not to receive these updates from Project Korikath, you can unsubscribe by sending an email to korikath-ownerlists.wikimedia.org

Hi, I've noticed that you were the only user to vote in the File:(Venice) Fra'Mauro's World Map - Biblioteca Nazionale Marciana.jpg procedure for Valuable Image. Can you take a look at the discussion page? The image seems to be AI upscalated…Regards, Jtorquy (talk) 19:29, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It can be goes with a discussion in Most Valued Review. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 08:38, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Moheen, two files you deleted, this one and this one had derivatives created from them - shouldn't those derivatives be deleted too? -- DeFacto (talk). 14:31, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DeFacto  Done. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 15:59, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pajorita Matta, The Witch's Cradle (1943).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ rom��nă ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

hinnk (talk) 03:37, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What was going on with File:Conference Dashboard - ConventionExtension.png? This was a... screenshot of a MediaWiki extension. How could this possibly have been a copyright violation? JPxG (talk) 08:29, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was tagged by Encik Tekateki as possible copyvio because Images likely belonged to Cisco Webex.. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 15:49, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was a screenshot of a MediaWiki extension written during GSoC by an intern at the specific behest of the WMF, specifically https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Chughakshay16/ConventionExtension -- how could this possibly "belong to Cisco Webex"? JPxG (talk) 03:31, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cheragee Art Show 2 (01).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 08:26, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cheragee Art Show 2 (2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 17:23, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bangladesh National Museum northern side (01).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 04:11, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 14 October 2024, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2022 Picture of the Year contest.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:PHP Family is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified: How to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category [edit] English · español · français When you want to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category, best practice is to mark it with either: {{SD|C2}} ("unuseful empty category") if it would be OK to re-create it in the future, given that appropriate content becomes available {{SD|C1}} ("improperly named category") if it is an inappropriate category name that should not be reused (e.g. typos). "C1" and "C2" come from Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion. You could also use of the following: {{badname|current category name}} {{speedy|empty, misspelled category name}} The above templates (SD, speedy, Badname) expand to full speedy deletion requests. In particular, this is better practice than just blanking the category page. Blanked categories end up on Special:UncategorizedCategories, which is largely handled by non-admins who cannot delete the categories in question. Thank you. (This is a standardized talk page message) If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log. If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Prototyperspective (talk) 15:35, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.

Round 2 will end at 28 October 2024, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for delay in having this marked for translation. While preparing a page for translation, kindly make sure you do not issue "T-unit marker numbers" such as "<!--T:1-->". These are issued by the Extension, once a page is marked for translation by a TA. _Regards, Aafi ^(talk) 17:21, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, You deleted this page, but it seems the YT account is indeed the author. Yann (talk) 18:27, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]