Content deleted Content added
Line 347:
==Blocked 2==
Hello. You have been blocked from editing for 48 hours due to the labeling of a [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Transnistria&diff=prev&oldid=125313336 perfectly conventional edit] as "vandalism." You must cease immediately from adding discord to the already-poisonous atmosphere in that article, or subsequent blocks will become increasingly lengthy — even as, and irrespective of the fact, that the arbitration case remains ongoing. Thanks in advance. [[User:El C|El_C]] 04:22, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
::Hey you blocked me for no reason. Could you explain me why [[User:Dikarka]] removed/moved the paragraphs without seeking consensus first. The right way of discussion is in the first please to seek the approval by the majority of the
::I am not a vandal I am a victim. The only thing that i am guilty: is holding on to the agreement and restoring undisguised changes in such a controversial article as Transnistria. Please unblock me.
::And one more [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Transnistria&diff=125473845&oldid=125457737 just look here] after you blocked me [[User:Alaexis]] deleted valuable references and then inserted the fact tag. He just vandalized the article why don’t you block him? [[User:EvilAlex|EvilAlex]] 15:55, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
|