Content deleted Content added
EvilAlex (talk | contribs)
EvilAlex (talk | contribs)
Line 347:
==Blocked 2==
Hello. You have been blocked from editing for 48 hours due to the labeling of a [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Transnistria&diff=prev&oldid=125313336 perfectly conventional edit] as "vandalism." You must cease immediately from adding discord to the already-poisonous atmosphere in that article, or subsequent blocks will become increasingly lengthy — even as, and irrespective of the fact, that the arbitration case remains ongoing. Thanks in advance. [[User:El C|El_C]] 04:22, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
::Hey you blocked me for no reason. Could you explain me why [[User:Dikarka]] removed/moved the paragraphs without seeking consensus first. The right way of discussion is in the first please to seek the approval by the majority of the veteran users and only the do the controversial changes. Just think what will happen if everyone will be behaving in the same way as [[User:Dikarka]]. Transnistria is a highly controversial topic for many contributors. The data that [[User:Dikarka]] tried to removed have been previously agreed buy the majority of users (please see archive talk).
::I am not a vandal I am a victim. The only thing that i am guilty: is holding on to the agreement and restoring undisguised changes in such a controversial article as Transnistria. Please unblock me.
::And one more [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Transnistria&diff=125473845&oldid=125457737 just look here] after you blocked me [[User:Alaexis]] deleted valuable references and then inserted the fact tag. He just vandalized the article why don’t you block him? [[User:EvilAlex|EvilAlex]] 15:55, 24 April 2007 (UTC)