Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
m Reverted edits by 86.13.127.147 (talk) to last version by Atif.t2 |
||
Line 7:
| full name =
| citations = [2014] [http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2014/360.html EWCA Civ 360]
0 The liquidator argued this was all connected, and the $100,000 was Mr Gorecia’s reward for diverting Relfo’s funds for Varsani’s benefit. Therefore, Relfo Ltd retained a title in equity over the funds that Mr Varsani held, that Varsani was on notice of the facts at all times and so was a constructive trustee, and that even if tracing was not possible the payments were connected enough to base an unjust enrichment claim.▼
▲
==Judgment==
| |||