Talk:5th Cavalry Regiment

  Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.1cda.org/history-5cav.html and http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/agency/army/1-5cav-hist.htm. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:12, 30 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 5th Cavalry Regiment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100909001023/http://www.hood.army.mil/1stcavdiv/units/2BCT/1-5/Default.asp to http://www.hood.army.mil/1stcavdiv/units/2bct/1-5/Default.asp
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101123134250/http://www.hood.army.mil/1stcavdiv/units/1bct/2-5/Default.asp to http://www.hood.army.mil/1stcavdiv/units/1bct/2-5/Default.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:16, 19 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 5th Cavalry Regiment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110614034940/http://www.hood.army.mil/1stcavdiv/units/1bct/2-5/history.asp to http://www.hood.army.mil/1stcavdiv/units/1BCT/2-5/history.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:32, 5 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

The lead says the unit was activated in 1861 but the body and infobox indicate 1855 was the year. Stefen Tower_{s among the rest!} ^{Gab • Gruntwerk} 20:39, 25 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

The 5th Cavalry was the 2nd Cavalry prior to 1861. The US mounted service was all uniformly designated as "cavalry" at that time. Prior to that you had two regiments of dragoons, a regiment of mounted rifles, and two regiments of cavalry. Note the current 2nd Cavalry was originally the 2nd Dragoons and was renamed 2nd Cavalry in 1861. Intothatdarkness 01:14, 26 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

OK, but the current state of the article may confuse readers. How should this be resolved in the article for greater clarity? What should be changed to what for that purpose? Surely the lead should have 1855 mentioned if that's what the reader is going to see in the body and infobox. Stefen Tower_{s among the rest!} ^{Gab • Gruntwerk} 02:36, 26 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

In my opinion the lede should be changed to 1855. Possible language could be "1855 (as 2nd Cavalry)" or something similar. This takes into account the original unit designation. Intothatdarkness 12:02, 26 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the suggestion. I have decided to let editors more familiar with the subject tackle this. I don't think my editing would lead to a good enough result. Stefen Tower_{s among the rest!} ^{Gab • Gruntwerk} 07:58, 30 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

I went ahead and changed it. Intothatdarkness 14:11, 30 June 2024 (UTC)Reply