Talk:Naval Strike Missile

http://www.cisionwire.com/kongsberg-gruppen-asa/the-norwegian-government-has-decided-to-present-the-continued-development-of-kongsberg-s-jsm--joint-strike-missile--for-the-parliament107188

IMHO this is noteworthy one way or another after Parliament either accepts or rejects the contract. Hcobb (talk) 15:34, 12 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Naval Strike Missile. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120620192518/http://www.altair.com.pl/start-7226 to http://www.altair.com.pl/start-7226
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070222210823/http://www.kongsberg.com/eng/kda/news/default.asp?id=33279 to http://www.kongsberg.com/eng/kda/news/default.asp?id=33279
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100904081327/http://www.electronicstalk.com/news/gre/gre289.html to http://www.electronicstalk.com/news/gre/gre289.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100107213656/http://www.defpro.com/news/details/5241/ to http://www.defpro.com/news/details/5241/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:36, 14 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

What's the diameter of the NSM? OK weaponsystems.net states a diameter of 50 cm, ~20.4 inches. Look at the picture - it is NOT circular.- forward half probably is. That launch booster - I think it might be 20-21 inch diameter. Forward half to me looks like it is in the 12-16 inch diamter range (reminder- US SM missiles, VLA and Harpoon are 13.5 inch. Wfoj3 (talk) 11:49, 3 January 2024 (UTC).Reply

"(..) its width is 700 mm, expanding to 1.36 meters with wings deployed". Google is your friend. ^[1] Znuddel (talk) 16:46, 3 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Is Thor in the US making Naval Strike Missile?--联合果君 (talk) 18:06, 27 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thor? --Znuddel (talk) 19:52, 11 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

I expect he means Kongsberg Defence & Aerospace - in actuality there is probably a legally different company making these in the US, Since the US navy is using it, and US DoD generally only buys "Made In America" . Anybody know why? Any details to add. The US using - it has to have some significant greater capabilities compared to AGM-84 Harpoon. Wfoj3 (talk) 11:43, 3 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

The article says the F-35 can carry the NSM internally, but does that also apply to the F-35B or just the A and C variants? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.147.5.172 (talk) 09:40, 11 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Why are there 2 "Operator" sections? Someone should merge them — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:EE0:4F40:3DE0:E451:E657:8A97:84B9 (talk) 12:36, 22 March 2022 (UTC)Reply