Babysharkboss2

Hello, Babysharkboss2,

If you want to participate in AFD deletion discussion, please give arguments that demonstrate you have studied the article being discussed and carefully reviewed the sources supplied, in the article and in the discussion. Don't just offer an opinion, offer an argument to support your view that is grounded in Wikipedia policy and guidelines. I'm not trying to discourage your participation, I just want you to take it more seriously. AFDs are not for every editor as it requires knowledge and time to contribute productively to the discussion. I know you can do it, just do so thoughtfully. Thanks. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:51, 25 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for thanking me. It makes me feel good, and reminds me that someone appreciates my work. Wasabi-The-LoreMaster (talk) 21:05, 25 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi, just a quick note that pinging admins in situations like this is generally unnecessary; usually when dealing with situations like this, the less attention we give them, the better. Thanks, Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 15:42, 27 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

ok, sorry! Babysharkboss2!! ^{(Slap me with the fish. I dare you.)} 15:44, 27 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

I wouldn't be citing precedent to someone who's had 15 years more on this platform than you have, pal. Americanfreedom (talk) 16:46, 27 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Do not call others cockbreath. WP:NPA Babysharkboss2!! ^{(Slap me with the fish. I dare you.)} 17:10, 27 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

i will watch your page to see if u make mistake and I will slap you with the trout. 4.39.220.106 (talk) 18:59, 27 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

...ok...? what's the purpose of this message? Babysharkboss2!! ^{(Slap me with the fish. I dare you.)} 19:00, 27 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

because ur thing says slap you with the fish. so i will do it. 4.39.220.106 (talk) 19:03, 27 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Babysharkboss2,

Today you deleted fully sourced and cited historical material concerning a racial atrocity that took place in Erwin, Tennessee in 1918. This is the fourth time since 2011 that mention of the event has been deleted from the History section of the town's article, either completely or in part. Full citations have also been deleted, with spurious reasons such as calling a College website source a "private website."

You gave no reason for your deletion.

The matter of these repeated deletions has been broached on the articles Talk page. Please present your reason for wanting to eliminate the history there rather than act in a vigilante manner. I will be reinstating the deleted and sourced material tomorrow, and if you wish to discuss it further, please do so on the Erwin Talk page. Catherineyronwode (talk) 05:37, 29 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi, you have been deleting sections of content because of what you say are 'shit references'. These references only relate to specific artists who performed at this event. Unfortunately they are the best source we have and I would argue it's better to have context via Discogs and Facebook, for example, than nothing at all. If you really object to an artist reference please can you justify that and only remove that specific reference and not the entire section if agreed. Thanks

Becuase they are shit sources. per WP:RSPFACEBOOK and WP:DISCOGS we mustn't use them. Babysharkboss2!! ^{(Slap me with the fish. I dare you.)} 12:03, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

If you object to a reference please just remove that. There is no justification for deleting an entire section. You are just applying a general recommendation here, which I agree in many cases is acceptable. However, how I can have a 'non shit' reference to an artist who has no other online references, given that many of these are small local artists from almost 20 years ago? Folkingman (talk) 13:04, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have restored the 06 event. If you insist on removing the references please do it on an individual basis. Thanks Folkingman (talk) 13:06, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

lease do it on an individual basis. Please expand on that. Babysharkboss2!! ^{(Slap me with the fish. I dare you.)} 13:08, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Most of the references aren't even ABOUT the festival. We'd rather have: "Five Iron Frenzy plays [insert song here] and blows crowd away!" from CNN, then "Just went to the Five Iron Frenzy concert! [insert song] was crazy!" from some random dude on facebook. please read WP:RSP Babysharkboss2!! ^{(Slap me with the fish. I dare you.)} 13:07, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Of course they are about the festival - they are the artists that played! As I said these artists are not famous. They are NOT like Five Iron Frenzy - they do not have other online references. To clarify, if you still object strongly to a specific reference and you feel the article is improved by removing that valuable context, then you can delete that specific reference, but retain the artist name. Folkingman (talk) 13:36, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Then there would be no point. References are still needed. Please read WP:RSP. If they aren't notable, don't include them, or don't shove unreliable sources into the article to add false notability. Babysharkboss2!! ^{(Slap me with the fish. I dare you.)} 13:38, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Just because they are not famous doesn't mean that they are not notable in our community. This is a local community festival, not a major international event, and this is a document of it. All history is important. Please can you restore the section and delete those references you object to. Folkingman (talk) 13:42, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Its not a personal thing, its Wikipedia rules. Babysharkboss2!! ^{(Slap me with the fish. I dare you.)} 13:43, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

I've updated the section removing all the 'shit references' that I can detect. Those that remain are to genuine sites, so no Facebook, Discogs, Amazon etc. I'm just trying to document an event for prosperity, not get into a battle on Protocol. Folkingman (talk) 13:58, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

you literally included a facebook link Babysharkboss2!! ^{(Trout me, pull the trigger.)} 14:01, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Folkingman Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources is an article where it shows reliable and unreliable sources and the reason why. for example, Discogs is not reliable due to it being user generated! Babysharkboss2!! ^{(Slap me with the fish. I dare you.)} 13:40, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for not deleting this time and for removing the ones I missed. When I have time I will go back over preceding content and edit them out. Thanks for your help. Folkingman (talk) 14:04, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Resolved

Babysharkboss2!! ^{(Trout me, pull the trigger.)} 14:05, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I started a talk section on the Louis Fratino page. It includes the artist's historic inclusion in the 60th Venice Biennale. I've also added recent secondary source references from major publications on the artist. This includes The New York Times, Artforum, and The Financial Times. Can you help me out with next steps for removing the Notability flag? Would love to learn more about how one goes about doing this after adding reputable secondary source references as well major achievements in the "art world." Looking forward to learning more from you, thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peoplelikeyoulikeme (talk • contribs) 15:15, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your efforts to assist JLCSan. Unfortunately, the exchange that you're having with them right now is not getting them any closer to understanding our policies or what they have to do to get unblocked. They are probably not aware that they are not talking to an administrator. Posting on the talk pages of blocked users by non-admins is usually discouraged. ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 15:31, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Ok. Sorry. I was just trying to assist. I apologize. Babysharkboss2!! ^{(Trout me, pull the trigger.)} 15:34, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

No apology needed! ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 15:42, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Babysharkboss2: Hi, by undoing my edit to the above article, you have caused the article to be grammatically incorrect and also returned hyperbole/incorrect information to the plot summary. For instance, they say a character dies when absolutely no mention of death is made in the film - in fact, the character in question BLINKS while stunned/unconscious before being revived. She is not killed. Also, there are sentences that are run-ons/have far too many subjects, followed by pronouns and general group words. When you do that, someone who hasn't seen the film might be confused which subject the pronouns or group word refer to (for instance, "Gang" in a sentence that refers to both the paw patrol and Vance's group. Far better to just clarify by name which group it is). There are 2 or 3 unregistered IPs who keep putting back the grammatically poor sentences in question and also putting back the thing about a character dying, which is totally incorrect. One of these IPs already has warnings for bad edits to a previous article. I can only assume it's either sock-puppets or one person using multiple devices, I think, but their edits ARE INCORRECT. Therefore they should not be returned to the article. EEBuchanan (talk) 19:00, 4 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

I've requested protection for the page, but it seems like the vandals are now targeting the talk page, as well as Bahrain and Bahrain national football team. As an Indonesian myself, I'm really embarrassed by those hooligans. Sigh 🤦 — Preceding unsigned comment added by KIDE777 (talk • contribs) 19:14, 10 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Its ok. I'm out here fightin' in the war. The RFPP'll go through soon hopefully.

Why have you reverted my edit? I edited the caption to match the picture. The curly quotes are clearly visible. 195.187.108.130 (talk) 19:51, 10 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

I removed the reference to the magazine Semana, despite including references to history books and doctoral papers. There is no reason to reverse the article now. 194.38.172.194 (talk) 15:00, 15 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

You have been trouted for: Calling me a TPS Eiofweh (talk) 18:21, 15 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

{tpa} means I'M talk page stalking. I never said you were one. So, sour trout!

It's okay that you blanked the page, in fact I just thanked you for that, but the speedy deletion templates will more effectively do the same thing. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 18:22, 15 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Ahh, ok! Thanks, and sorry! Babysharkboss2!! ^{(Yes, this is indeed...a JoJo reference.)} 18:24, 15 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

An IP has opened an ANI post about you but they did not informed you. Here is the link: [1] VViking_TalkEdits 14:23, 16 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

What'd I do this time? Babysharkboss2!! ^{(I spread pro-Weezer propaganda)} 14:25, 16 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the alert, btw. Babysharkboss2!! ^{(I spread pro-Weezer propaganda)} 14:28, 16 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

My pleasure. Enjoy your day. --VViking_TalkEdits 14:30, 16 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

I just wanted to say I think you've been a little bitey there, you didn't need to do all caps "YOU" and bolden it, it was a bit harsh, I don't think they understand WP:GNG, but really it should've been properly explained. Just for future :) Zippybonzo | talk | contribs (they/them) 16:36, 21 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Ahh, my bad. I'm just on a short fuse today. Its just an interesting situation. I'll strike it. Babysharkboss2!! ^{(Fuel, Fire, Desire)} 16:37, 21 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Zippybonzo | talk | contribs (they/them) 16:51, 21 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Assalam o alaikum. Baby shark boss 2.

You have previously undone my edit in "list of scientists in medical Islamic world". In my edit, I removed the word "astrologers" from the page. Astrologers aren't scientist, they don't do anything scientific. That is why keeping the word in this page is wrong. If astrologers are not considered scientist, then how can we add there name in a page named "list of scientists"? Also, by writing that word in it, you are blaming the other scientists, who weren't astrologers, to be astrologers. I request you that please don't change my edit this time. Astrologers aren't scientists so they can't be added in the list of scientists. Also, you re-added the name of Abu Ma'shar al-Balkhi in the list even when he was prominently an astrologer while all others weren't. I hope you understand.

Also, sorry for bad English I am not Englishman. Hahoo1234 (talk) 08:07, 23 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

My preference is that they not be blanked as it adds more steps to reviewing. Thanks -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:25, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Oh, shit, my bad. Didn't know that. Sorry. Babysharkboss2!! ^{(Viva la Vendetta)} 17:27, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Babysharkboss2,

I'm not sure why but you blanked this orphaned talk page and then tagged it as a CSD G13 speedy deletion even though it wasn't a stale draft. First, please do not blank pages unless there is some objectionable content, like a copyright violation or a BLP violation. And, in those cases, when you tag the page with Twinkle, Twinkle will take care of that. Second, if you want to continue to patrol pages, please review WP:CSD and know the codes thoroughly. There was no way this orphaned talk page (CSD G8) could be mistaken for a stale draft article and since it was recently edited, even if you thought it was a draft page (that for some reason was on a Talk page), it could not be considered stale. Thank you for your contributions. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:26, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

can you please help in putting correct information in cow dung war top in indian village? Too many hindu people edit it to their Zezo39 (talk) 15:33, 30 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

?? Babysharkboss2!! ^(Hardwired!) 15:36, 30 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

The people are speceficlly including muslims in the wiki page instead of saying various local communities, including one religon and not naming other is discrimination Zezo39 (talk) 15:41, 30 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

is it though??? Babysharkboss2!! ^(Hardwired!) 15:42, 30 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

yes it is💀 i asked for it to be locked so that it edited by the public anymore, disceimination against religon will not be tolerated Zezo39 (talk) 15:55, 30 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Pidakala War. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. I urge - despite your beliefs - you leave the page alone for now. Administrators will revert it to the correct edition in due course. You'd be wasting your time by continuously fighting the other users. Synorem (talk) 16:04, 30 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, fair. I'll back off. I apologize. Babysharkboss2!! ^(Hardwired!) 16:11, 30 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Again, could you please elaborate on what exactly you think is unsourced here? The template clearly leads to the official page of the BVMI and states that the single "Master of Puppets" was certified gold. Pretty straightforward. Lk95 (talk) 16:45, 31 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Had dodgey internet, just checked it. Sorry. You can revert if you want, or i'll self-reverse. Sorry. Babysharkboss2!! ^(Hardwired!) 16:47, 31 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Talk:Republican Party efforts to disrupt the 2024 United States presidential election#Removal of baseless in allegations of non citizens voting I believe you accidentally reverted my message I reverted you cause I believe it was a mistake as i was using the talk page as intended •Cyberwolf•talk? 15:40, 6 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

I actually came to this talk page to reach out about that that revert. There was not a legitimate reason to remove the comment on the talk page @Babysharkboss2, please do not do so in the future unless it's clearly intentionally disruptive or vandalism. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:44, 6 November 2024 (UTC)Reply