Commontater

Joined 1 May 2007

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Timtrent (talk | contribs) at 12:30, 6 September 2024 (Notification: Your Articles for Creation submission has been accepted (AFCH)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Samuel of Escaleta moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to Samuel of Escaleta. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hitro talk 06:34, 13 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you @HitroMilanese. I've added several more sources to the article which I hope show notability. I submitted the draft article about Samuel of Escaleta, but it was immediately rejected by @Shadow311 for not being written in the formal tone of an encyclopedia and not having a neutral point of view. I thought that the fact that the bulk of the article is from an entry in The Jewish Encyclopedia seems to show both notability and neutrality (and encyclopediability). Samuel of Escaleta is mentioned by name many times in Minchat Kenaot, which is a record of one of the biggest theological disputes in the 13th-century Jewish world.
Can you please advise on whether you think the article is salvageable. If not, I'll delete it, because I can't find any more sources. Commontater (talk) 16:06, 13 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Its salvageable, just it was not written neutrally. I suggest just removing Non-neutral parts or rephrasing it to be in a neutral way. Shadow311 (talk) 16:10, 13 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
I went through the article of Draft:Samuel Sulami making it more encyclopedic and adding a lot more information and context than was in the original Jewish Encyclopedia article. I also changed the name of the article to reflect the more common usage. I have resubmitted it. I hope you will now be able to approve it @Shadow311. Thank you Commontater (talk) 09:06, 14 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Samuel of Escaleta (May 13)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Shadow311 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Shadow311 (talk) 15:54, 13 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Commontater! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Shadow311 (talk) 15:54, 13 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Augustin Bader

edit

Hi, Commontater, and thanks for creating the article on Augustin Bader. In the article's revision history, I noticed that your Edit Summary with the first edit did not comply with license requirements for the original source. No worries; we're all new at this at one time. So here's the page that will explain things and provide instructions: Help:Translation. Basically, the Edit Summary should have been: Content in this edit is translated from the existing German Wikipedia article at [[:de:Augustin Bader]]; see its history for attribution. I think it would be okay to add it now (without adding any content) versus not adding it at all. If you have any questions, etc., just ping me, OR, stop by the talkpage for the WikProject which supports translations from other language Wikipedias into EN-WP here: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Intertranswiki. Very glad to have you around; keep it up and happy editing! Rosiestep (talk) 17:12, 15 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you. I was not aware of those license requirements. Are they the same for translations from all Wikipedia languages? I will add the attribution now. (Though I also added new content to the page, it is not entirely a direct translation). Thanks Commontater (talk) 17:15, 15 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hi, and yes, same for all translations from some language Wikipedia into EN-WP, e.g., I noticed the same issue with your transltaion on the article, Ḥiyya bar Ami. Note, it's best to do the translation edits and the adding of new content edits as separate edits, and include appropriate/clarifying Edit Summaries with each edit. --Rosiestep (talk) 17:21, 15 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
P.S. For transparency, I'm a New Page Patroller (WP:NPP), which is how I noticed these 2 articles. --Rosiestep (talk) 17:22, 15 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
I have translated several Hebrew articles using the Wikipedia translation tool. I guess I assumed it would automatically add whatever tags needed editing. I wrote in my edit summaries "translated from the Hebrew article" but without the entire code you provided. I will know going forward. Thank you. I appreciate it. Commontater (talk) 17:27, 15 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hi again. If you have a moment, could you comment at the conversation happening here: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Intertranswiki#Edit Summary when using the Wikipedia translation tool? We're all trying to learn so your feedback would be helpful. Thank you, and thanks again for what you do around here. --Rosiestep (talk) 11:52, 16 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Samuel Sulami has been accepted

edit
 
Samuel Sulami, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 12:30, 6 September 2024 (UTC)Reply