Marco Guzman, Jr

Hello, Marco Guzman, Jr, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some tips to get you started:

• Edit a page by clicking 'Edit this page' or 'Edit' on the top of the page.
• Use the Wikipedia sandbox or create your own personal sandbox to experiment.
• Sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username and the date.
• Be civil, practice Wikipedia etiquette, and do not vandalize.
• Cite your sources using <ref></ref> tags. For example, type <ref>Example reference. http://www.example.com. Accessed January 1, 1900.</ref> to produce this tag:^[1]

• To create an article, use the article wizard.
• Consider joining a WikiProject, such as the Biography WikiProject.
• Use two apostrophes for italic text (''italic text''), three apostrophes for bold text ('''bold text'''), five apostrophes for bold and italic text ('''''Bold and italic text'''''), two brackets for an internal link ([[page name]]), two brackets and a pipe (|) for an internal link with different text to be displayed ([[page name|text to be displayed]]), the link, including the http:// prefix, for external links (http://www.example.com), one bracket and a space for an external link with different text to be displayed ([http://www.example.com Text to be displayed]), and two curly brackets for {{templates}}. See this page for more formatting marks.

Also take a look at some of these pages:

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click the button below. Happy editing!

Again, welcome! Samwb123^{Please read} 21:59, 31 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Glad to see that your back! House1090 (talk) 23:18, 31 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thank you House! It's good to be back. How are those Inland Empire-related articles coming along? You've done an amazing job with them. If you ever need help let me know. I'll have you on my watch list and hope working with you in future projects.-- Marco Guzman, Jr  Chat  00:53, 1 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, I'll keep you posted if we need any help with IE related articles and what not. And if I can be of any help let me know. House1090 (talk) 01:25, 1 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Damn! I'd revert you just for trolling, but you went and referenced it. (My mother used to say, "You can catch more flies with honey than with vinegar." Notwithstanding that vinegar catches Drosophila, you might back down a bit so that you don't seem as stubborn and opinionated as 71.202.205.242.)--Curtis Clark (talk) 02:43, 9 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Marco, your recent edit to Cal Poly just evidences the fact that you are a racist. You criticize a campus because of the races of its student body? Wow. As I'm sure you're not aware, Prop 209 removed affirmative action in California public university admissions. Thus, everyone who's at Cal Poly earned their way in. Whatever their race happens to be, well, that's who earned it. But hey, if you want to live in a world that sees people as merely colors or races, you go right ahead. I'll leave your edit up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.202.205.242 (talk) 03:37, 9 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

You now what I'm taking Dr. Clarks advice. I'm taking a break for this. I'll just edit engineering-related articles from now on.-- Marco Guzman, Jr  Chat  04:11, 9 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Your attempted move of Royal Navy has been reverted. Please read WP:COMMONNAME, and also WP:MOVE. David Biddulph (talk) 07:08, 6 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

I second that. I do sympathise with your reasonings, and I even have fought other editors to keep "British Royal Navy" in some articles as clarification. Howver, you must gain a consensus through the move process first on this article's name, which has been debated many times in the past, without success in renaming it. - BilCat (talk) 07:11, 6 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

I like your suggestion to use the full name for the Cal Poly engineering articles (i.e. "California State Polytechnic University, Pomona College of Engineering"). I think it would basically end the debate, and make the articles more stable. If that's what we do, I won't edit the names further. Let me know.

Pedantically, there should be a comma after Pomona: "California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, College of Engineering"; since the initial comma is intended to set "Pomona" out of the flow of the sentence, a trailing comma is needed if the sentence continues. Only pedants like me will notice, but, taken to an extreme, one can end up with "California State University, Sacramento's library", which to the uninitiated can suggest that Sacramento only has one library, named "California State University".--Curtis Clark (talk) 13:35, 13 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi Dr. Clark. You're right about the comma. My mistake. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.202.205.242 (talk) 09:03, 14 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

You know, I think we've gone a bit too far with eachother on here. I was literally sitting here a few minutes ago thinking about the most insulting thing I could write, and just kind of realized how absurd that is. For what it's worth, I apologize for my comments to you. Let's try to find some middle ground on the elided naming: maybe an officially/commonly known as section, a history section, or whatever. (I accidentally posted this first on your user page instead of your talk page--sorry about that). 71.202.205.242 (talk) 10:17, 2 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

And I got your message on the Cal Poly "talk" page, and agree that we'll chill out for a bit on the matter :-). 71.202.205.242 (talk) 10:18, 2 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks a lot! It smells great :)!

-- Marco Guzman, Jr  Chat  (talk) 19:58, 2 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

𝔚𝔥𝔦𝔠𝔥 𝔣𝔬𝔫𝔱 𝔡𝔬 𝔶𝔬𝔲 𝔲𝔰𝔢 𝔣𝔬𝔯 𝔱𝔥𝔢 𝔪𝔞𝔱𝔥𝔢𝔪𝔞𝔱𝔦𝔠𝔞𝔩 𝔰𝔶𝔪𝔟𝔬𝔩𝔰 (ℑ 𝔲𝔰𝔢 ℭ𝔬𝔡𝔢2001). 𝔚𝔢𝔯𝔢 𝔶𝔬𝔲 𝔞𝔴𝔞𝔯𝔢 𝔬𝔣 𝔱𝔥𝔦𝔰:http://www.ewellic.org/mathtext.html --Curtis Clark (talk) 14:58, 7 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

𝕀 𝕨𝕒𝕤 𝕟𝕠𝕥 𝕒𝕨𝕒𝕣𝕖 𝕠𝕗 𝕚𝕥𝕤 𝕖𝕩𝕚𝕤𝕥𝕒𝕟𝕔𝕖, 𝕓𝕦𝕥 𝕀'𝕞 𝕝𝕠𝕧𝕚𝕟𝕘 𝕚𝕥 𝕒𝕝𝕣𝕖𝕒𝕕𝕪! 𝕀𝕥'𝕤 𝕒 𝕝𝕠𝕥 𝕗𝕒𝕤𝕥𝕖𝕣 𝕥𝕙𝕒𝕟 𝕖𝕟𝕥𝕖𝕣𝕚𝕟𝕘 𝕥𝕙𝕖 𝕦𝕟𝕚𝕔𝕠𝕕𝕖 𝕝𝕖𝕥𝕥𝕖𝕣 𝕓𝕪 𝕝𝕖𝕥𝕥𝕖𝕣. 𝕀'𝕞 𝕦𝕤𝕚𝕟𝕘 ℂ𝕠𝕕𝕖𝟚𝟘𝟘𝟚 𝕒𝕟𝕕 𝕛𝕦𝕤𝕥 𝕕𝕠𝕚𝕟𝕘 𝕚𝕥 𝕗𝕠𝕣 𝕗𝕦𝕟! 𝕀'𝕞 𝕥𝕣𝕪𝕚𝕟𝕘 𝕥𝕠 𝕘𝕖𝕥 𝕞𝕠𝕣𝕖 𝕗𝕒𝕞𝕚𝕝𝕚𝕒𝕣 𝕨𝕚𝕥𝕙 𝕥𝕙𝕖 𝕞𝕒𝕣𝕜𝕦𝕡 𝕝𝕒𝕟𝕘𝕦𝕒𝕘𝕖 𝕃𝕒𝕋𝕖𝕏. 𝕋𝕙𝕒𝕟𝕜'𝕤 𝕗𝕠𝕣 𝕥𝕙𝕖 𝕙𝕖𝕝𝕡, 𝕔𝕙𝕖𝕖𝕣𝕤!-- Marco Guzman, Jr  Chat  04:44, 8 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Some other useful Unicode tools: http://www.unipad.org/main/, http://www.babelstone.co.uk/Software/BabelPad.html. The Cal Poly Pomona PDF phone book has a LaTeX step: A database query is used to create an XML file, which is converted using XSLT to LaTex. That file is then converted to PDF. The underlying database and applications have full Unicode support, but the font used in the PDF only covers Latin 1.--Curtis Clark (talk) 15:51, 8 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

The article BroncoFusion has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

one-day local student event - not notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD (talk) 12:59, 23 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, I agree it should be deleted. Any article that primarily consists of the schedule of the upcoming event is automatically suspect as non-encyclopedic; what would the article look like ten years from now? I think a comparison to the ASI article is apt: ASI has a budget larger than a lot of companies in Wikipedia, it has existed for decades, and will likely exist as long as CPP. It owns buildings. BroncoFusion, in comparison, is fluff. In any given year it is important to the students who attend, and there will alsways be some sort of "welcome to campus" event, but there's no insurance that next year it won't be re-conceptualized and renamed.--Curtis Clark (talk) 13:22, 23 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Done I have requested speedy deletion per CSD-G7. I still hope one day becomes the next Woodstock.-- Marco Guzman, Jr  Chat  15:15, 23 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

We just gotta get bigger bands!--Curtis Clark (talk) 19:06, 23 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on File:Cal Poly logo.svg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free image with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the image can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{non-free fair use in|article name that the image is used in}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the image. If the image has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

Since the image already exists in a low-resolution raster format, making a derivative work in vector format is unnecessary, thus not fair use. —Curtis Clark (talk) 03:08, 15 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Wouldn't a vector image be of better use in this case though? I'm not very fond of vector images thus far since I still find their usage cumbersome to a certain degree; however, I've notice most raster logos on Wikipedia being replaced by their vector counterparts. I think their resizing is easily achieved with no loss of quality. On a second thought I just noticed that at 2000px the letters come out weird. Meh, never mind. I still wonder if this image could be replaced by a vector one in the future though? As in, what if the raster image was nominated for deletion and the vector image became the only fair-use image pertaining the university's seal?-- Marco Guzman, Jr  Chat  03:37, 15 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

So you're saying that a derivative image that does not accurately represent the seal is more fair-use than a raster image obtained from a CPP graphics site and uncontested by the university? We'll have to see how that works out.--Curtis Clark (talk) 13:08, 15 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your support on the 2010 FIFA World Cup talk page. Please continue to assist in building the consensus, supported by STRONG precedent. Remember to keep civil and refrain from personal attacks. An edit war report has been filed against Walter Görlitz for administrative review here. Metallurgist (talk) 17:23, 26 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

You don't understand the issues. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:25, 26 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Who doesn't understand the issues?-- Marco Guzman, Jr  Chat  17:26, 26 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Apparently he is utilizing WP:Görlitz and not any other established rules.--Metallurgist (talk) 19:29, 26 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hello Marco. Regarding this edit where you restored a notice I left which the editor removed. He has the right to remove notices like that, so you probably shouldn't restore it again. See WP:BLANKING. EdJohnston (talk) 19:04, 27 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

I didn't know. Thank you for letting me know! -- Marco Guzman, Jr  Chat  04:12, 8 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Please note the name of the field to which you have added stars is "name". I know of no country called *France, or *****Brazil. Please discuss before you innovate with the content of long established infoboxes. Kevin McE (talk) 23:51, 27 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

You are right. Cheers! -- Marco Guzman, Jr  Chat  04:09, 8 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

I see that you've added a star to the logo of the Spanish national team at File:Escudo_Badge_España_Spain.png, which as we all know is traditionally added by a team each time that they win the World Cup. Although I think it's great that Spain won, and I look forward to seeing the new logo with a star in it, I have to ask: is this what the actual team's logo will officially look like? That size star, that color, that position? Have they already officially adopted this change, or is this just your guess as to what the new logo might look like? Do you have a source? Sorry to be a wet blanket, but WP can't officially change the logo until the team does. Bry9000 (talk) 01:12, 12 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

I used this image as the base model. The golden star will be the same color as the trims on the crest's outline per Royal Spanish Football Federation guidelines. I was actually rooting for the Netherlands! Cheers. -- Marco Guzman, Jr  Chat  01:32, 12 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Aha, I see. It's hard to tell whether that image is a valid source, but I'll leave it alone. Thanks. Bry9000 (talk) 01:54, 12 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

I'm actually working on a SVG image and someone had uploaded this other one. So, I decided that it would appease some of the new editors until the hype dies down in the first couple of days. I don't like the source more than you do and I hope to get the official aspect ratio of the star once the guidelines stipulate so. -- Marco Guzman, Jr  Chat  01:59, 12 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. —DoRD (talk) 12:21, 18 July 2010 (UTC) Reply

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Template:Infobox Cal Poly College, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. "Revert test"? I don't think this is a very good idea. EW_ikist^Talk 23:17, 23 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

I saw your interest on another talk page to try using WP:Huggle. Since the program requires the WP:Rollback flag to be enabled on your account, I have set this flag for you, as you appear to me to have a good grasp of what is and what is not vandalism. Please read both links carefully, though, as it is possible without much error to make a mess when using Huggle, and note that rollback is to be used for blatant vandalism only, nothing else (i.e. non-constructive, but good-faith edits.). Happy editing. Courcelles (talk) 12:01, 27 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your help. I am still new to the whole editing thing, but I'm still aware about what's OK to publish. I keep my eyes out for vandalism and spam, I'm just not completely up to speed on the Code and site aspect of it it.

Thanks again, Ray Singleton Rosing95 (talk) 00:48, 30 July 2010 (UTC)Rosing95Reply

Hi I'm looking to get in touch with you about MA, is there anyway we can chat?

3dtech (talk) 03:14, 4 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I noticed how quick you revert edits and leave warnings on talk pages, I can't keep up with you. How are you doing it so fast? Are you using a tool or something? Mr.Kennedy1 ^talk 00:24, 24 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cal Poly Pomona seal.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Curtis Clark (talk) 03:03, 26 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

The article UC Pomona has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 15:24, 21 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

So does Cal poly have staff that edit wikipedia to improve its image? Is this part of your job description?173.18.181.62 (talk) 21:34, 13 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

I believe the latest admit rate update is for freshmen and transfer students combined and not first time freshmen as stated. --Seaprt (talk) 04:58, 21 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Could you please add your source for The Collins College Admissions statistics? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lcmcpheron (talk • contribs) 17:26, 13 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi Marco! This is sawagner. Just noticed you back on here and thought I would say hello. How's school going these days? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.173.171.94 (talk) 08:32, 26 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for nominating the article. It will require a bit of work to bring this up to the GA criteria, but I have left you detailed notes and am looking forward to working with you. Thanks, Racepacket (talk) 04:47, 5 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hey Marco. I know that this has been beaten to death over the years, but I undid some of the changes to the "Name" section in the California Polytechnic State University article. I made it simply a brief section indicating the names. I made sure that Cal Poly Pomona was not referred to as a former "extension" campus, but as a former satellite campus. We can do the same to Pomona's article if you like to. I think if we make these things brief, we can avoid conlfict. What do you think? Sawagner (talk) 21:25, 8 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Although I checked the links at the start of my review a month ago, someone has check it after I passed the article and noticed two [citation needed] tags and two dead links marked with {{dead link}}. I hate to impose, but I'm a bit embarrassed by this. Could you help me out by quickly fixing these problems? Many thanks and thanks for the silver medal! Racepacket (talk) 03:53, 9 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

I believe we addressed the problem. I added the last footnote. Thank you again. On a separate subject, a forum has opened to give feedback on my GA reviews. If you have a few minutes, and you are interested, you can go to: Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Racepacket 2 and either endorse one of the views already expressed, or start your own section at the bottom called ==Outside view of Marco Guzman, Jr.== Thanks! Racepacket (talk) 06:16, 9 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Excuse me Mr Marco Guzman this is a commentary for you and your articles. Colonia Del Valle is not a neighborhood in Mexico is called "Colonias" perhaps elsewhere in the world like Califoria are called neighborhoods but in Mexico and not , of whatever opinion article should know the place of this talk, the person who wrote all this information that was erased is a person who knows of where speech and therefore can state that the information may not be in extrernas publications, but the inhabitants that has recurred en they can confirmed in her and iclusive of the country and the foreigner recidents of such europeans and Asian and others . 04/08/2011 Thank you and please take the advice.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Joseprzprz86 (talk • contribs) 19:45, 4 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

And again you, is the last time that I tell you what you are putting against the government, because even the new mayor Miguel Angel Mancera to all accredited national newspapers that he lives in the district and he accepts who exist some insecurity problems like all te some districts and neightborhoods of the city in all areas of all types of socioeconomic classes because of the situation of the country, can not be considerate of the ever proclaim as a high risk area an less like Tepito or Doctores you don't know what are you talking about, all the contrary is one of the areas where it is most invest in safety and all types of services offered in the area for the last time so do not edit and put nonsense that not even know what you mean. Thank You--Joseprzprz86 (talk) 18:30, 6 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hello Mr. Guzman Jr. well the reason of this talk with you is ask you, why are you erasing all the new articles that we are trying to put in the article, well your see, that article that you put to reference was three years a go and that news paper don't have any good reputation in the country and less in the city even, isn't a print news paper is only a digital doubtful reputation and if you try to read the new article that we are put in the security section you see that this article is from this year and was, in a interview with the mayor of the city. Thank you for put attention in my ask to you. --Latour86 (talk) 04:50, 5 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

This is for your excellent catch of my error at University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign. I felt (correctly, as it turns out) that that anon editor was mistaken in thinking that the previous U of I budget was massively exaggerated, but in my haste to demonstrate this, I clearly failed to read carefully what I had found. I'm glad that you did read it carefully. HuskyHuskie (talk) 02:50, 25 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on File:Tigres de Quintana Roo new logo.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Marco Guzman, Jr  Chat  08:36, 31 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Marco, give me a call - Franklin Ramos

The article Cal Poly Pomona Alumni Association has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TM 18:28, 4 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

The article Cal Poly Pomona Alumni Association has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TM 13:43, 5 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cal Poly Pomona Alumni Association is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cal Poly Pomona Alumni Association until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. TM 13:44, 5 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi Marco, I am a Wikipedian and researcher from Carnegie Mellon University, working with Professors Robert E. Kraut and Aniket Kittur. We’ve published many scholarly papers on Wikipedia and are partnering with the Wikimedia Foundation on several new projects.

I have been analyzing collaboration in Wikipedia, especially Collaborations of the Week/Month. My analysis of seven years of archival Wikipedia data shows that Collaborations of the Week/Month substantially increase the amount and nature of project members’ contributions, with long lasting effects. We would like to talk to Wikipedians to better understand the processes that that produce this behavior change.

We’ve identified you as a particularly good candidate to speak with because of your involvement with the WikiProject Universities' Collaborations, which is one of those we’ve been investigating. It would really help us if you would be willing to have a short talk with us, less than 30 minutes of your time. We can talk via skype or instant messenger or other means if you’d prefer. Do you have time at any point during this week to chat? If so, please send an email to haiyiz@cs.cmu.edu or drop a line on my talk page.

Thanks!

(This my personal website) Haiyizhu (talk) 23:07, 20 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Tiderolls 02:12, 24 May 2012 (UTC) Reply

Hi there, my name's Peter Coombe and I'm a Wikimedia Community Fellow working on a project to improve Wikipedia's help system. At the moment I'm trying to learn more about how people use and find the current help pages. If you could help by filling out this brief survey about your experiences, I'd be very grateful. It should take less than 10 minutes, and your responses will not be tied to your username in any way.

Thank you for your time,
the wub (talk) 18:15, 14 June 2012 (UTC) (Delivered using Global message delivery)Reply

Hi Marco: Just wanted to let you know that I mentioned your name at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mangoeater1000. I reopened the case because of a new sockpuppet. Thanks, 72Dino (talk) 23:21, 18 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hey Marco, where have you been? Your phone is not available. I've called, left voice mail, texted, and e-mailed you but have not heard back. Give me a call bruutherr! --Ramos1990 (talk) 02:53, 21 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi Marco, I really appreciate the barnstar. That's very kind of you. Best, 72Dino (talk) 19:57, 9 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Marco Guzman, Jr for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page.--Calpolylolli (talk) 19:37, 23 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

I've declined your speedy. It could be a useful split--there are enough people to justify it according to our usual way of handling university articles, and it might be much easier to watch. See my comment at the talk p. for the main university article; I'd like your opinion. At this point, there's some content that would need merging in any case. And also there is a good deal of content that would need rewriting from either version. Before I start such an extensive job, I'd like to decide which way to go. DGG ( talk ) 21:10, 24 November 2012 (UTC)Reply