Operator norm

Given two normed vector spaces ${\displaystyle V}$  and ${\displaystyle W}$  (over the same base field, either the real numbers ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} }$  or the complex numbers ${\displaystyle \mathbb {C} }$ ), a linear map ${\displaystyle A:V\to W}$  is continuous if and only if there exists a real number ${\displaystyle c}$  such that^[1] $${\displaystyle \|Av\|\leq c\|v\|\quad {\text{ for all }}v\in V.}$$ 

The norm on the left is the one in ${\displaystyle W}$  and the norm on the right is the one in ${\displaystyle V}$ . Intuitively, the continuous operator ${\displaystyle A}$  never increases the length of any vector by more than a factor of ${\displaystyle c.}$  Thus the image of a bounded set under a continuous operator is also bounded. Because of this property, the continuous linear operators are also known as bounded operators. In order to "measure the size" of ${\displaystyle A,}$  one can take the infimum of the numbers ${\displaystyle c}$  such that the above inequality holds for all ${\displaystyle v\in V.}$  This number represents the maximum scalar factor by which ${\displaystyle A}$  "lengthens" vectors. In other words, the "size" of ${\displaystyle A}$  is measured by how much it "lengthens" vectors in the "biggest" case. So we define the operator norm of ${\displaystyle A}$  as $${\displaystyle \|A\|_{\text{op}}=\inf\{c\geq 0:\|Av\|\leq c\|v\|{\text{ for all }}v\in V\}.}$$ 

The infimum is attained as the set of all such ${\displaystyle c}$  is closed, nonempty, and bounded from below.^[2]

It is important to bear in mind that this operator norm depends on the choice of norms for the normed vector spaces ${\displaystyle V}$  and ${\displaystyle W}$ .

Every real ${\displaystyle m}$ -by-${\displaystyle n}$  matrix corresponds to a linear map from ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{n}}$  to ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{m}.}$  Each pair of the plethora of (vector) norms applicable to real vector spaces induces an operator norm for all ${\displaystyle m}$ -by-${\displaystyle n}$  matrices of real numbers; these induced norms form a subset of matrix norms.

If we specifically choose the Euclidean norm on both ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{n}}$  and ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{m},}$  then the matrix norm given to a matrix ${\displaystyle A}$  is the square root of the largest eigenvalue of the matrix ${\displaystyle A^{*}A}$  (where ${\displaystyle A^{*}}$  denotes the conjugate transpose of ${\displaystyle A}$ ).^[3] This is equivalent to assigning the largest singular value of ${\displaystyle A.}$ 

Passing to a typical infinite-dimensional example, consider the sequence space ${\displaystyle \ell ^{2},}$  which is an L^p space, defined by $${\displaystyle \ell ^{2}=\left\{(a_{n})_{n\geq 1}:\;a_{n}\in \mathbb {C} ,\;\sum _{n}|a_{n}|^{2}<\infty \right\}.}$$ 

This can be viewed as an infinite-dimensional analogue of the Euclidean space ${\displaystyle \mathbb {C} ^{n}.}$  Now consider a bounded sequence ${\displaystyle s_{\bullet }=\left(s_{n}\right)_{n=1}^{\infty }.}$  The sequence ${\displaystyle s_{\bullet }}$  is an element of the space ${\displaystyle \ell ^{\infty },}$  with a norm given by $${\displaystyle \left\|s_{\bullet }\right\|_{\infty }=\sup _{n}\left|s_{n}\right|.}$$ 

Define an operator ${\displaystyle T_{s}}$  by pointwise multiplication: $${\displaystyle \left(a_{n}\right)_{n=1}^{\infty }\;{\stackrel {T_{s}}{\mapsto }}\;\ \left(s_{n}\cdot a_{n}\right)_{n=1}^{\infty }.}$$ 

The operator ${\displaystyle T_{s}}$  is bounded with operator norm $${\displaystyle \left\|T_{s}\right\|_{\text{op}}=\left\|s_{\bullet }\right\|_{\infty }.}$$ 

This discussion extends directly to the case where ${\displaystyle \ell ^{2}}$  is replaced by a general ${\displaystyle L^{p}}$  space with ${\displaystyle p>1}$  and ${\displaystyle \ell ^{\infty }}$  replaced by ${\displaystyle L^{\infty }.}$ 

Let ${\displaystyle A:V\to W}$  be a linear operator between normed spaces. The first four definitions are always equivalent, and if in addition ${\displaystyle V\neq \{0\}}$  then they are all equivalent:

${\displaystyle {\begin{alignedat}{4}\|A\|_{\text{op}}&=\inf &&\{c\geq 0~&&:~\|Av\|\leq c\|v\|~&&~{\text{ for all }}~&&v\in V\}\\&=\sup &&\{\|Av\|~&&:~\|v\|\leq 1~&&~{\mbox{ and }}~&&v\in V\}\\&=\sup &&\{\|Av\|~&&:~\|v\|<1~&&~{\mbox{ and }}~&&v\in V\}\\&=\sup &&\{\|Av\|~&&:~\|v\|\in \{0,1\}~&&~{\mbox{ and }}~&&v\in V\}\\&=\sup &&\{\|Av\|~&&:~\|v\|=1~&&~{\mbox{ and }}~&&v\in V\}\;\;\;{\text{ this equality holds if and only if }}V\neq \{0\}\\&=\sup &&{\bigg \{}{\frac {\|Av\|}{\|v\|}}~&&:~v\neq 0~&&~{\mbox{ and }}~&&v\in V{\bigg \}}\;\;\;{\text{ this equality holds if and only if }}V\neq \{0\}.\\\end{alignedat}}}$ 

If ${\displaystyle V=\{0\}}$  then the sets in the last two rows will be empty, and consequently their supremums over the set ${\displaystyle [-\infty ,\infty ]}$  will equal ${\displaystyle -\infty }$  instead of the correct value of ${\displaystyle 0.}$  If the supremum is taken over the set ${\displaystyle [0,\infty ]}$  instead, then the supremum of the empty set is ${\displaystyle 0}$  and the formulas hold for any ${\displaystyle V.}$ 

Importantly, a linear operator ${\displaystyle A:V\to W}$  is not, in general, guaranteed to achieve its norm ${\displaystyle \|A\|_{\text{op}}=\sup\{\|Av\|:\|v\|\leq 1,v\in V\}}$  on the closed unit ball ${\displaystyle \{v\in V:\|v\|\leq 1\},}$  meaning that there might not exist any vector ${\displaystyle u\in V}$  of norm ${\displaystyle \|u\|\leq 1}$  such that ${\displaystyle \|A\|_{\text{op}}=\|Au\|}$  (if such a vector does exist and if ${\displaystyle A\neq 0,}$  then ${\displaystyle u}$  would necessarily have unit norm ${\displaystyle \|u\|=1}$ ). R.C. James proved James's theorem in 1964, which states that a Banach space ${\displaystyle V}$  is reflexive if and only if every bounded linear functional ${\displaystyle f\in V^{*}}$  achieves its norm on the closed unit ball.^[4] It follows, in particular, that every non-reflexive Banach space has some bounded linear functional (a type of bounded linear operator) that does not achieve its norm on the closed unit ball.

If ${\displaystyle A:V\to W}$  is bounded then^[5] $${\displaystyle \|A\|_{\text{op}}=\sup \left\{\left|w^{*}(Av)\right|:\|v\|\leq 1,\left\|w^{*}\right\|\leq 1{\text{ where }}v\in V,w^{*}\in W^{*}\right\}}$$  and^[5] $${\displaystyle \|A\|_{\text{op}}=\left\|{}^{t}A\right\|_{\text{op}}}$$  where ${\displaystyle {}^{t}A:W^{*}\to V^{*}}$  is the transpose of ${\displaystyle A:V\to W,}$  which is the linear operator defined by ${\displaystyle w^{*}\,\mapsto \,w^{*}\circ A.}$ 

The operator norm is indeed a norm on the space of all bounded operators between ${\displaystyle V}$  and ${\displaystyle W}$ . This means $${\displaystyle \|A\|_{\text{op}}\geq 0{\mbox{ and }}\|A\|_{\text{op}}=0{\mbox{ if and only if }}A=0,}$$  $${\displaystyle \|aA\|_{\text{op}}=|a|\|A\|_{\text{op}}{\mbox{ for every scalar }}a,}$$  $${\displaystyle \|A+B\|_{\text{op}}\leq \|A\|_{\text{op}}+\|B\|_{\text{op}}.}$$ 

The following inequality is an immediate consequence of the definition: $${\displaystyle \|Av\|\leq \|A\|_{\text{op}}\|v\|\ {\mbox{ for every }}\ v\in V.}$$ 

The operator norm is also compatible with the composition, or multiplication, of operators: if ${\displaystyle V}$ , ${\displaystyle W}$  and ${\displaystyle X}$  are three normed spaces over the same base field, and ${\displaystyle A:V\to W}$  and ${\displaystyle B:W\to X}$  are two bounded operators, then it is a sub-multiplicative norm, that is: $${\displaystyle \|BA\|_{\text{op}}\leq \|B\|_{\text{op}}\|A\|_{\text{op}}.}$$ 

For bounded operators on ${\displaystyle V}$ , this implies that operator multiplication is jointly continuous.

It follows from the definition that if a sequence of operators converges in operator norm, it converges uniformly on bounded sets.

By choosing different norms for the codomain, used in computing ${\displaystyle \|Av\|}$ , and the domain, used in computing ${\displaystyle \|v\|}$ , we obtain different values for the operator norm. Some common operator norms are easy to calculate, and others are NP-hard. Except for the NP-hard norms, all these norms can be calculated in ${\displaystyle N^{2}}$  operations (for an ${\displaystyle N\times N}$  matrix), with the exception of the ${\displaystyle \ell _{2}-\ell _{2}}$  norm (which requires ${\displaystyle N^{3}}$  operations for the exact answer, or fewer if you approximate it with the power method or Lanczos iterations).

The norm of the adjoint or transpose can be computed as follows. We have that for any ${\displaystyle p,q,}$  then ${\displaystyle \|A\|_{p\rightarrow q}=\|A^{*}\|_{q'\rightarrow p'}}$  where ${\displaystyle p',q'}$  are Hölder conjugate to ${\displaystyle p,q,}$  that is, ${\displaystyle 1/p+1/p'=1}$  and ${\displaystyle 1/q+1/q'=1.}$ 

Suppose ${\displaystyle H}$  is a real or complex Hilbert space. If ${\displaystyle A:H\to H}$  is a bounded linear operator, then we have $${\displaystyle \|A\|_{\text{op}}=\left\|A^{*}\right\|_{\text{op}}}$$  and $${\displaystyle \left\|A^{*}A\right\|_{\text{op}}=\|A\|_{\text{op}}^{2},}$$  where ${\displaystyle A^{*}}$  denotes the adjoint operator of ${\displaystyle A}$  (which in Euclidean spaces with the standard inner product corresponds to the conjugate transpose of the matrix ${\displaystyle A}$ ).

In general, the spectral radius of ${\displaystyle A}$  is bounded above by the operator norm of ${\displaystyle A}$ : $${\displaystyle \rho (A)\leq \|A\|_{\text{op}}.}$$ 

To see why equality may not always hold, consider the Jordan canonical form of a matrix in the finite-dimensional case. Because there are non-zero entries on the superdiagonal, equality may be violated. The quasinilpotent operators is one class of such examples. A nonzero quasinilpotent operator ${\displaystyle A}$  has spectrum ${\displaystyle \{0\}.}$  So ${\displaystyle \rho (A)=0}$  while ${\displaystyle \|A\|_{\text{op}}>0.}$ 

However, when a matrix ${\displaystyle N}$  is normal, its Jordan canonical form is diagonal (up to unitary equivalence); this is the spectral theorem. In that case it is easy to see that $${\displaystyle \rho (N)=\|N\|_{\text{op}}.}$$ 

This formula can sometimes be used to compute the operator norm of a given bounded operator ${\displaystyle A}$ : define the Hermitian operator ${\displaystyle B=A^{*}A,}$  determine its spectral radius, and take the square root to obtain the operator norm of ${\displaystyle A.}$ 

The space of bounded operators on ${\displaystyle H,}$  with the topology induced by operator norm, is not separable. For example, consider the Lp space ${\displaystyle L^{2}[0,1],}$  which is a Hilbert space. For ${\displaystyle 0<t\leq 1,}$  let ${\displaystyle \Omega _{t}}$  be the characteristic function of ${\displaystyle [0,t],}$  and ${\displaystyle P_{t}}$  be the multiplication operator given by ${\displaystyle \Omega _{t},}$  that is, $${\displaystyle P_{t}(f)=f\cdot \Omega _{t}.}$$ 

Then each ${\displaystyle P_{t}}$  is a bounded operator with operator norm 1 and $${\displaystyle \left\|P_{t}-P_{s}\right\|_{\text{op}}=1\quad {\mbox{ for all }}\quad t\neq s.}$$ 

But ${\displaystyle \{P_{t}:0<t\leq 1\}}$  is an uncountable set. This implies the space of bounded operators on ${\displaystyle L^{2}([0,1])}$  is not separable, in operator norm. One can compare this with the fact that the sequence space ${\displaystyle \ell ^{\infty }}$  is not separable.

The associative algebra of all bounded operators on a Hilbert space, together with the operator norm and the adjoint operation, yields a C*-algebra.

• Banach–Mazur compactum – Concept in functional analysis
• Continuous linear operator
• Contraction (operator theory) – Bounded operators with sub-unit norm
• Discontinuous linear map
• Dual norm – Measurement on a normed vector space
• Matrix norm – Norm on a vector space of matrices
• Norm (mathematics) – Length in a vector space
• Normed space – Vector space on which a distance is definedPages displaying short descriptions of redirect targets
• Operator algebra – Branch of functional analysis
• Operator theory – Mathematical field of study
• Topologies on the set of operators on a Hilbert space
• Unbounded operator – Linear operator defined on a dense linear subspace

• Aliprantis, Charalambos D.; Border, Kim C. (2007), Infinite Dimensional Analysis: A Hitchhiker's Guide, Springer, p. 229, ISBN 9783540326960.
• Conway, John B. (1990), "III.2 Linear Operators on Normed Spaces", A Course in Functional Analysis, New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 67–69, ISBN 0-387-97245-5
• Diestel, Joe (1984). Sequences and series in Banach spaces. New York: Springer-Verlag. ISBN 0-387-90859-5. OCLC 9556781.
• Rudin, Walter (1991). Functional Analysis. International Series in Pure and Applied Mathematics. Vol. 8 (Second ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Science/Engineering/Math. ISBN 978-0-07-054236-5. OCLC 21163277.