User contributions for 98.156.100.193
Results for 98.156.100.193 talk block log logs global block log filter log
7 April 2019
- 13:1013:10, 7 April 2019 diff hist +8 User talk:CambridgeBayWeather →Carlton Fredericks Website
- 13:0813:08, 7 April 2019 diff hist +7 User talk:CambridgeBayWeather →Carlton Fredericks Website
- 13:0713:07, 7 April 2019 diff hist +1,782 User talk:CambridgeBayWeather →Carlton Fredericks Website
30 March 2019
- 18:0818:08, 30 March 2019 diff hist +250 User talk:CambridgeBayWeather →Carlton Fredericks Website
- 15:1115:11, 30 March 2019 diff hist +24 User talk:CambridgeBayWeather →Carlton Fredericks Website
- 15:1015:10, 30 March 2019 diff hist +1,828 User talk:CambridgeBayWeather →Carlton Fredericks Website: new section
- 01:2201:22, 30 March 2019 diff hist −193 Carlton Fredericks What is your relationship with Quackwatch? Tags: references removed Visual edit
- 00:2000:20, 30 March 2019 diff hist −193 Carlton Fredericks Quackwatch is the website of Stephen Barrett. The article is by Stephen Barrett. This is what "self-published" means. It is not peer reviewed. Moreover, as an advocacy website, it has a particular agenda. It is not a neutral source. Many bad Wikipedia articles do not make a good one. Tags: references removed Visual edit
29 March 2019
- 23:1523:15, 29 March 2019 diff hist −193 Carlton Fredericks See Wikipedia criteria for a reliable source. Self-published media are largely not acceptable." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources#Self-published_sources_(online_and_paper) Tags: references removed Visual edit
- 10:1510:15, 29 March 2019 diff hist −193 Carlton Fredericks No edit summary Tags: references removed Visual edit
- 10:0010:00, 29 March 2019 diff hist −193 Carlton Fredericks No edit summary Tags: references removed Visual edit
- 00:5100:51, 29 March 2019 diff hist −193 Carlton Fredericks No edit summary Tags: references removed Visual edit
27 March 2019
- 22:3522:35, 27 March 2019 diff hist −193 Carlton Fredericks Removed the reference to Fredericks being a heavy smoker and the citation to Quackwatch.org. Quackwatch.org, a personal website that focuses on attacking people deemed by the website owner to be medical "quacks," offers no evidence to support this claim. The New York Times article does not mention smoking. Finally, the conjunction of smoking and heart attack suggests that he died from complications of smoking. No evidence was cited to support such a claim. Tag: references removed
- 11:2311:23, 27 March 2019 diff hist −193 Carlton Fredericks Removed the reference to Fredericks being a heavy smoker and the citation to Quackwatch.org. Quackwatch.org, a personal website that focuses on attacking people deemed by the website owner to be medical "quacks," offers no evidence to support this claim. The New York Times article does not mention smoking. Finally, the conjunction of smoking and heart attack suggests that he died from complications of smoking. No evidence was cited to support such a claim. Tags: references removed Visual edit