Mukhannath: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 816103760 by Hamza Mohib (talk)
Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead. #IABot (v1.6.2) (Balon Greyjoy)
Line 28:
 
According to [[Muhsin Hendricks]]:
{{quote|Muhammad did deal with a group of effeminate men in Medina called "Mukhannathun". However, while this group of Mukhannathun did possess qualities of modern gay men, it cannot be said that the Mukhannathun fully represent modern homosexual men, as they were involved in practices not common to contemporary homosexual men.<ref name="Hendricks">{{cite conference |first=Muhsin |last=Hendricks |authorlink=Muhsin Hendricks|coauthors= |title=Islam and Homosexuality |publisher=ILGA |date=July 2006 |location=ILGA's preconference on religions |url=http://doc.ilga.org/content/download/4522/27322/version/1/file/ILGA-July06-Religions.pdf |accessdate=2007-06-22|format=PDF}}</ref>}}
Some scholars say that, in the case of a mukhannath or intersex individual, if it is not known whether he is male or female, it is not permissible for him to get married; if it becomes clear that he is male, then marriage to him is valid, so long as you{{Who|date=February 2017}} seek advice in such a case from a trustworthy doctor who specializes in hereditary matters and the like, in order to confirm his gender and the possibility of marrying him.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://islamqa.info/en/114670 | title=Ruling on marrying a man who is intersex or impotent, and the difference between them | publisher=islamqa.info | work=[[Muhammad Saalih al-Munajjid]] | accessdate=24 July 2015}}</ref>