Kare Kare

I need help with the taxonomy and naming section of my article. Where do you normally get information on the naming of a species of fish?--Grander13 (talk) 22:40, 18 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Do you know of any more good, reliable sources that I would have access to or you could give me access to? --Grander13 (talk) 22:52, 13 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hello The Catcher, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, they have helped improve Wikipedia and make it more informative. I hope you enjoy using Wikipedia and decide to make additional contributions. Some resources to help new Wikipedians include:

How to edit a page

Editing tutorial

Picture tutorial

How to write a great article

Naming conventions

Manual of Style

As a contributor to Australian articles, you may like to connect with other Australian Wikipedians through the Australian Wikipedians' notice board and take a look at the activities in Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia and associated sub-projects.

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~; this will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you have any questions, please see Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, try the Wikipedia:Help desk, or ask me on my talk page. Or you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Thank you for signing up!

--Mattinbgn/ ^talk 05:16, 26 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks Kare Kare 00:09, 10 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Whyalla council Logo.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:11, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Just noticed all the work you've been putting into South Australian articles and wanted to thank you for your efforts. Happy editing, --cj | talk 14:50, 15 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Cheers Kare Kare 00:09, 10 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Frank1.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. MECU≈talk 18:10, 27 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Coober pedy lga logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 23:42, 16 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

--GeeJo ^(t)⁄_(c) • 20:39, 17 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Streakybaydclogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:30, 21 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi Kare Kare. You are off to such a great start on the article King George whiting that it may qualify to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page under the Did you know... section. The Main Page gets about 4,000,000 hits per day and appearing on the Main Page may help bring publicity and assistance to the article. However, there is a five day from article creation window for Did you know... nominations. Before five days pass from the date the article was created and if you haven't already done so, please consider nominating the article to appear on the Main Page by posting a nomination at Did you know suggestions. If you do nominate the article for DYK, please cross out the article name on the "Good" articles proposed by bot list. Also, don't forget to keep checking back at Did you know suggestions for comments regarding your nomination. Again, great job on the article. -- Jreferee ^(Talk) 17:35, 21 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Any chance of putting these on Wikimedia Commons?

Thank you for uploading images/media to Wikipedia! There is however another Wikimedia foundation project called Wikimedia Commons, a central media repository for all free media. In the future, please consider creating an account and uploading media there instead. That way, all the other language Wikipedias can use them too, as well as our many sister projects. This will also allow our visitors to search for, view and use our media in one central location. If you wish to move previous uploads to Commons, see Wikipedia:Moving images to the Commons. Please note that non-free content, such as images claimed as fair use, cannot be uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons. Help us spread the word about Commons by informing other users, and please continue uploading!

Sfan00 IMG 15:06, 22 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, BTW you do realise that you can use images from commons directly on enwiki via the Image syntax? Sfan00 IMG 11:49, 23 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi Kare Kare. You are off to such a great start on the article Gangetic whiting that it may qualify to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page under the Did you know... section. The Main Page gets about 4,000,000 hits per day and appearing on the Main Page may help bring publicity and assistance to the article. However, there is a five day from article creation window for Did you know... nominations. Before five days pass from the date the article was created and if you haven't already done so, please consider nominating the article to appear on the Main Page by posting a nomination at Did you know suggestions. If you do nominate the article for DYK, please cross out the article name on the "Good" articles proposed by bot list. Also, don't forget to keep checking back at Did you know suggestions for comments regarding your nomination. Again, great job on the article. -- JayHenry 20:08, 22 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

On a related note, I nominated the article Sillago for Did you know... It may appear on the Main Page within the next four days, with no further action required from you. Cheers! --Ginkgo100^talk 23:37, 22 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Well done. Interesting article and we always need more science on the main page. Enjoy, Blnguyen (bananabucket) 07:35, 26 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

You are a fish creating machine! One of your recent articles Western trumpeter whiting would also be great for DYK. --JayHenry 04:46, 10 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hey Kare Kare, I thought I'd let you know that I've devised a hook and added your wonderful picture of the Gangetic whiting to the DYK suggestion page. I noticed it in the "Good articles" proposed by bots, and it wasn't hard to find something interesting about the species. I'm sure within a few days, it'll be on the main page. Cheers! Alekjds ^talk 18:22, 24 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi Kare Kare. You are off to such a great start on the article Silver-banded whiting that it may qualify to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page under the Did you know... section. The Main Page gets about 4,000,000 hits per day and appearing on the Main Page may help bring publicity and assistance to the article. However, there is a five day from article creation window for Did you know... nominations. Before five days pass from the date the article was created and if you haven't already done so, please consider nominating the article to appear on the Main Page by posting a nomination at Did you know suggestions. If you do nominate the article for DYK, please cross out the article name on the "Good" articles proposed by bot list. Also, don't forget to keep checking back at Did you know suggestions for comments regarding your nomination. Again, great job on the article. -- Jreferee ^(Talk) 13:02, 27 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Honestly, i don't really see the point; there have been two DYK about Sillaginidae taxa in the past week, and as i create this series of articles, it seems pretty pointless to keep creating DYK suggestions for all of them. They aren't exactly the most exciting of animals to most people. Anyway, if someone thinks differently, let me know. Cheers 14:32, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Hi Kare Kare. You are off to such a great start on the article Slender whiting and Asian whiting that it may qualify to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page under the Did you know... section. The Main Page gets about 4,000,000 hits per day and appearing on the Main Page may help bring publicity and assistance to the article. However, there is a five day from article creation window for Did you know... nominations. Before five days pass from the date the article was created and if you haven't already done so, please consider nominating the article to appear on the Main Page by posting a nomination at Did you know suggestions. If you do nominate the article for DYK, please cross out the article name on the "Good" articles proposed by bot list. Also, don't forget to keep checking back at Did you know suggestions for comments regarding your nomination. Again, great job on the article. -- Jreferee ^(Talk) 01:31, 29 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Good job with the whiting articles. You're doing a really good job. BTW, it would be great if you could add any DYK articles to the list at the bottom of the WikiProject Fish page so that we can keep track. ;) Also, check out the WP:FISH page for how to use the FishBase template to link to FishBase pages; personally I find it preferable and neater. MiltonT 03:36, 29 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Cool, and thanks! I worked out the fishbase template for the last few articles and will keep using it. Cheers Kare Kare 07:15, 29 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Greetings. I left a note for you here. All the best, – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 21:49, 5 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for those papers. I've used them and rolled the info into the halfbeak article in many places. Very useful! Cheers, Neale Neale Monks 10:58, 10 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your help on the List of introduced fish in Australia! I am currently attempting to get it listed as a Featured List, and any help would be appreciated. Abbott75 ☺ 06:08, 14 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Well i would suggest you to add up some content in the lead. for more info take a look at - WP:LEAD. Also the section, namely importance to humans should be moved to simply - importance. rest, the article is up to the mark. thanks, Sushant gupta 17:00, 25 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

why only importance to humans, i think you should also mention about ecological importance also. thanks, Sushant gupta 14:05, 26 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

firstly don't say that its useless. secondaly you must be knowing better about the article requirements as per WP:FISH so thats why i think it should continue like this only. thanks, Sushant gupta 11:05, 27 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

--Peta 23:56, 30 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks again Kare Kare. This article kindly nomintaed by Colcicum. Do feel free to slef nom in future. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 02:27, 13 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:PAug_logo.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ~ Wikihermit 01:53, 7 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Tiataralogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:42, 16 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Lower EP Logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:47, 3 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

--Carabinieri 00:07, 8 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Cool... thanks! Kare Kare 01:18, 11 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

I'm not a member of the biota project, so I'm not 100% sure of their definite rules for inclusion.I just tagged that article in passing. Any help with tagging and assessing articles is appreciated. -- Longhair\^talk 10:55, 12 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

--Royalbroil 12:48, 16 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

--Allen3 ^talk 15:15, 17 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

--chaser - t 16:17, 29 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Blnguyen (bananabucket) 06:26, 30 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi Kare Kare,

Thanks for the message. You caught me in the middle of a little re-jiggle, hence the duplication. I found the original layout ambiguous and rather confusing and also felt that a 'disambiguation', or perhaps 'list' page would be a more suitable (and standard) place to develop a more complete listing of the various whitings which occur around the world. I hope my intentions, as well as the articles are a little more clear now that I have finished! —Preceding unsigned comment added by IonaJane (talk • contribs) 05:08, 4 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

I'm glad you understand and appreciate my intentions! It is good to see someone looking after Wikipedia too. Re. pointing the whiting (fish) redirect at the disambiguation page. Would a 'Whiting (fish) redirects here, for other fish called whiting see whiting (fish) (disambiguation).' at the top of the Merlangius_merlangus page satisfy your concerns? Isn't this usual in cases where numerous things have all been named after one common predecessor? Part of the problem I with the original layout was the excessive drill down which it took to get from whiting to the article about the fish called whiting (Merlangius_merlangus). Obviously the names of the other types of whiting such as Sillago, pollock, hake, pacific whiting et al. can, and should, lead directly to their articles so why do you feel it necessary to bury the Merlangius_merlangus so deeply? IonaJane 05:48, 4 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! I know you are just trying to protect Wikipedia - honourable intentions indeed.

I'm glad you see the method to my initial madness. I have made the changes we discussed to Merlangius_merlangus and will revert Whiting (fish) to point to it as you approve of this. Please have a quick glance at the changes to make certain they satisfy your concerns. I agree completely about expanding on the descriptions in the main whiting disambiguation and will do that now, if you haven't beaten me to it. I'm delighted that you are going to develop the Whiting (fish) (disambiguation) list as I was about to do the same but you seem eminently more qualified! Keep up the good work IonaJane 06:26, 4 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Whiting updated appropriately, I shall leave the fish list to you for reasons already given! I'm pleased we've found a way to simplify that double disambiguation route to Merlangius_merlangus. I agree that it should now be clear to anyone arriving at that article by mistake when looking for another whiting that that one isn't theirs. It may even be of interest to them to find the whiting their whiting was named after... it has certainly interested me and I'm looking forward to seeing your finished list. IonaJane 06:57, 4 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your input. Seriously, you have a lot more experience at this than I. I was reading What is a good article?, and for broad coverage, note 3 says that "This requirement is significantly weaker" than for FA's. On Good vs. Featured, it says, in regard to GA, "the broad standard merely requires coverage of main points". I'm not suggesting that the article is a great article, but I believe it (barely) meets GA. Do you think I'm being overly generous in my interpretation? In light of the details I've presented here, I'd genuinely like your opinion. Cheers and thanks in advance! Mmoyer 02:09, 6 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for the detailed suggestions for improvement you left on my talk page. I will use these to full advantage to improve the article. I greatly appreciate your willingness to share your knowledge - it's editors like you who make Wikipedia a fun place to be. Have a wiki day! Mmoyer 19:34, 6 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Do you still need Erickson et al (2001) "Dinosaurian growth patterns and rapid avian growth rates." Nature 412: 429-433 doi:10.1038/35086558?

If so, i have it and have scanned through it. It has a bit on growth rates of Massospondylus, but not much on the actual mass. It does have a ref to a paper which has supposedly calculated the mass:
Chinsamy (1993) A. Bone histology and growth trajectory of the prosauropod dinosaur Massospondylus carinatus Owen. Modern Geology 18, 319-329

If you need the paper, just yell and i'll get it to you via email. Cheers Kare Kare 12:44, 7 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi Kare Kare!

Wow, I didn't think anyone had it, and I'm really surprised a comment that old was responded to. First of all, thank you for your generous offer. I'd like to take you up on it. I will use the Wikipedia e-mail function to give you my e-mail address.

Although I was hoping it would have some mass calculations, even if it doesn't, there may be some useful information in there that I can add to the Massospondylus article. I'd like this article to be as comprehensive as possible, and it won't be without the papers which discuss it. So I really appreciate your offer.

I did find some mass calculations for Massospondylus in Seebacher (2001) "A new method to calculate allometric length-mass relationships of dinosaurs" Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 21(1) 51–60, but that was based on a 4 meter length for Massospondylus, while some other sources give longer lengths for it. Obviously, if a second opinion exists on weight, I'd like to have it. It's too bad the paper doesn't have it, but I will be on the lookout for Chinsamy (1993). Thanks for the tip.

Best wishes, Firsfron of Ronchester 16:31, 7 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

--Nice work. Good to see some of the more empty fields of knowledge getting filled in. GeeJo ^(t)⁄_(c) • 19:31, 7 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

I just came across this article that seems to be an offshoot of the origin of birds page. It deals with Deinonychosauria and the fact they are mostly Creatceous in origin while aves were up and running by the end of the Jarassic. Therefore aves could't have evolved from deinonychosaurs etc etc. Anyway it's not Dino tagged and in need of formatting, so i will leave it with you. Kare Kare 08:45, 11 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the head's-up. I don't even know what to do with this article. It certainly is a mess. Seems like most of this topic is covered at Origin of birds... Firsfron of Ronchester 08:54, 11 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

I brought this up at WT:DINO. Feel free to comment. I'm glad this was brought to someone's attention. We could even ask the bird people for input. Firsfron of Ronchester 09:07, 11 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

--Zzyzx11 (Talk) 22:11, 18 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions! Nishkid64 (talk) 19:10, 19 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Cheers, Blnguyen (bananabucket) 02:57, 21 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:PAug logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:08, 29 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi Kare Kare. Thanks for educating me on fish identification. I'm none more than a connoisseur of sea food. :-) I went by this common name in Malayalam to come to that conclusion. The shop was run by a Malayalee and he said it's "paara". Perhaps he meant this fish which is "paarai" in Tamil language and he knows I'm Tamil. :-) And in Tamil "paarai" is more of a generic name. Sorry for the confusion. -- Sundar ^{\talk \contribs} 03:32, 30 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Sure, will do. Looking at these fishes, I think that one belongs to the genus Caranx. In any case, the image needs to be renamed to something else now. -- Sundar ^{\talk \contribs} 05:56, 30 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

 

 

I've uploaded a couple more photos of probably Carangidae. Please try identifying them. -- Sundar ^{\talk \contribs} 05:01, 1 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your encouragement. I've added the identification information and Category:Carangidae in commons. However, I'm not sure how to move these to appropriate pages. Do I have to reupload them and mark the existing ones for deletion? -- Sundar ^{\talk \contribs} 07:31, 1 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Yep, I've sorted them out. Thanks. -- Sundar ^{\talk \contribs} 13:09, 2 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Whyalla council Logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:25, 30 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

--Carabinieri (talk) 12:44, 8 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Small-scale whiting, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: User:Kare Kare/sandbox. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:21, 22 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Coonalpyn downs2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:43, 22 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

--Royalbroil 05:33, 29 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions! Nishkid64 (talk) 07:23, 31 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi. I've nominated Cleftbelly trevally, an article you worked on, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Wikipedia:Did you know. You can see the hook for the article at Template talk:Did you know#Articles created/expanded on January 1, where you can improve it if you see fit. Thanks, PFHLai (talk) 23:58, 1 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

P.S. Please be encouraged to nominate your future contributions to DYK. You need just a few more articles to qualify for a medal. Cheers! --PFHLai (talk) 23:58, 1 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

I'll tell you what. I'll keep creating articles and you can keep nominating them as soon as they appear on the bot list. I can never come up with good hooks for articles, and usually forget about it anyway. Kare Kare (talk) 08:50, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

--Daniel Case (talk) 15:48, 8 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

I've noticed the image you added to the Bar jack, along with many other illustrations (Cleftbelly trevally,ect.) and I Really enjoy them. Could you possibly do an illustration for the Horse-eye jack? I'd be greatful if you wouldRyan shell (talk) 17:33, 7 January 2008 (UTC) P.S. if you need a picture to work with, let me know.Reply

--Royalbroil 14:32, 10 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

--Wizardman 02:39, 11 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Good idea! I'll try and move the article to Black jack (fish), but i'm at lunch right now and i may not have time to do it until to night. thanks,Ryan shell (talk) 17:30, 1 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

You're pic look perfect, thanks again. as for the tail color, i checked my references and all but one of them describes the fish as yellow-tailed (the one that did not had a picture of the Horse-eye jack with a yellow tail), so i changed the description section slightly. Anyway, you picture look great and if you're ever bored, i'll probably have a fish article in need of illustration. Ryan shell (talk) 14:39, 2 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

P.S. your Yellowtail scad picture (and article) both look great.

Congrats! Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 15:26, 2 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Congrats! Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 02:37, 6 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, g'day.

I've just bunged this stuff in because I'm not a fly fisherman and I couldn't get one to hold my hand. I'll do another round later on commercial fish - you're very welcome to correct me on any I get wrong.

What's a bloody Aussie doing with a username like Karekare. That beach is my spiritual home! --Geronimo20 (talk) 13:06, 20 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Add it to 1000 odd pages! Nah. I'll just settle it down to say the top twelve. It has "Other targets..." at the bottom, which goes to the category list :p --Geronimo20 (talk) 13:39, 20 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for uploading Image:Alex Council Logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 20:21, 20 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

I've changes the phrase as you suggested. you're right i did read in a little much. let me know if there's anything else. Peace! Ryan shell (talk) 21:08, 27 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

--BorgQueen (talk) 23:55, 7 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

--Gatoclass (talk) 06:53, 18 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

--BorgQueen (talk) 13:01, 30 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

--Gatoclass (talk) 14:48, 1 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

thanks for the warning, i'll be sure to use microsoft word al little more often. also, AdultSwim kinda seems like an asshole to me! peace! Ryan shell (talk) 19:17, 20 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

--Congratulations! PeterSymonds (talk) 19:27, 26 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks Jay, although some credit should go to those who nominated the articles for DYK, i'm terribe at finding interesting hooks for articles. The whole ocean? lol. I think there are only a few thousand red linked fish articles left, but we'll get there eventually. Kare Kare (talk) 01:56, 3 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

--Gatoclass (talk) 15:30, 4 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

• Nice article, very comprehensive! - House of Scandal (talk) 19:04, 4 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

I'd say it is possible to write that article. However, it would not be so much on the species as on the name. Basically you'd have a more detailed retelling of the confusion and a summary of the current highly disputed status, and details regarding the purported differences between the species, but not treating it as a fully legit species. WP:DINO has articles on a number of nomina nuda, dubia, and misattributions you can look at (e.g. Angaturama, Antrodemus, Apatodon, Arkansaurus). Circeus (talk) 04:36, 9 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't think "ciliarius" is a feminine specific... As an aside, Citula is briefly mentioned in this and C. armatus, but there is no details at all anywhere about it. Maybe something in one of those articles or Carangidae to quickly describe what happened to it (i.e. was it split between several genera, was it meged in another?). Circeus (talk) 21:01, 9 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

--Gatoclass (talk) 12:05, 16 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

--Jordan ^Contribs 18:04, 20 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

--BorgQueen (talk) 22:48, 26 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

--BorgQueen (talk) 05:53, 27 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi Kare Kare,

Regarding your image: Roxby_Downs_LGA.png

I hope that I'm doing this the right way and excuse me if not. I would like to let you know that the image of Local Government Areas illustrating the location of Roxby Downs Council is incorrect. The image actually shows Coober Pedy Council although you have denoted it as Roxby Downs. The other enclave to the south-east of the one you have marked on the South Australian LGA map is the correct location of Roxby Downs. I wasn't sure how to change it so I thought I'd let you know...hope this is OK! Johnsp1 (talk) 15:39, 2 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Cirt (talk) 10:24, 3 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I like your cute illustration very much and appreciate your contributions. Keep up the good work! --Caspian blue (talk) 16:06, 3 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

You should be OK to edit now. Tim Vickers (talk) 17:55, 4 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Cheers! Royalbroil 20:06, 1 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Mifter (talk) 02:20, 2 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Gatoclass (talk) 08:18, 2 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Gatoclass (talk) 00:37, 3 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

This is the third time this has happened - is it possible to remove my username from blocks affecting this IP? I know its only a short period block, but annoying nontheless.

Cheers, Kare Kare (talk) 23:31, 4 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

• Note to admins - consider granting an IP block exception; good contributor constantly blocked. I really have no opinion in this but... Tohd8BohaithuGh1 (talk) 23:35, 4 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks to whoever unblocked me, much appreciated. Cheers Kare Kare (talk) 23:51, 4 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

It wasn't me, but I was about to take care of it myself. In response to the IP Exemption thing, we only grant that in exceptional cases, where the user is either completely unable to edit due to an IP block we really can't remove due to the situation that led to the block, or when the autoblocks are becoming so frequent it causes nearly the same level of difficulty. Since I can only see two instances of an autoblock on this talk page (I know you said three, but I'm not seeing it), there doesn't seem to be enough disruption to your editing to grant it just yet. We may consider if this continues in the future, however. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 23:58, 4 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

• Sorry, had to step out for a moment before I could note my action, here. ;) It's difficult to prove a lack of relationship with certainty, given the circumstances, but I poked around a bit and everything checks out, so far. Releasing the autoblock, for now. Will look into longer-term solutions. Apologies for the inconvenience. – Luna Santin (talk) 00:02, 5 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

I'm not too worried, its far better than the last autoblock i was hit with... it lasted 2 days and i couldn't even edit my talk page. In the end i just had to wait til' it expired. Thanks for unblocking me anyway! Cheers Kare Kare (talk) 00:34, 5 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi Kare Kare, as the result of a gentle rollback I performed on the article Galah, Victoria a friendly discussion has ensued here. Whilst it may not ultimately be the best location for such a communication to fully develop, for now, if you have the time and/or interest, can you provide your thoughts also? With thanks. --VS ^talk 09:39, 12 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi Kare Kare, Geronimo suggested that I ask you to take a look at this rather nice-looking fish, here it is. I was asked about it by Mbz1 (talk). She (Mila) took the image at an aquarium in the San Francisco Academy of Sciences, but does not know where the fish was from, other than that. I told her I am pretty useless on ID-ing most fishes (I am mostly a mollusk person). Thanks for any help you can give. Best to you, Invertzoo (talk) 22:41, 2 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

--Dravecky (talk) 08:10, 23 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

--Dravecky (talk) 08:05, 27 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Shubinator (talk) 06:39, 26 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

pic! Victuallers (talk) 17:54, 27 April 2009 (UTC) Victuallers (talk) 17:54, 27 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Shubinator (talk) 22:24, 27 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Shubinator (talk) 16:29, 29 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Jamie^☆S93 15:49, 18 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Dravecky (talk) 06:56, 22 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

--PFHLai (talk) 05:45, 27 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Dravecky (talk) 20:21, 28 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, I'm an admirer of your work also. I actually haven't heard of this "outline" thing before, but Portal:Contents/Outline of knowledge suggests it's supposed to be a table of contents of sorts for the topic. I agree that the current shark outline needs a lot of work, but it has a construction tag, and I'm not familiar enough with the outline project in general (personally I don't really see the point, but apparently others do) to know whether it would meet deletion criteria. Maybe wait and see where it goes? -- Yzx (talk) 22:32, 11 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Wikiproject: Did you know? 09:21, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tiataralocus.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 09:25, 20 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Coober pedy lga logo2.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 16:35, 1 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Coorongdc logo.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 16:45, 1 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Nice to see you around again. I missed reading your articles. Circéus (talk) 06:13, 16 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Good to know. Real life kept me away for a while, but i should be able to keep a steady flow of articles up this year. Kare Kare (talk) 10:04, 16 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:KG whiting.jpg appears to have been uploaded under the wrong license. DrKiernan (talk) 10:45, 21 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

You asked for a source at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Resource_Exchange/Resource_Request#April 2009. Please revisit.LeadSongDog come howl! 15:21, 29 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi Kare Kare, I hope you're well. My name is Aaron and I'm one of the Storytellers working on the 2011 fundraiser for the Wikimedia Foundation. For this year's campaign, we're interviewing as many of the very active and productive Wikipedians as we can to broaden the range of appeals we run come November. I wonder if you would want to tell me more about your experiences editing and writing here? If so, I'll ask you your personal story and I'll ask you some general questions about Wikipedia. Please let me know if you're interesting by emailing amuszalski wikimedia.org. Thanks! user:Aaron (WMF)

Hey, just wanted to say I'm glad you're still alive! I've missed reading your article. Circéus (talk) 18:54, 25 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Fringefin trevally (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Gladstone, Convex, West Papua, Specific epithet, Angler and William Macleay

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:10, 5 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Longrakered trevally (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Marine, Convex, Specific epithet and William Macleay

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 19 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Horse-eye jack, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Specific epithet (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 29 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Goyder LGA logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:31, 4 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Wikipedia:WikiProject Oceania/The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/The 5000 Challenge are up and running based on Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge which has currently produced over 2300 article improvements and creations. The Australia challenge would feed into the wider region one and potentially New Zealand could have a smaller challenge too. The main goal is content improvement, tackling stale old stubs and important content and improving sourcing/making more consistent but new articles are also welcome if sourced. I understand that this is a big goal for regular editors, especially being summertime where you are, but if you'd like to see large scale quality improvements happening for Oceania and Australia like The Africa Destubathon, which has produced over 1700 articles in 5 weeks, sign up on the page. The idea will be an ongoing national editathon/challenge for the region but fuelled by a series of contests to really get articles on every province and subject mass improved. The Africa contest scaled worldwide would naturally provide great benefits to Oceania countries, particularly Australia and attract new editors. I would like some support from existing editors here to get the Challenges off to a start with some articles to make doing a Destubathon worthwhile and potentially bring about hundreds of improvements in a few weeks through a contest! Cheers.♦ --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:12, 24 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Whyalla council Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:08, 29 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Ceduna DC logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:31, 7 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Kimba dc logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 12 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:DC yankalilla logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 14 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

The file File:WhyallaDCBoundary.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 30 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

The file File:Tumby BayLGA.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 22 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

The file File:KI council.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 17 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

The file File:PtLincolnLGA2.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 24 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

The file File:NC position.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 15 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

The file File:NC position.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 8 February 2020 (UTC)Reply