Leif Runenritzer

Hello, welcome to Wiktionary, and thank you for your contributions so far.

If you are unfamiliar with wiki-editing, take a look at Help:How to edit a page. It is a concise list of technical guidelines to the wiki format we use here: how to, for example, make text boldfaced or create hyperlinks. Feel free to practice in the sandbox. If you would like a slower introduction we have a short tutorial.

These links may help you familiarize yourself with Wiktionary:

• Entry layout (EL) is a detailed policy on Wiktionary's page formatting; all entries must conform to it. The easiest way to start off is to copy the contents of an existing same-language entry, and then adapt it to fit the entry you are creating.
• Check out Language considerations to find out more about how to edit for a particular language.
• Our Criteria for Inclusion (CFI) defines exactly which words can be added to Wiktionary; the most important part is that Wiktionary only accepts words that have been in somewhat widespread use over the course of at least a year, and citations that demonstrate usage can be asked for when there is doubt.
• If you already have some experience with editing our sister project Wikipedia, then you may find our guide for Wikipedia users useful.
• If you have any questions, bring them to Wiktionary:Information desk or ask me on my talk page.
• Whenever commenting on any discussion page, please sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~) which automatically produces your username and timestamp.
• You are encouraged to add a BabelBox to your userpage to indicate your self-assessed knowledge of languages.

Enjoy your stay at Wiktionary! Ƿidsiþ 08:26, 18 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Please do not eliminate a foreign language entry to add an English one. Also, please only add a language category to a page with an entry in that language. --EncycloPetey 00:47, 6 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Yes, much better. The bot AutoFormat cleanup up some details, if you care to look, but the general entry was correct this time around. --EncycloPetey 01:04, 6 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

The main resources for getting citations that are convenient for acceptance for "attestation" are Google's "Books" search and Google's "News" search. Also www.corpus.byu.edu. What is difficult is to get quotes that illustrate technical details without being mere "mentions". The approach of looking at the models mentioned in proximity to the term assault rifle and determining the most common characteristics might well work. I would pick the three most common (AK-47 is certainly one.) and air the result of your analysis at the RfV discussion. If it is accepted in principle, it might then be worth refining. I will be happy to help if it is worth your time.

One reason why technical glossaries will continue to exist is that their approach differs from that of a general dictionary, which has to be principally descriptive of actual usage. DCDuring TALK 10:31, 24 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

This is how you do it if the word in question isn't derived from the listed language: with a hyphen. HTH.​—msh210℠ 20:28, 29 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

I don't see any reason to call this "related" to clock. If there is a relationship, it would be apparent from the etymology, but that isn't the case. --EncycloPetey 01:59, 19 August 2010 (UTC)Reply