View source for Talk:Parabolic reflector

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:

This IP address has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.
This does not affect your ability to read Wikipedia pages.
Most people who see this message have done nothing wrong. Some kinds of blocks restrict editing from specific service providers or telecom companies in response to recent abuse or vandalism, and can sometimes affect other users who are unrelated to that abuse. Review the information below for assistance if you do not believe that you have done anything wrong.

The IP address or range 52.54.0.0/16 has been blocked by ‪JJMC89‬ for the following reason(s):

The IP address that you are currently using has been blocked because it is believed to be a web host provider or colocation provider. To prevent abuse, web hosts and colocation providers may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
You will not be able to edit Wikipedia using a web host or colocation provider because it hides your IP address, much like a proxy or VPN.
We recommend that you attempt to use another connection to edit. For example, if you use a proxy or VPN to connect to the internet, turn it off when editing Wikipedia. If you edit using a mobile connection, try using a Wi-Fi connection, and vice versa. If you are using a corporate internet connection, switch to a different Wi-Fi network. If you have a Wikipedia account, please log in.
If you do not have any other way to edit Wikipedia, you will need to request an IP block exemption.

How to appeal if you are confident that your connection does not use a colocation provider's IP address:
If you are confident that you are not using a web host, you may appeal this block by adding the following text on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Caught by a colocation web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is _______. Place any further information here. ~~~~}}. You must fill in the blank with your IP address for this block to be investigated. Your IP address can be determined here. Alternatively, if you wish to keep your IP address private you can use the unblock ticket request system. There are several reasons you might be editing using the IP address of a web host or colocation provider (such as if you are using VPN software or a business network); please use this method of appeal only if you think your IP address is in fact not a web host or colocation provider.

Administrators: The IP block exemption user right should only be applied to allow users to edit using web host in exceptional circumstances, and requests should usually be directed to the functionaries team via email. If you intend to give the IPBE user right, a CheckUser needs to take a look at the account. This can be requested most easily at SPI Quick Checkuser Requests. Unblocking an IP or IP range with this template is highly discouraged without at least contacting the blocking administrator.

This block will expire on 05:24, 2 February 2025. Your current IP address is 52.54.118.102.

Even when blocked, you will usually still be able to edit your user talk page, as well as email administrators and other editors.

For information on how to proceed, please read the FAQ for blocked users and the guideline on block appeals. The guide to appealing blocks may also be helpful.

Other useful links: Blocking policy · Help:I have been blocked
This IP address range has been globally blocked.
This does not affect your ability to read Wikipedia pages.
Most people who see this message have done nothing wrong. Some kinds of blocks restrict editing from specific service providers or telecom companies in response to recent abuse or vandalism, and can sometimes affect other users who are unrelated to that abuse. Review the information below for assistance if you do not believe that you have done anything wrong.

This block affects editing on all Wikimedia wikis.
The IP address or range 52.54.0.0/16 has been globally blocked by ‪Jon Kolbert‬ for the following reason(s):

Open proxy/Webhost: See the help page if you are affected

This block will expire on 05:38, 21 February 2029. Your current IP address is 52.54.118.102.

Even while globally blocked, you will usually still be able to edit pages on Meta-Wiki.

If you believe you were blocked by mistake, you can find additional information and instructions in the No open proxies global policy. Otherwise, to discuss the block please post a request for review on Meta-Wiki. You could also send an email to the stewards VRT queue at stewards@wikimedia.org including all above details.

Other useful links: Global blocks · Help:I have been blocked

You can view and copy the source of this page:

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|
{{WikiProject Technology}}
}}
== Stub? ==

This article seems more like a stub to me, but the links were extremely useful.  Maybye add a description of how this works (the angle of incidence = the angle of reflection)


== Practical Uses ==

Maybe more practical uses and images should be added.
Such as how Archimedes used mirrors in a parabolic path to catch invading Roman ships on fire, solar ovens, etc.

I was looking for more information on how parabolic reflectors create a virtual image as seen in the wok pan illusion.  Any explanation or diagrams of this?
::This is interesting [[appropedia:Aleiha's parabolic solar cooker]]. [[User:Bawolff|Bawolff]] 00:52, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

==Figure==

I'm sorry to say, but the figure [[:Image:Parabolic reflection 1.svg]] is just terrible. While it expresses the general idea of the parabolic reflector, the position of the focal point is such that the law of reflection is painfully disobeyed, with the reflected ray on the same side  of the normal as the incoming ray. A similar problem appears in [[:Image:Waves reflecting from a curved mirror.PNG]] (which now I notice was drawn by the same user). — [[User:AdiJapan|<span style="color:#0000C0;">Adi</span><span style="color:#8080FF;">Japan</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:AdiJapan|<span style="color:#4040FF;">☎</span>]] 11:45, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
:I agree. I have proposed deletion of both images. Inaccurate illustrations of technical subjects are worse than useless.--[[User:Srleffler|Srleffler]] ([[User talk:Srleffler|talk]]) 04:54, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

== Useful reference? ==

A possibly useful reference for this article: 
*{{cite journal |url=http://journals.royalsociety.org/content/y74836x541361423/fulltext.pdf |format=pdf | title=An account of experiments on the reflecting telescope |author=Lord Oxmantown |journal=Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London |volume=130 |publisher=The Royal Society, |pages=503–27, esp. p. 522 |year=1840 |doi=10.1098/rstl.1840.0023}}

This appears to be an early effort at the manufacture of a large non-spherical reflector. --[[User:Srleffler|Srleffler]] ([[User talk:Srleffler|talk]]) 04:57, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

== Reducing tracking problems by using a Compound Parabolic Mirror ==

Their size and lack of electricity means that solar cookers and solar furnaces have problems tracking the sun.  (Solar cookers are frequently adjusted by hand every few minutes.)  By using a much deeper bowl and a more complex shape the sun can be with in 30<sup><small>o</small></sup> or 45<sup><small>o</small></sup> of the centre of the mirror.  The Compound Parabolic shape is made by merging two parabolas with the same focal point.
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uX9Z-nsUHiA Compound Parabolic Mirror video]

[[User:Andrew Swallow|Andrew Swallow]] ([[User talk:Andrew Swallow|talk]]) 07:15, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

== Possible Application? ==
This might be a good reference link to real-world applications of the paraboloid algorithm, but I leave it to more learned minds to decide: http://www.freeantennas.com/projects/template/
--[[User:Rvolz|Roland]] ([[User talk:Rvolz|talk]]) 18:58, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

== Off-axis parabolic mirrors ==

Probably worth adding something about ''off-axis'' parabolic reflectors [http://www.edmundoptics.com/optics/optical-mirrors/focusing-concave-mirrors/off-axis-parabolic-metal-mirrors/2307].  The focal point of a full paraboloidal mirror lies in the path of the incident collimated beam, meaning that a receiver/detector placed at this point will block part of the incident energy.  The [[:File:Parabola_with_focus_and_arbitrary_line.svg|figure in the article]] illustrates how an off-axis paraboloid (i.e., a section of a full parabolic reflector) focuses radiation to a point outside the incident beam, meaning that the detector does not cast a shadow. 

Separate article perhaps... or is that overkill? [[User:Papa November|Papa November]] ([[User talk:Papa November|talk]]) 10:45, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

::It's mentioned in the [[Rotating furnace]] article, about making parabolic reflectors by rotating molten glass. Off-axis reflectors are made by rotating the container of glass about an axis that does not pass through it. `[[User:DOwenWilliams|DOwenWilliams]] ([[User talk:DOwenWilliams|talk]]) 21:30, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

::Ok. I've added a few lines about off-axis reflectors. [[User:DOwenWilliams|DOwenWilliams]] ([[User talk:DOwenWilliams|talk]]) 01:39, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

::: Great! Thanks :) [[User:Papa November|Papa November]] ([[User talk:Papa November|talk]]) 16:21, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

== Surface area ==

The article mentions the volume of a parabolic dish, but not the surface area. I don't know if this would be useful, but suppose I wanted to paint the surface of a dish, how would I work out how many m<sup>2</sup> of paint to buy? I tried to derive it but it doesn't seem correct, I got: <math> A = \frac{4}{3}\pi r h</math> does that sound right? I doesn't to me... (h is height of dish, from vertex to centre of opening, r is radius at opening)
--[[User:Jamietwells|Jamietwells]] ([[User talk:Jamietwells|talk]]) 12:23, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

:There's a good reason why this calculation is not given in the article. It's difficult to do. Probably the least difficult way would be to program a computer to grind out a numerical value by summing the areas of a lot of "hoops" around the dish. Or you could just buy a lot of paint. [[User:DOwenWilliams|DOwenWilliams]] ([[User talk:DOwenWilliams|talk]]) 15:00, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

:::You may like to look at this:

::::http://www.appropedia.org/Focus-balanced_paraboloid

:::It's something I wrote years go that does a similar calculation. You should be able to modify it to do what you want.

:::[[User:DOwenWilliams|DOwenWilliams]] ([[User talk:DOwenWilliams|talk]]) 20:24, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

::::"program a computer to grind out a numerical value by summing the areas of a lot of "hoops" around the dish." Could we not just find an expression for the area of the hoops in terms of the distance from the vertex and then integrate? Or is that not possible? I'm not sure I trust the source you linked to. There are no references and I don't understand QBasic. Also his maths is a bit vague (undefined terms etc) Do you understand it? Could you explain it? I came to this article to find the equation for the area of a parabolic dish, but it wasn't mentioned and it also didn't say why it wasn't here. Perhaps even just a note to say that the area formula is very complicated but an approximate result exists? (With a reference to that same information from a trusted source)
::::--[[User:Jamietwells|Jamietwells]] ([[User talk:Jamietwells|talk]]) 08:01, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

As I said above, the reference I gave is to something that *I* wrote, years ago. It wouldn't be acceptable in the main body of Wikipedia, but on talk pages, the rules are more relaxed. As I said in the article, my result was confirmed, to an accuracy of ten significant digits, by a university mathematician, who used a different method, so I don't think there's any doubt that the result is correct.

If you read through the explanation I wrote, before the program itself, you'll find an expression for the area of a single "hoop". If you can integrate that to find an expression for the area of the dish, then that's all you have to do to solve your problem. But integrating that expression is not something that can be done by any method of which I am aware. That's why I chose to do a numerical summation, using a computer. You could do the same.

You asked a question, and I tried to help you to find the answer. Now you are criticizing what I wrote and demanding that I do more for you. No. It's your problem. You solve it.

[[User:DOwenWilliams|DOwenWilliams]] ([[User talk:DOwenWilliams|talk]]) 15:09, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

:That was certainly my mistake, I had forgotten (after reading the page you linked to) that you had said you wrote it. I suppose to then say that I don't trust the author probably seems quite offensive now. I didn't mean to offend you, but I still do not trust that your calculations are correct without understanding them. Or rather, I don't want an answer, I want an understanding of how to find the answer, so even if I trusted you had done it correctly I still wouldn't be satisfied. I don't need the answer, I'm just curious about the expression for the area of a parabolic dish as a mathematical idea.

:You say I'm criticising what you wrote, and I get why you would say that, and I suppose I am, but what I'm really criticising is the article. ''sigh'' this is quite difficult to explain when written...

:I'm trying to say, when I went looking for the Wikipedia article I was looking for one fact in particular, specifically the expression for the area of a parabolic dish. When I didn't find it I asked on the talk page, and you very kindly tried to help, but unfortunately you've not been able to because I wasn't able to follow or understand the page you linked to (which I'd forgotten you said you wrote so asked if you understood it and was probably more blunt than I should have been). This is my failing, I'm fully aware of that, and if you can't explain your calculation, or don't want to, then that is totally fine, I can't force you to give up your time to help me. When I talked about adding "a note to say that the area formula is very complicated" I was talking about improving [[Parabolic_reflector|this]] page, and it was just a suggestion that adding why we haven't included the area calculation in the article might help future visitors who come to the article. I'm not brave enough to edit pages myself in case I ruin someone's work, so I usually suggest edits on the talk pages. That's all I was doing.

:I'm really not trying to demand you do work for me, honestly. I think this has been a bit of a misunderstanding (mostly on my part) and I'm really sorry if I have offended you in any way.
:--[[User:Jamietwells|Jamietwells]] ([[User talk:Jamietwells|talk]]) 14:40, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

::Ok. Apology accepted. Let's put the misunderstandings behind us.

::But I don't really know what more I can say to explain the calculation, other than what is already in that article I linked you to. The first part of it goes through the calculation step by step, explaining each one It's just in math notation. The only computerese in it is the use of "^" to indicate exponentiation, so for example x^2 means x<sup>2</sup>, and the use of SQR to indicate square-root. so SQR(expression) means the square-root of the expression. I used periods to indicate multiplication. There are some spaces that can be ignored. Other than that, it's all plain and simple, I think. Let me know if there's any specific thing you don't understand.

::Of course, I was interested in the specific problem of calculating the dimensions of a "focus balanced" dish. The later parts of the calculation have to do with force moments and the like. But the earlier parts have more general application, calculating the area of the dish.

::When I did this, I was also a bit uncertain about its accuracy, so I sent out a public appeal for anyone to confirm or deny it. Robert Israel, of the mathematics department of the University of British Columbia, volunteered to help, and re-did the calculation by some other method (which, frankly, I don't fully understand), and came up with answers that were exactly the same as mine, to ten significant digits. So then I posted it on the web, and several people actually used my result to design dishes, which turned out to balance exactly as I had calculated. So I am now highly confident that my calculation is correct.

::Do, please, try to puzzle your way through the explanation in the article I pointed you to.

::[[User:DOwenWilliams|DOwenWilliams]] ([[User talk:DOwenWilliams|talk]]) 15:52, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

:::Thanks. I've asked a [http://math.stackexchange.com/q/1341251/224561 question on stack exchange] if you're interested. My puzzle is over. The formula for the surface area of a parabolic dish is given by

:::<math>A=\frac{\pi d}{6h^2}(4h^2+d^2)^{\frac{3}{2}}</math>

:::--[[User:Jamietwells|Jamietwells]] ([[User talk:Jamietwells|talk]]) 20:38, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

::::Let me see if I've got this straight. d is the diameter of the opening of the dish and h is its height, from the vertex to the plane of the opening. Correct? So if the dish is a flat sheet, h=0 and the area is infinite. Hmmm.... [[User:DOwenWilliams|DOwenWilliams]] ([[User talk:DOwenWilliams|talk]]) 21:44, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

:::::I was really using d as the radius, but yes. I'll have a think about it tomorrow. It's time for bed here really. --[[User:Jamietwells|Jamietwells]] ([[User talk:Jamietwells|talk]]) 22:13, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

I hope you were able to sleep well.

Of course, if any formula is correct, it must predict the area to be zero if d (the radius) is zero, regardless of the value of h, and to be pi.d<sup>2</sup> if h=0.

You, and the others on the site you used, seem to have a fervent conviction that a correct formula exists. But physics is full of examples where no analytic solution for an integral can be calculated. The problem can be solved numerically to any desired level of accuracy, but not with absolute precision.

Fun stuff.

[[User:DOwenWilliams|DOwenWilliams]] ([[User talk:DOwenWilliams|talk]]) 02:35, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

:This problem is the three-dimensional equivalent of calculating the length of a parabolic arc. A solution to this is shown at [[Parabola#Length of an arc of a parabola]]. It is not a simple algebraic expression. It involves a natural logarithm. I believe there is an alternative way of writing it, using a hyperbolic sine. If an analytical solution to your problem exists, I am sure it must involve one or more transcendental functions. Trying to find it in the domain of simple algebra is, I suspect, a waste of time and effort. [[User:DOwenWilliams|DOwenWilliams]] ([[User talk:DOwenWilliams|talk]]) 02:28, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

== Recent page move ==

{{ping|RealKnockout}} I reverted your title change [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Parabolic_reflector&type=revision&diff=809594014&oldid=809245133  Parabolic reflector → Parabolic Reflector] because article titles that are common nouns are written in [[sentence case]], meaning only the first letter is capitalized. See [[MOS:TITLECASE]]. All the best. --[[User:Chetvorno|<span style="color:blue;">Chetvorno</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Chetvorno|<i style="color:purple; font-size:smaller;">TALK</i>]]</sup> 07:53, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Pages transcluded onto the current version of this page (help):

Parabolic reflector (edit)
Template:Cite journal (view source) (protected)
Template:Ping (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Portal (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Reply to (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:WikiProject Technology (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:WikiProject banner shell (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Arguments (view source) (protected)
Module:Banner shell (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Banner shell/config (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Banner shell/styles.css (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Check for unknown parameters (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1 (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/COinS (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/Date validation (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/Utilities (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/Whitelist (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css (view source) (protected)
Module:Disambiguation/templates (view source) (protected)
Module:Message box (view source) (protected)
Module:Message box/tmbox.css (view source) (protected)
Module:Pagetype (view source) (protected)
Module:Pagetype/config (view source) (protected)
Module:Pagetype/disambiguation (view source) (protected)
Module:Pagetype/rfd (view source) (protected)
Module:Pagetype/setindex (view source) (protected)
Module:Pagetype/softredirect (view source) (protected)
Module:Portal (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Portal/images/t (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Portal/styles.css (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Reply to (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Template parameter value (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:WikiProject banner (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:WikiProject banner/config (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:WikiProject banner/styles.css (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Wikitext Parsing (view source) (protected)
Module:Yesno (view source) (protected)

Return to Talk:Parabolic reflector.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Parabolic_reflector"