Jump to content

Talk:Jerusalem: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 143: Line 143:
:In respect to your concerns, @[[User:Makeandtoss|Makeandtoss]] I agree it does not have to be in the lede and I will put it in another portion of the article. I hope this is a solution that pleases everyone. [[User:Gjb0zWxOb|Gjb0zWxOb]] ([[User talk:Gjb0zWxOb|talk]]) 14:31, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
:In respect to your concerns, @[[User:Makeandtoss|Makeandtoss]] I agree it does not have to be in the lede and I will put it in another portion of the article. I hope this is a solution that pleases everyone. [[User:Gjb0zWxOb|Gjb0zWxOb]] ([[User talk:Gjb0zWxOb|talk]]) 14:31, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
::The sources don’t support the claim, they literally just state what the law is and nothing about what is in practice. [[User:Makeandtoss|Makeandtoss]] ([[User talk:Makeandtoss|talk]]) 14:40, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
::The sources don’t support the claim, they literally just state what the law is and nothing about what is in practice. [[User:Makeandtoss|Makeandtoss]] ([[User talk:Makeandtoss|talk]]) 14:40, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
:::[https://jerusaleminstitute.org.il/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/PUB_freedom-of-religion-in-gerusalem_eng.pdf], [https://honestreporting.com/religious-freedom-in-israel/]
:::We can add that some Christian organizations have felt worried about harassments and that Jews are not allowed to pray in the temple mount [https://www.timesofisrael.com/jerusalem-churches-appeal-to-government-to-safeguard-easter-worship-after-attacks/] [https://www.jpost.com/opinion/article-757336][https://www.ajc.org/news/what-to-know-about-jerusalems-temple-mount-and-the-status-quo-agreement] But in general it seems there is freedom of religion in Jerusalem. [[User:Homerethegreat|Homerethegreat]] ([[User talk:Homerethegreat|talk]]) 14:51, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:51, 2 January 2024

Former featured articleJerusalem is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on May 23, 2007.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 2, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
April 21, 2007Featured article candidateNot promoted
April 28, 2007Featured article candidatePromoted
August 7, 2008Featured article reviewDemoted
Current status: Former featured article


Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 14 October 2023

"Please change Western Asia to West Asia at the beginning of the article" Onion1981 (talk) 12:12, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This change has minimal efect, but it is the title of the associated article.  Done. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 23:05, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jerusalem before the 8th century BCE

The lead of this article claims that significant construction activity in Jerusalem began in the 9th century BCE (Iron Age II), and by the 8th century BCE, the city had developed into the religious and administrative centre of the Kingdom of Judah. In support of these claims, the article cites Moore & Kelle (2011), who wrote that the archaeological studies up to their time seemed to support those conclusions. However, a more recent source, Sergi (2023), states that the most recent archaeological evidence indicates that monumental construction activity in Jerusalem had already begun in the 10th century BCE, and the city had developed into an administrative centre by the Iron Age IIA period (see pp. 187–201). I think the article should take this newer information into account. Potatín5 (talk) 13:46, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


  • What I think should be changed (format using {{textdiff}}):

The line "Jerusalem was named as Urusalim on ancient Egyptian tablets, probably meaning "City of Shalem" after a Canaanite deity." should be removed or edited.

  • Why it should be changed:

Firstly it needs citations, and secondly this translation as being named after a Canaanite deity is already considered contentious among scholars. Shalem, whether as a town or a deity, is derived from the same root Š-L-M as the word "shalom" in Hebrew, meaning 'peace'. The much more commonly accepted translation is thus "City of Peace".


163.182.115.238 (talk) 19:09, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There are citations in the body of the article. There is further explanation at [1] with 41 citations. O3000, Ret. (talk) 19:45, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References

 Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{Edit extended-protected}} template.  Spintendo  04:15, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

According to Oslo Accords, parts of few Jerusalem's neighbourhoods such as Sur Baher, Umm Tuba, Beit Hanina, 'Arab al-Jahalin, and a small part of Kafr 'Aqab is under PA. Pls check and update it in article. since its extended protected Ya Haraami (talk) 08:02, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What is holy to whom

Jerusalem as a whole has only been holy for Jews. The other two faiths have holy sites in the city. The main text should be amended accordingly. Dori1951 (talk) 00:01, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not true so not done. There is a vast literature on this. Zerotalk 03:45, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It is holy also to other religions, prominently to Islam and Christianity. Homerethegreat (talk) 15:00, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Freedom of Religion

@Makeandtoss and @Gjb0zWxOb I saw you dealt with Freedom of Religion in the city. I think we can discuss the issue here. From what I know there is freedom of religion in Jerusalem, Christians and Muslims can go to their holysites, albiet the Jews are partially restricted from going to the temple mount. So I do think we can alter from: Additionally, under the Basic Laws, freedom of religion is protected in Israel and Jerusalem, which includes the right of various religious groups to have access and ability to worship at their holy sites receiving protection by law

to:

Additionally, under the Basic Laws, freedom of religion is protected in Israel and Jerusalem, which includes the right of various religious groups to have access and ability to worship at their holy sites receiving protection by law, although Jews are partially restricted from accessing the Temple Mount Homerethegreat (talk) 13:26, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No we are not quoting Israel's basic laws in a Wikipedia article and we are not taking "From what I know" as an argument. Please find supporting RS, and refrain from adding information to the lede that does not summarize the body. Makeandtoss (talk) 13:30, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think this is a good suggestion. I found some RSs that support the additional claim too.[2][3]
In respect to your concerns, @Makeandtoss I agree it does not have to be in the lede and I will put it in another portion of the article. I hope this is a solution that pleases everyone. Gjb0zWxOb (talk) 14:31, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The sources don’t support the claim, they literally just state what the law is and nothing about what is in practice. Makeandtoss (talk) 14:40, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[4], [5]
We can add that some Christian organizations have felt worried about harassments and that Jews are not allowed to pray in the temple mount [6] [7][8] But in general it seems there is freedom of religion in Jerusalem. Homerethegreat (talk) 14:51, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]