Talk:Owen Jones: Difference between revisions
→BLP violation: Comment |
|||
Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
:::You should not even be contributing about this topic, you don't have 500 edits. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 13:32, 5 March 2024 (UTC) |
:::You should not even be contributing about this topic, you don't have 500 edits. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 13:32, 5 March 2024 (UTC) |
||
:::: The community has determined that the Daily Express is not a suitable source. The reliability of Spiked is being discussed as we speak (see [[Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Spiked_(magazine)|the RSN]]) but early indications are that it is also unsuitable. We cannot make editorial claims about Owen based on his own YouTube video. Btw this discussion relates to the Arab-Israeli conflict. There are restrictions on who can edit within that topic. [[User:Burrobert|Burrobert]] ([[User talk:Burrobert|talk]]) 13:35, 5 March 2024 (UTC) |
:::: The community has determined that the Daily Express is not a suitable source. The reliability of Spiked is being discussed as we speak (see [[Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Spiked_(magazine)|the RSN]]) but early indications are that it is also unsuitable. We cannot make editorial claims about Owen based on his own YouTube video. Btw this discussion relates to the Arab-Israeli conflict. There are restrictions on who can edit within that topic. [[User:Burrobert|Burrobert]] ([[User talk:Burrobert|talk]]) 13:35, 5 March 2024 (UTC) |
||
== Reports of Owen Jones' downplaying and/or denial of Hamas' Oct 7th atrocities against Israelis == |
|||
Several sources have reported on controversy around Owen Jones' reaction to Hamas' Oct 7th 2023 massacre of Israelis, where he reportedly posted a YouTube video that cast doubt on claims of Hamas' infanticides and sexual violence against Israeli women. Such sources include an article by [https://www.jewishnews.co.uk/opinion-for-owen-jones-to-complain-he-didnt-see-children-being-killed-is-chilling/ Jewish News] (a UK-based newspaper which focuses on topics within the Jewish community), [https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/1839988/owen-jones-hamas-israel-claims The Express] (a tabloid, however it adds consensus here) and pro-Israel NGOs such as [https://camera-uk.org/2024/01/23/owen-jones-again-gives-hamas-a-moral-pass/ CAMERA UK] and [https://honestreporting.com/the-dangerous-lies-of-guardian-columnist-owen-jones-about-israel-hamas-war/ HonestReporting]. It is clear from these that controversy has occurred. |
|||
Additionally, controversy around Jones' wider discussion of the 2023- Israel-Hamas War can be found via sources such as [https://news.sky.com/video/owen-jones-and-margaret-hodge-have-emotional-debate-over-israel-hamas-war-12982034 Sky News] on Oct 10th, where British Labour MP Dame Margaret Hodge accused Jones of "ignoring what's happened over the last few days" (regarding Hamas' Oct 7th massacre). |
|||
Given this, and especially in light of the news of the United Nations confirming the validity of reports of Hamas sexual violence against Israeli women (see this [https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-68474899 BBC News] article), it may be appropriate to include the controversy of Owen Jones' claims around the Oct 7th massacre and surrounding topics, in the article. |
|||
Looking to build consensus. [[User:Neutral Editor 645|Neutral Editor 645]] ([[User talk:Neutral Editor 645|talk]]) 13:47, 5 March 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:47, 5 March 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Owen Jones article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 31 days |
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Minor error
"The book received a negative review from British trade unionist Len McCluskey. and was praised by Melissa Benn..."
There's a period after "Len McCluskey" and then the sentence continues. Dornwald (talk) 09:34, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Dornwald:, fixed, thanks! Schazjmd (talk) 14:22, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
BLP violation
- If there are independent reliable sources that discuss this, that is certainly valid content. 331dot (talk) 11:40, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
BLP violation removedPlease see the following articles by the Express, this online article and the original video of Owen Jones reacting to the Hamas massacre footage (from his own official YouTube channel).BLP violation removed- There was no need to remove my post from this talk page, when clarification could have been sought, given that it is evidence-backed and a valid point of discussion. There is no BLP violation at hand, except for the arbitrary application of rules here.
- Now that sources have been provided, this discussion should continue unhindered. Neutral Editor 645 (talk) 13:15, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- It wasn't arbitrary, you did not provide sources with your original post(a fact I missed) and it was correctly removed. His own YouTube videos are useless here as the issue is what others say about his comments. The second source you provide is just someone writing about their thoughts and views, it isn't a piece of journalism. 331dot (talk) 13:20, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- You conveniently leave out the first source, which is an established newspaper. Your ignoring of this does seem rather arbitrary. I will be re-posting the original discussion, with the Express newspaper article linked as a source. Neutral Editor 645 (talk) 13:22, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- If you continue to post material that violates BLP policy, it will be removed and you may be reported for administrative action. AusLondonder (talk) 13:25, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- If you refer to the BLP policy of sources required, then rest assured, the sources will be provided. If you have any ongoing issue with this important discussion taking place on the talk page, even when sufficiently referenced, then we can escalate this accordingly. Neutral Editor 645 (talk) 13:27, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) The Daily Express (WP:DAILYEXPRESS) is a generally unreliable source and absolutely unacceptable for contentious claims at a BLP. AusLondonder (talk) 13:30, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- If you continue to post material that violates BLP policy, it will be removed and you may be reported for administrative action. AusLondonder (talk) 13:25, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- You conveniently leave out the first source, which is an established newspaper. Your ignoring of this does seem rather arbitrary. I will be re-posting the original discussion, with the Express newspaper article linked as a source. Neutral Editor 645 (talk) 13:22, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- The Daily Express is a generally unreliable source (WP:DAILYEXPRESS). — LittleDwangs (talk) 13:27, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- It wasn't arbitrary, you did not provide sources with your original post(a fact I missed) and it was correctly removed. His own YouTube videos are useless here as the issue is what others say about his comments. The second source you provide is just someone writing about their thoughts and views, it isn't a piece of journalism. 331dot (talk) 13:20, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- Just a reminder that BLP applies to talk pages. Jones has published statements pushing back on your characterisation so you should provide sources discussing this rather than make unsupported allegations. You may also wish to familiarise yourself with previous discussions on the topic here and here. Vladimir.copic (talk) 12:09, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- Please see the provided sources. Neutral Editor 645 (talk) 13:15, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- You should not even be contributing about this topic, you don't have 500 edits. 331dot (talk) 13:32, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- The community has determined that the Daily Express is not a suitable source. The reliability of Spiked is being discussed as we speak (see the RSN) but early indications are that it is also unsuitable. We cannot make editorial claims about Owen based on his own YouTube video. Btw this discussion relates to the Arab-Israeli conflict. There are restrictions on who can edit within that topic. Burrobert (talk) 13:35, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- You should not even be contributing about this topic, you don't have 500 edits. 331dot (talk) 13:32, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- Please see the provided sources. Neutral Editor 645 (talk) 13:15, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Reports of Owen Jones' downplaying and/or denial of Hamas' Oct 7th atrocities against Israelis
Several sources have reported on controversy around Owen Jones' reaction to Hamas' Oct 7th 2023 massacre of Israelis, where he reportedly posted a YouTube video that cast doubt on claims of Hamas' infanticides and sexual violence against Israeli women. Such sources include an article by Jewish News (a UK-based newspaper which focuses on topics within the Jewish community), The Express (a tabloid, however it adds consensus here) and pro-Israel NGOs such as CAMERA UK and HonestReporting. It is clear from these that controversy has occurred.
Additionally, controversy around Jones' wider discussion of the 2023- Israel-Hamas War can be found via sources such as Sky News on Oct 10th, where British Labour MP Dame Margaret Hodge accused Jones of "ignoring what's happened over the last few days" (regarding Hamas' Oct 7th massacre).
Given this, and especially in light of the news of the United Nations confirming the validity of reports of Hamas sexual violence against Israeli women (see this BBC News article), it may be appropriate to include the controversy of Owen Jones' claims around the Oct 7th massacre and surrounding topics, in the article.
Looking to build consensus. Neutral Editor 645 (talk) 13:47, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia articles that use British English
- Biography articles of living people
- Start-Class biography articles
- Start-Class biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Arts and entertainment work group articles
- Start-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- Start-Class socialism articles
- Low-importance socialism articles
- WikiProject Socialism articles
- Start-Class University of Oxford articles
- Low-importance University of Oxford articles
- Start-Class University of Oxford (colleges) articles
- WikiProject University of Oxford articles
- Start-Class Politics of the United Kingdom articles
- Low-importance Politics of the United Kingdom articles
- Start-Class LGBT articles
- WikiProject LGBT studies articles
- Start-Class Journalism articles
- Mid-importance Journalism articles
- WikiProject Journalism articles
- Start-Class Sheffield articles
- Low-importance Sheffield articles
- Start-Class Yorkshire articles
- Low-importance Yorkshire articles
- WikiProject Yorkshire articles