User talk:Junosoon: Difference between revisions

Hi Junosoon! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Junosoon. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by — Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:44, 8 August 2016 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Please stop your disruptive CSD tagging, what are you tryin' to do? — RainFall 08:04, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop speedy deleting notable actor articles Atlantic306 (talk) 08:20, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please use a {{cite book}} and add necessary fields Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 07:16, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please add new talk to the bottom of the talk page. I noticed that you added talk to the top of Atlantic306 See help:talk pages Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 07:19, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lois Rodden, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mensa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of wikis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Notable (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I realize that you are new to Wikipedia and encourage you to look at some of the links I posted above. You should never nest an infobox inside of another infobox. Additionally, that page is about an individual, not a website. If you wish to create a page about the website you may do so, but do not place that infobox on a page about an individual. --Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 04:46, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Zackmann08: Hi,Zackmann08,thank you for your comments,I am a bit confused on Infobox person module, does it not state in module adaptation, that at times one infobox can be adapted in another infobox,kindly guide.thanks Junosoon (talk) 05:00, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Astrodatabank. Thanks! Joseph2302 18:41, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Astrodatabank, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Joseph2302 18:54, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bollywood and superstitions and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 13:45, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Edwin Charles Steinbrecher, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spiritual (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Junosoon, I'm glad to see you reviewing at DYK.

I wanted to let you know that only one review icon should be used per full review, not an icon for each category. (The person whose style you were emulating, Coin945, has also been informed that multiple icons is not appropriate.) We have a bot that checks all reviews and assumes that the most recent icon in any review is the one that reflects its current status, which would not have been accurate based on your original review.

I'd like to suggest that you consider a written-out format going forward, mentioning in a sentence what you've checked and any issues, and per the DYK reviewing guide, start your review with the icon that sums up the status of the nomination, whether a tick if it meets the DYK criteria or a different icon if there are issues that need to be addressed. Thanks! BlueMoonset (talk) 17:40, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiPancake was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Surendra Kumar Apharya and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiPancake ^{✉ 📖} 14:15, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, could you please provide the reason? ==AdityaChanana (talk) 06:16, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, yes the two articles differ slightly as the one focusses only on Narendra Modi demonetisation policy, other article focusses on results of demonetisation.Thanks Junosoon (talk) 06:19, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Junosoon, Indian 500 and 1000 rupee note demonetisation is an article about the demonetization process, and reactions all together. The article created by you "Narendra Modi’s demonetisation policy" has no relevant reason to exist as the demonetization process is not a policy at the first point, the demonetization process is a decision by the Government of India and Reserve Bank of India all together (not Narendra Modi's personal policy or decision), to eliminate unaccounted cash (the reason understood), it was just announced by Narendra Modi as the Prime minister of India over the unscheduled TV broadcast. So the article "Narendra Modi’s demonetisation policy" must be deleted.

@AdityaChanana, your participation will be great. Regards. Hydloc009 (talk) 05:11, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Hydloc009. I would prefer to continue the discussion on the talk page. --AdityaChanana (talk) 05:39, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Narendra Modi’s demonetisation policy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from {{{value1}}}. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The Masked Man of Mega Might (talk) 09:26, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Junosoon, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Narendra Modi’s demonetisation policy has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. The Masked Man of Mega Might (talk) 09:27, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Narendra Modi’s demonetisation policy.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop reverting the merge decision decided on the talk page. AdityaChanana (talk) 10:06, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Narendra Modi’s demonetisation policy is the source page where the merge proposal was discussed and closed .Please do not revert the merge revisions of the article,simply because it does not suit to your interests.See WP:CONSENSUS.Please restrain from these unhelpful edits.Aru@baska^{❯❯❯ Vanguard} 11:10, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Junosoon. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article National Milk Day (India) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Milk Day (India) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mr. Vernon (talk) 17:28, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to 2016 winter session of Indian Parliament and debate on note ban has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. This is your final warning. Further copyright violations will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:59, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I linked some more references on the Talk page of Snowfall in Saudi Arabia, feel free to use them to flesh the piece out. I also suggested a re-title that fits Wiki conventions better, I'd love to hear your feedback there. JamesG5 (talk) 08:12, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like an admin didn't see what you were doing with the move & broke the redirects, I messaged them to fix it. JamesG5 (talk) 08:37, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed, and I repaired the references section. Might want to flesh it out with the info from the other sources I put on the talk page. JamesG5 (talk) 08:53, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, good wishes.Junosoon (talk) 08:55, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2016 Indian Chief Ministers Committee for Digital Payment Systems is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2016 Indian Chief Ministers Committee for Digital Payment Systems until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vanamonde (talk) 04:31, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Template:Z33 Kautilya3 (talk) 15:03, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Junosoon, this comment indicates that you did not understand what the alert was about. All editors are expected to have a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and apply them in their editing. This is especially important in contentious areas. The area you are currently disputing is contentious, and so far I don't see any evidence that you are making an effort to follow policies. You can change that by reading the policies. Please start with the "Five pillars" article in your welcome message. If you continue arguing without any attention to those policies, it will be considered disruptive. Cheers, Kautilya3 (talk) 12:12, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Template talk:Did you know nominations/Astrodatabank requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:51, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is for your kind information that the page Aakrosh Diwas which you created and heavily edited has been merged to Indian 500 and 1000 rupee note demonetisation per a merge discussion.Aru@baska^{❯❯❯ Vanguard} 15:44, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2016 Cash Crunch India has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Already covered at Indian 500 and 1000 rupee note demonetisation.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 18:27, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Junosoon, I'm not sure exactly what you are doing on Indian 500 and 1000 rupee note demonetisation, but please stop, at once, and discuss the changes on the talk page first. You are deleting massive amounts of sourced content, creating decidedly unnecessary spinoff pages, and then tagging them for deletion: regardless of your intent, it is getting highly disruptive. You have already been warned about WP:ARBIPA: if you persist in your removals, or if you start edit-warring, you are facing a lengthy block. Vanamonde (talk) 14:24, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that some edits performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. They are as follows:

• On the Corruption in India page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
• On the Reserve Bank of India: Working and Functions page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check these pages and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you don't take this the wrong way, but ... do you have any other hobbies? Movies? Music? The rest of the community clearly isn't loving your contributions to the one area you are currently editing in, and opening multiple ANI threads (not to mention frivolous AFDs) is not making the situation better. Try editing constructively in another area that is perhaps less likely to cause controversy. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 00:35, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Income Tax Department (India) raids 2016-2017 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Already covered at Indian 500 and 1000 rupee note demonetisation and The Taxation Laws (Second Amendment) Act, 2016.Wikipedia is not a chronological repository of all income tax raids performed in a particular time and the money thus recovered.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Light^{❯❯❯ Saber} 07:08, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Income Tax Department (India) raids 2016-2017 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Income Tax Department (India) raids 2016-2017 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Light^{❯❯❯ Saber} 08:26, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final warning to cease your disruptive editing, be it copyright violations or endless creations of content forks etc as you've been warned before. Now you've started moving articles during the AfD process. Any further disruption will either result in a block or a topic ban from the area. —SpacemanSpiff 04:04, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Per a clear consensus at a RFC which you started, the article Indian 500 and 1000 rupee note demonetisation was moved to 2016 Indian banknote demonetisation.Do not attempt to revert the move or move the article to a new article.Light^{❯❯❯ Saber} 15:42, 25 December 2016 (UTC) Light^{❯❯❯ Saber} 15:42, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A RFC you started at Template Talk:Narendra Modi had been closed by me as procedural due to the very inappropriateness of the question and a complete non-contentious-ness of the asked question.Light^{❯❯❯ Saber} 13:25, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Persons With Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ChunnuBhai (talk) 06:15, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on The Indian Coinage Act, 1906 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ChunnuBhai (talk) 06:16, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Ajmer–Sealdah Express 2016 accident requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ChunnuBhai (talk) 09:09, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Saudi Arabian snowstorm 2016 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ChunnuBhai (talk) 09:19, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Specified Bank Notes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Concern: No citations/unsourced.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zweeb101 (talk) 16:31, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The following sanction now applies to you:

topic banned from content relating to the economy of India, including but not limited to taxation, currency and associated policy, process or practice

You have been sanctioned repeating the same behavior despite multiple warnings

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. —SpacemanSpiff 23:58, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]