User talk:Helicoid: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:: Firstly, stop making erratic personal attacks either, and changing other people's comments. Unfortunately, you infused such changes with your own comments, so the revert cancalled it out. As for retracting my stance, how childish. You want to continue to commit what can be considered vandalism, simply because you can't stand my opinion? How ironic, this reminds me of the Inquisition. Part of my education? Take me to task? I'm about to put you up for RFC. -- [[User:Natalinasmpf|Natalinasmpf]] 00:35, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC) |
:: Firstly, stop making erratic personal attacks either, and changing other people's comments. Unfortunately, you infused such changes with your own comments, so the revert cancalled it out. As for retracting my stance, how childish. You want to continue to commit what can be considered vandalism, simply because you can't stand my opinion? How ironic, this reminds me of the Inquisition. Part of my education? Take me to task? I'm about to put you up for RFC. -- [[User:Natalinasmpf|Natalinasmpf]] 00:35, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC) |
||
:::No, the Inquisition is you, Mr. fake anarchist and fake-adolescent. You have vandalized everything I did, and more, vandalized gratuitously the reputation of the Correas and many other scientists in the process. I'm putting Ms. Knott on notice that I will now send a complete copy of these transcripts to the Correas and others. A retraction of these fake claims by irresponsible Wikipedians and a restoration of my entry to a suitable middle term (not this abortion) is in order. |
|||
== 2nd warning == |
== 2nd warning == |
||
Revision as of 01:59, 25 June 2005
Warning
- Don't change other people's posts on talk pages. [1]
- Watch your language.
Pjacobi 20:46, 2005 Jun 24 (UTC)
Oh, stop editing other people's comments. You've done the same to me as well. And for personal attacks, I never did call you anything, so mind yours too. I bet my nationality is very relevant in this case. *rolleyes* -- Natalinasmpf 21:05, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Stop deleting my responses. Retract all the lies you have stated. Be civil, and I will be civil. Lie and make more false statements and I will continue to take you to task. It is part of your education. You will not forget it.Helicoid
- Firstly, stop making erratic personal attacks either, and changing other people's comments. Unfortunately, you infused such changes with your own comments, so the revert cancalled it out. As for retracting my stance, how childish. You want to continue to commit what can be considered vandalism, simply because you can't stand my opinion? How ironic, this reminds me of the Inquisition. Part of my education? Take me to task? I'm about to put you up for RFC. -- Natalinasmpf 00:35, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- No, the Inquisition is you, Mr. fake anarchist and fake-adolescent. You have vandalized everything I did, and more, vandalized gratuitously the reputation of the Correas and many other scientists in the process. I'm putting Ms. Knott on notice that I will now send a complete copy of these transcripts to the Correas and others. A retraction of these fake claims by irresponsible Wikipedians and a restoration of my entry to a suitable middle term (not this abortion) is in order.
2nd warning
You did it again:
This is a blockable offense. --Pjacobi 23:45, 2005 Jun 24 (UTC)
He just did it a third time. I reverted. -- Natalinasmpf 00:35, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Did what again? Correct a mispelling in your text or interact with your statements?
As it would be against policy to block him myself, I've reported at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Aetherometry. --Pjacobi 00:38, 2005 Jun 25 (UTC)
- Thank you for finally seeing the problem, but signing your post at the very top of the talk page with the usual ~~~~ would be even more clear. --Pjacobi 00:44, 2005 Jun 25 (UTC)
- Even though I corrected it myself and you saw that, you're willing to report me. Nice. Thank you. Will I be arrested? That's the point of the exercise in coercion isn't it? Very democratic.Helicoid.
Personal attacks
Personal attacks and breaking the three revert rule are blockable offenses. Your edits to Aetherometry amount to personal attacks. Please remove them. Guettarda 01:21, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- What edits? Helicoid
- "Detractors of aetherometry who have not read the material state..." - you are attacking your fellow editors. Please remove these attacks. Guettarda 01:34, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- That's not a personal attack as far as I can see. Having said that, it's silly to have it in the article as no one can say who has read what Theresa Knott (ask the rotten) 01:38, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- I guess that you guys have now blocked me from history and editing the entry. Good show all around. Power - that's all that counts.
- The page isn't locked, and if you can edit this page you aren't blocked. Guettarda 01:48, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- As far as I can tell you aren't blocked at all and are perfectly free to edit. Theresa Knott (ask the rotten) 01:49, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Good, Ms. Knott. And what's with the headings? not a block? by the way, have you noticed how the detractors of my free contribution have NOT read the material? Is it Wikipedia policy to assert dogmas about science and give the deciding power to those who vandalized my contribution to this pitiable extent? Helicoid.
- You are not blocked from editing the headings. If you explain the problems you are having I can perhaps sort it out for you. As for people editing the page, I haven't seen any vadalism. People are trying to improve the article as far as I can see. It's important that it is fair and neutral and reports both sides of the argument. Theresa Knott (ask the rotten) 01:58, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)