Talk:Govind Kumar Singh: Difference between revisions

Biography: Arts and Entertainment Start‑class

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles Start This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).

India Start‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles Start This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

--Vermapriya1986 (talk) 11:15, 6 March 2011 (UTC)--Vermapriya1986 (talk) 11:09, 6 March 2011 (UTC)It's not about promoting people its all about making Wikipedia more relevant with this kind of Article .Govind Kumar Singh is very popular and Talented Youth Icon in India . He is appreciated nationally and Internationally , recently he won India's Leading Lifestyle TV reality show Let's Design .This article has all references . If any further formating is required ,feel free to suggest . I think this page should not be deleted because its very relevant page in Wikipedia . Please don't remove this page , i will surely do necessary formating and changes . http://in.news.yahoo.com/success-encourage-youth-bihar-designer-govind-singh-20110225-024558-216.html http://www.cottonusa.org/whatsnew.cfm?Itemnumber=3551 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vermapriya1986 (talk • contribs) 10:24, 6 March 2011 (UTC) http://www.dnaindia.com/lifestyle/report_how-green-is-your-wardrobe_1499977 http://www.southasianews.com/NewsPrint.asp?nid=630560 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vermapriya1986 (talk • contribs) 10:48, 6 March 2011 (UTC) http://www.deccanherald.com/content/132464/interpretation-cotton.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vermapriya1986 (talk • contribs) 11:00, 6 March 2011 (UTC) --Vermapriya1986 (talk) 11:09, 6 March 2011 (UTC) --Vermapriya1986 (talk) 11:15, 6 March 2011 (UTC)http://daily.bhaskar.com/article/LIF-go-green-with-your-wardrobe-1795816.html --Vermapriya1986 (talk) 11:15, 6 March 2011 (UTC)http://www.job.indiablooms.com/FashionnewsDetailsPage/fashionnewsDetails170211a.php[reply]

This is very important article and there is no reason to keep this page under conflict of interest , this article has been written under natural point of view and Wikipedia's direction . I would like to request you please remove "conflict of interest" tag from this article . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vermapriya1986 (talk • contribs) 17:01, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A contributor keeps trying to asset a format to this article which in my opinion is ridiculous and, in some areas, contrary to Wikipedia policy. Having a section for each award, where each section then comprises 2 or 3 sentences looks wrong and is unnecessary. Mentioning the judges is trivia in the extreme and Singh does not gain notability because of his tangential connection to them. There is a desperate need for citations and there is a need for images that are definitely not copyrighted.

And that last point is tricky because the contributor who has been supplying images has on several occasions been found to be uploading copyrighted pictures. I know that I am supposed to assume good faith but when someone claims something is their own work and it turns out to be published under copyright elsewhere, well, it becomes difficult to make any assumption of that sort. There appears at present to be one particular picture in dispute: I commented it out (ie: did not delete it) because I am 99% sure it is a copyvio but need to look into it futher. Wikipedia policies say that all copyvios must be removed immediately; my commenting out is a halfway house but based on a certain history and also on the suspicious nature of the photo itself - the quality, the need to have access to take it etc would all suggest that this is a professional work but there is no indication that the contributor is a professional. In fact, the past copyvios suggests that xe is not because no pro photographer of repute would tolerate violations of a colleague's work. Sorry, but that's how it is at the moment. - Sitush (talk) 15:47, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Per Wikipedia:LINK#Non-English-language_sites, linking to non-English sites on English wikipedia is not usually a great idea. There is currently one citation in this article that is non-English and I would be astonished if an English equivalent does not exist somewhere. Does anyone know of one, please? - Sitush (talk) 16:02, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

--Vermapriya1986 (talk) 03:21, 23 March 2011 (UTC) User Sitush has changed my article Govind Kumar Sinhg he has deleted all important informations from this page please help me out , i am not able to change my page , or put informations in this page , he is deleting every thing from this page , i thin he has personal issues with this person , he is intensionally deleting all informations , please help me out , how to short out this problem i am new users , i put my hard work to create , collect all informations for this article he is quite irresponsible , please help me to block this person .He is having personal issie with this article please block this IP address for edting , I dont have any issue with any other he thing but he has deleted all referenes from this page and if you will see he is the only person who is eding this page everytime i am sure he has personal issue with his article , he is the only person who is having problems with this ,why he has changed format of page , why he has deleted all importent references , he has also deleted inmportent informations form this page this page beome useless , the page is all ready apreciated by previous editor as u can see in my talk page there are so many rferences wich was there in this page he has deleted everything t --Vermapriya1986 (talk) 03:21, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This issue has been explained multiple times on the IRC Chat and on your talk page. He has no personal issue with this article, but when information is added that violates copyright it becomes a legal problem for Wikipedia, so the content must be removed. You need to explain why the information should be added back, instead of calling other users 'irresponsible' and saying that they have 'personal issues' with the article. You are asking all of these 'why this' and 'why that' questions that have already been answered multiple times in multiple places. You are also thinking of it as your page, which it is not. Please use this talk page constructively to explain why the information should be added back. Thank you. - SudoGhost (talk) 04:18, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you look at the edit history for the article then you will see my edit summaries. I deliberately did the changes in small chunks, summarising the reason for each one. That should explain to you why things were deleted, moved, rephrased, added or whatever. In particular, there is no need to include a multitude of citations for any one statement if those citations add nothing further - they are repetitive and pointless. I am beginning to become a little concerned at your personal attacks and would urge you to read (and accept) the many comments that other, uninvolved people have made on IRC< your talk page, their talk pages etc regarding this issue. Taking the scatter-gun approach that you have done to vent your annoyance could actually be construed as a breach of WP:CANVASS. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 09:57, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fashion Bangalore is used as a reference for several statements in this article. Is it a reliable source? I ask because on the About page for that website it says that it is an aggregator - who knows where the content has come from, and whether it is reliable or not? There appear to be no by-lines and the thing is being operated using blog software (WordPress). I've got some doubts about this. Thoughts? - Sitush (talk) 22:04, 23 March 2011 (UTC) --Vermapriya1986 (talk) 03:25, 24 March 2011 (UTC)yes offcource it realible source , its India's one of the best Fashion News realted website , Dear Sitush you are the only who has this much of confusion . Its realibel source so dont worry . thaks .[reply]