Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tweebuffelsmeteenskootmorsdoodgeskietfontein (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Relisting debate |
Keep |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Northamerica1000|NorthAmerica]]<sup>[[User_talk:Northamerica1000|1000]]</sup> 10:09, 1 October 2014 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]] |
:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Northamerica1000|NorthAmerica]]<sup>[[User_talk:Northamerica1000|1000]]</sup> 10:09, 1 October 2014 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]] |
||
<hr style="width:55%;" /> |
<hr style="width:55%;" /> |
||
* '''Keep''' as a place and name that has cultural relevance in South Africa. The same arguments were made in the previous AfD discussion. According to [http://stats-classic.grok.se/en/latest/Tweebuffelsmeteenskootmorsdoodgeskietfontein traffic stats] it sees about 1k views per month, so certainly not nothing. [[User:Dewet|dewet]]|[[User_talk:Dewet|✉]] 11:26, 1 October 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:26, 1 October 2014
AfDs for this article:
- Tweebuffelsmeteenskootmorsdoodgeskietfontein (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notability has not been established. None of the references do that. Up and in (talk) 21:40, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 September 23. —cyberbot I NotifyOnline 22:07, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:41, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
- Weak keep as a place that has a place in South African folklore. This is definitely not something for Wiktionary as suggested by some in the previous Afd. The place verifiably exists and there are some sources. The article needs more sources especially ones detailing its place in folklore, but that is not a reason to delete. I found several places where it was used in advertising, and elsewhere, to be a stand-in for a very rural location, i.e. "the middle of nowhere", but no academic discussion of this phenomenon. But I did find this sentence in the October 2014 Hartebeest Conservation Newsletter Like Pofadder, the farm has become a bit of a legend in Afrikaans folklore and is often used to depict typical farm culture in South Africa. --Bejnar (talk) 04:12, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 10:09, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
- Keep as a place and name that has cultural relevance in South Africa. The same arguments were made in the previous AfD discussion. According to traffic stats it sees about 1k views per month, so certainly not nothing. dewet|✉ 11:26, 1 October 2014 (UTC)