Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 March 25: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m →‎[[Template:Deprod-afd]]: Missed a linebreak.
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 40: Line 40:
* {{Tfd links|Citation/core/testing}}
* {{Tfd links|Citation/core/testing}}
This template apparently is not used anymore. [[User:Jo-Jo Eumerus|Jo-Jo Eumerus]] ([[User talk:Jo-Jo Eumerus|talk]], [[Special:CentralAuth/Jo-Jo Eumerus|contributions]]) 16:17, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
This template apparently is not used anymore. [[User:Jo-Jo Eumerus|Jo-Jo Eumerus]] ([[User talk:Jo-Jo Eumerus|talk]], [[Special:CentralAuth/Jo-Jo Eumerus|contributions]]) 16:17, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
*'''delete.''' I created it for testing many years ago. No longer needed. <span style="text-shadow:1px 1px 1px grey">[[User:COGDEN|''CO<small>GDEN</small>'']]</span> 04:11, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

==== [[Template:Archive list/display25]] ====
==== [[Template:Archive list/display25]] ====
* {{Tfd links|Archive list/display25}}
* {{Tfd links|Archive list/display25}}

Revision as of 04:11, 26 March 2017

March 25

Now that userspace is NOINDEX'ed by default, this template message is unnecessary. — Train2104 (t • c) 23:54, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template with a broken tool link. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:45, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cite doi was retired, so this template probably should as well. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:44, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A template which is potentially useful only if kept current, but has not been updated since its creation in 2012. Most of the links are red, and the 2 bluelinks both link to articles which appear to be unconnected to the topic of indoor American football. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:37, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Created in 2006 per Talk:Video_game_music/Archive_1#Some_video_game_music_samples.3F. If it was needed, it would probably have been used by now. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:04, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pointless navbox which is just a sea of redlinks, with precisely zero navigable links. Even the title link is non-navigable. Created in 2008, so doesn't look like it is going anywhere. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 19:02, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This template does not appear to be in use anywhere anymore. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:30, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This template apparently is not used anymore. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:17, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This template does not appear to be in use anymore and has no transclusions. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:15, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This template does not appear to be in use anymore and has no transclusions. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:14, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This template does not appear to be in use in system messages anymore, or anywhere at all. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:13, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like the use of this template never really took off, given that it has only a few transclusions that don't appear to be proper uses. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:46, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This template does not appear to be in use anymore. Should it be deleted or simply marked as historical? (It has a fair amount of links) Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:42, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template does not appear to be in use anymore. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:29, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 13:25, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like this template never really got into use. Pinging @MSGJ: given that it's on User talk:MSGJ/to do Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:51, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This looks like a {{Namespace and pagename-detecting templates}} that never really took off. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:49, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This template does not appear to be in use anymore. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:26, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This template does not appear to be in use anymore. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:23, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This template does not appear to be in use anymore. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:22, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This template does not appear to be in use anymore anywhere. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:12, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is this template still needed anywhere? It does not appear to be in use anymore. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:12, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This template was apparently never used, or isn't used anymore, on MediaWiki:Blockiptext. It is prolly obsolete and should be deleted or marked as historical and unprotected. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:08, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This way of salting titles is obsolete. Does it merit deletion, tagging as historical and unprotection? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:52, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This template does not appear to be used in system messages or MediaWiki:Common.js anymore. Is it still needed? It also needs to be delisted from WP:CASC if deleted. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:27, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Jo-Jo Eumerus: This requires investigation - if I go to Special:MyPage/skin.js when not logged in, I see this template flash by for a fraction of a second before the regular "Wikipedia does not have a user page with this exact name" page loads. — Train2104 (t • c) 18:30, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Found the trouble spot - need to remove the skin.js and skin.css lines from {{No article text}}. common.js sends the user immediately to the proper skin file name anyway. See sandbox. — Train2104 (t • c) 18:41, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete uncontroversial clean up of redundant subtemplates. Jimp 20:39, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is this template still in use anywhere? Because if no it should probably be deleted. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:23, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Unused and deprecated template; all uses have been replaced with {{BSsplit}}. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me
05:48, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Long overdue. Useddenim (talk) 14:15, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging all into {{Deprod}}. Having separate templates for each reason for deprodding seems excessive to me. Either merge with a parameter switch, or just use {{deprod-m}} that takes a custom explanation. I deliberately did not nominate {{deprod-reprod}}, as that is more of a policy reminder. — Train2104 (t • c) 01:47, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support Seems fair. Maybe {{deprod-m}} can be adjusted to fit the standard WP:WARNING style. TheDragonFire (talk) 02:58, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both as redundant with {{Proposed deletion notify}}. — Train2104 (t • c) 01:45, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]