User talk:Graeme Bartlett/archive 29: Difference between revisions

This is a Wikipedia user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user in whose space this page is located may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Graeme_Bartlett/archive_29.

	Older talk is in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 archives. Please add your talk at the bottom of the page:

Hello. Thanks for your verification. Can you please check that the edit I made (I removed external link) is suitable to remove the Advert flag you previously placed? Jblaloe (talk) 14:16, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Jblaloe: The problem is the tone of the article. It sounds as if it is trying to promote the subject and make it sound good. Things to change are decapitalise GlobalFoundries to make it less prominent. Reduce use of peacock adjectives. It has the tone of being a section from a CV. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:27, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Graeme Bartlett: Thanks for the feedback. I have de-capitalized the company name, I understand. I am continuing to work on the page to tone it down as you suggest. Thanks. Jblaloe (talk) 16:30, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear friend, I put the reference almost to all sentences, I spent my days on it. But still, I ask you give me some days to review the article from the scratch and correct what s wrong. Thank you. ZahraGasim (talk) 05:52, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Soloricon (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:James L Fletcher (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

The Press Release for Solar Head of State was taken from my resume and information on my web site. This is why it reads similar to what is cited in the Wikipedia text. Therefore, you are now requesting that I rewrite my own words in my own words. I am not sure how this is possible. I will add references, as requested, but the implication that I plagiarised the Solar Head of State Press Release is insulting Soloricon (talk) 03:26, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Soloricon: Here on Wikipedia we do not know who you are. So please do not be insulted if you might be considered as somebody else. However there are some things you could do or should do. Since you are closely working with the subject and probably paid, you should read WP:Paid editing and make a formal disclosure. Secondly, to prove that you want that press release to also be useable on Wikipedia, you can add the same kind of license on the website, that is a CC-BY-SA-3.0, which will prove that you are the same person that put the content there, and do want it copied. Another way is to do the actions at WP:OTRS, by sending an email from your domain stating that you hold the copyright and want to give it under the GFDL/CC-BY-SA-3.0 license. In any case to show Notability of a subject or person we need at least two independent, reliable and substantial writings on the topic. These do not include press releases, as they are not independent. I don't know if there are sources for James L Fletcher. I hope you can find suitable ones. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:41, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that you have warned me about an edit war. But are you going to warn User:NorthBySouthBaranof too? He has been equally participating in an edit war. Also, may I know why my question was removed? Knowing why will help me understand why I am getting these warnings. Regards. --Ter-roof-tel-err (talk) 05:36, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am considering warning, however MarnetteD has also reverted you and you have put this up 6 times now. So you are over the warring limit. I was distracted by looking at the talk page Wikipedia talk:Reference desk to see if anyone was talking about your question. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:40, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You wasted my time and everyone else's by not just blocking this person straightaway. They've since been indef'd as a sock by User:NinjaRobotPirate. An apology would be nice - I don't appreciate being barked at by an admin who can't be arsed to actually look at what a trolling user is doing and instead just baldly accuse me of "edit-warring" because I happen to be nice enough to take the time to revert a sockpuppet vandal. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 09:48, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ref desk trolling is a problem that needs firm treatment. It is not always easy for onlookers to recognize what is going on, but applying WP:DENY is common as it is the only way to break the habit. For example, see diff and IP's contribs (31-hour block). Johnuniq (talk) 10:04, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed you added |Reaxys= to {{Chembox}}, like here. However, at the moment this is not an existing parameter, and it reports the article at Category:Chemical articles with unknown parameter in Chembox.

I suggest that if you think Reaxys should be added to the template, you propose that at {{Chembox}} (talk). -DePiep (talk) 10:56, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I was thinking of asking for it. It seems to duplicate the Beilstein reference in cases where that exists. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:10, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can you userfy this? Valoem ^{talk contrib} 16:24, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

•  Done see User:Valoem/Farberware. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:20, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

		Special Edition New Page Patroller's Barnstar
		For completing over 250 reviews during the 2018 NPP New Year Backlog Drive please accept this Special Edition Barnstar with 250 commemorative coin. Thank you for helping out at New Page Patrol! There is still work to do to meet our long term goals, so I hope you will continue your great work. Cheers! — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 07:58, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

		Geneva Drive
		For maintaining a streak of at least 50 reviews per week during the 2018 NPP New Year Backlog drive, you are awarded the Geneva drive. Well done! Keep up the good work. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 07:58, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Science, Reason and Faith Group, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carlos Pérez (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[1] It got deleted so fat I couldn't answer but what copyright violation? I only copied content from the page linked below. It's not worded in the same way way as the material in the sources. Could you restore this page? Oranjelo100 (talk) 12:53, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[2]

It can be restored if correct credit is given to Prehistoric Egypt#Khormusan Industry. I will take a look tomorrow. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:57, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK I have restored it. 21:28, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Thanks. Oranjelo100 (talk) 21:06, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

How can I prove notability as a science writer (obviously not as academic...)? Jesswade88 (talk) 22:03, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Jesswade88: The way to prove notability as a writer will be to find reviews of her writings. Hopefully there are book reviews around. An independent biography would be great. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:10, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Graeme Bartlett: How is it now? I have added more links. Jesswade88 (talk) 18:40, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your note on the use of quotations on the page. I have gone back in and edited the section and will be sure to keep this in mind in the future.
Much appreciated. Pen vs Sword (talk) 00:23, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Great, an alternative would have been for me to just remove it, but much better for you to include the info. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:25, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Post-fire hillslope stabilization treatments, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Runoff and Seeding (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi GB!

Could you review these two pages:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ozak_Esu https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vinita_Marwaha_Madill

Many thanks :)

Jesswade88 (talk) 20:56, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!!! 😁😁😁 Jesswade88 (talk) 22:46, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tabitha_Goldstaub

Thank you.

🙃 Jesswade88 (talk) 04:56, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_tribal_painting

Hi Graeme

I have the notice that you has reviewed "Indian tribal painting". Does it mean that you don't have any changes to this machine-translated french article (https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peinture_tribale_en_Inde)?

best Andershus

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_painting

Hi Graeme

Do you have time to review this machine-translated french article (https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peinture_en_Inde)?

best Andershus

Thank you so much for your help improving the article! :) Beckettnoti (talk) 14:45, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Graeme, Thank you for your suggestions for Jeanette Scissum's page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeanette_Scissum). I have removed nearly all of the quotes but have kept the final one as I felt it was important given her work in this area. Would it please be possible to review it when you get a chance? Thank you very much Eolaíocht (talk) 07:46, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Contesting Prod, please restore page and talk. Valoem ^{talk contrib} 14:08, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also can you restore the history and talk of Dig Two Graves? Valoem ^{talk contrib} 19:18, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:22, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Iac 6483 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Andrea Galvani (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Iac 6483 (talk) 23:56, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Graeme. Thanks for reviewing my article. I appreciate the work that you're doing for wikipedia and hope that we can come to an agreement so that my article can be posted soon.

I see that my submission was declined on the grounds that the material was allegedly copied from the artist's CV. Considering that I spent hours writing the content on this page, and researching relevant sources for accuracy (in addition to providing visitors to this page with further reading material should they be interested to investigate further), this was a disappointment. I took every appropriate measure to cite my sources, and any un-cited material that appears in the article was written by me in my own words. For these reasons, it is unclear to me which part of the text you believe was copied from the artist's CV.

I am eager to resolve this issue and urgently would like to discuss any content that copied from another source. Many thanks again for your time and consideration, I look forward to your response very soon.

@Iac 6483: I have removed some more copying from the "Deconstruction of a Mountain". I am useing this https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Draft%3AAndrea+Galvani&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1&turnitin=0 to check for copying from web sites. Also Primefac has hidden earlier copying. Next "Ibid" should never appear in a reference, as people can easily insert things between the references. Nothing here is totally finished and can be modified. Are you being paid to write this? if you are please read WP:Paid editing. You can press "Resubmit" when ready. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:24, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can you combine the histories of William Bentvena and William Devino plus their talk pages and userfy this for me? Valoem ^{talk contrib} 12:19, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See http://mafia.wikia.com/wiki/William_Bentvena of which William Bentvena was an unattributed copy. So no restoring that, though you can take a copy with the right attribution. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:23, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be rewriting the entire thing before mainspacing what about William Devino did that original version influence http://mafia.wikia.com/wiki/William_Bentvena ? Valoem ^{talk contrib} 12:25, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See User:Valoem/William Devino which has a very big history. Only one revision timed 15:07, 11 January 2018 for " William Bentvena", its not important in wiki history. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:30, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not having admin privilege is annoying, but can you restore the history and talk and then smerge to the draft? Valoem ^{talk contrib} 15:25, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also can you restore the history and talk of Genco Abbandando and unprotect, I don't have any immediate intentions to restore, but sources such as The Diplomat, suggest he has some influence in popular culture giving a strong reason for invoking WP:PRESERVE. Valoem ^{talk contrib} 17:36, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry another one, can you userfy XNXX plus talk, it is a top 50 most viewed webpage, I'll clean it before restore. Valoem ^{talk contrib} 17:49, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also userfy, Angelo Sepe and Guido Penosi mostly like to be restored as redirect per WP:PRESERVE. Valoem ^{talk contrib} 18:39, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RFA.

See Draft:Dell Boomi history

Better ask user talk:Ronhjones about Genco Abbandando. As he has the last protector. The AFD was pretty definitive but long ago. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:20, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And this one XNXX should have been deleted via AFD: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XNXX but instead was invalidly deleted by G11. However there is no useful content, and no useful references, so you you may as well start it from scratch. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:32, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See User:Valoem/Angelo Sepe User:Valoem/Guido Penosi. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:46, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I've never been in a situation like this, so I don't really know the protocol, but I have concerns about a user who has been making the same changes as User:Ozarcusmapesae to articles where I reverted on the basis of them being unsourced. I don't want to assume anything but they seem to be creating the same sorts of unsourced articles and making random changes to taxonomies, as well as some other things which lead me to suspect they are the same person (and started editing again after Ozarcusmapesae stopped editing). They are similarly unresponsive on their talk page and not providing edit summaries, so I feel my attempts at talking to them directly will go unheard (for example, they undid my reversions of the unsourced changes the aforementioned user made, without adding any citations or an edit summary). Not sure what to do, any advice? I don't want to attack anyone or put anyone off from making edits, as some of their edits are constructive (I think, as someone not too knowledgeable about ichnospecies), but they also seem to be making a large amount of unsourced changes and additions, which will need to be gone through to determine their validity. Very confused about the whole thing, any help appreciated! Thanks, ElfLady64 (talk) 21:51, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@ElfLady64: Hi Fiona, are you talking about Sanajeh? Anyway I have also left a message on this user's talk page. One issue is that everything is templated notifications, and not a personal message. Sometimes email can make contact with unresponsive users, but there's no email enabled. The formal method for problems for socking users (a person using more than one userid abusively) is WP:SPI. However it is very difficult to format your request, and I think I have never done things correctly there. If you just need to get someone blocked WP:ANI is the place to debate this. One way to get them blocked is the get a team of people to revert bad changes, and if the bad user persists it can be blocked for WP:3RR violation. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:13, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that is them! Thank you, Graeme, I guess I'm not just seeing things where they aren't! I have the problem where I'm not familiar enough with the subject matter to know if the changes are blatantly wrong, or just poorly interpreted or unsourced, so I didn't really want to just go straight to WP:ANI (especially if they are young like you suspected in the paleontology talk thread). I will talk with some of the other people I noticed reverting their edits to see what they think. However, they seem to often just give up when their articles are contested, and don't necessarily go back to old articles but instead make the same types of changes on new ones, so as to avoid notice of the fact they are continuing to make disruptive edits, and also avoiding WP:3RR. Thanks for your input! ElfLady64 (talk) 22:22, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please restore full history, plus talk. Valoem ^{talk contrib} 20:16, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Done also World Harvest Television as redirect. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:54, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

The content I copied was copied from PsychonautWiki (https://psychonautwiki.org/wiki/Main_Page) pages. As you can see at the bottom of each page on their site, "Content is available under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International unless otherwise noted". So I request that you remove the speedy deletion tags you placed. Sincerely, Ethanbas ^(talk) 00:16, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 content cannot be re-licensed as Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 on Wikipedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:23, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wait, why not? Can you explain to me? Ethanbas ^(talk) 00:26, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Text of Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License section 3.b.1 - it says same or later version. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:39, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Please delete those three articles, I will rewrite them. Ethanbas ^(talk) 00:54, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK gone with criterion G7 " One author who has requested deletion or blanked the page". I think the topics are worth having though. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:02, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Could I have that userfied plus talk. Valoem ^{talk contrib} 17:13, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:01, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also these need to be restored List of World Harvest Television Affiliates and List of LeSEA Affiliates. Valoem ^{talk contrib} 17:15, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See User:Valoem/List of World Harvest Television stations, the first was moved twice (and finaly redirected). The second, a redirect to first. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:07, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also can you userfy this Poker Central and Bart Hanson. Valoem ^{talk contrib} 18:23, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See User:Valoem/Poker Central - not much for you there. Also User:Valoem/Bart Hanson with talk. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:11, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

If you have time, can you rewiew these:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sophie_Deen

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbara_Webb

?

Many thanks Jesswade88 (talk) 23:02, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can you merge history and restore Sicilian people to Sicilians this should have never been merged especially with no discussion. Valoem ^{talk contrib} 18:40, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Both of these are now redirects, and what was in the history either insignificant, or copied from elsewhere. History merge will confuse it more. There are no deleted versions, so I think it is better to leave it as is. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:32, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I intended to split Sicilians from Sicily that appears to be the precedence with people from the region. Valoem ^{talk contrib} 06:59, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm fairly new to Wikipedia, and something caught my attention. You marked Promineral SA as reviewed. I had a look at the user who created it, Special:Contributions/Ovvo, and it looks like that user has done nothing over the years but maintain a page about the company who's just bought the one that the new article is about. This may or may not be some kind of conflict of interest. What do you normally do in these cases? Thanks, Dr. Vogel (talk) 02:35, 3 March 2018 (UTC) BTW you can reply here, I'm watching this page.[reply]

@DrVogel: Thanks for your alert. I have tagged this with a COI tag. We should also ask Ovvo to make a WP:Paid editing disclosure. There is also an email enabled. Do you want to do this request? In the longer term an AFD may be appropriate for those low notability companies. I prefer to let the writer have a chance to prove notability before arranging AFD. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:45, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

He/she is already going to hate me enough for bringing this to your attention! What do you normally do? Leave a message at the user's talk page politely asking them to disclose if they have a COI? Dr. Vogel (talk) 02:55, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. It is often ignored. Don't just ask about conflict of interest, but ask about being paid, and ask them to read and then follow the instructions in Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:00, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, done. I've probably made my first wikienemy though. Dr. Vogel (talk) 03:07, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It does not sound too aggressive. See what happens. If you take having enemies, having your pages vandalised, and email harassed, then that is what admins and vandal fighters here experience. I was hoping there would be a standard text template to put on a talk page, but I didn't find it. Let me know if you experience trouble, but more likely nothing at all will happen! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:15, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, there's no need to also restore the talk pages: they only contain the {{WikiProject Disambiguation}} banner, which according to its documentation, sjouldn't be placed on talk pages that otherwise have no content. – Uanfala (talk) 21:21, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK that makes it quicker! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:23, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Good, thanks for restoring this huge pile of pages! – Uanfala (talk) 18:43, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Christopher Macosko, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Elasticity (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can I get that userfied? Valoem ^{talk contrib} 22:21, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

see User:Valoem/Johnny Fontane Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:05, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Actually can I get all the articles deleted here? I intend to eventually make List of characters in The Godfather (series). Valoem ^{talk contrib} 22:26, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can I get this plus talk userfy? Valoem ^{talk contrib} 21:39, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Done see User:Valoem/Horseshoe Bossier City Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:57, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Saw your edit at RfD, just a friendly reminder that G6 doesn't apply to redirects left behind after a pagemove unless the page was unambiguously made in error. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 17:59, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In this case the page was originally named in error. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:24, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Admin, I am requesting you cause i saw that nexy admin who deleted Prakash Neupane is not active recently so, Can you please undelete and restore the page Prakash Neupane which you deleted previously. He is notable artist and here are some of the references link provided below which he is featured in National and international. Huffpost:- https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/nepali-rap-artist-praksh-neupanes-new-bang-on-nepali_us_59d5a96be4b085c51090ada8?m=false

Khasokhas Weekly : http://www.khasokhas.com/41291

ABC Television (Nepal) : http://abcnepal.tv/news/2018/03/07/25730.html

So, please undelete his page. Thanks 27.34.104.226 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 09:00, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I only undeleted one revision before, but the AFD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prakash Neupane (2nd nomination) was what has decided the fate. Because of this I suggest that you write a draft:Prakash Neupane, incorporating your new references to show notability. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:11, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Can you approve it after i creates Draf one please let me know? 27.34.16.58 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 11:08, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I can look at it, but it will only be approved if it is suitable. You can use the WP:AFC process to get others to approve it (or not). Another thing to do is WP:Deletion review, but it will be best to have a good draft ready to go. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:01, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi i have created Draft of draft:Prakash Neupane please review and publish page if its possible to be published. 27.34.16.58 (talk)

• Hi Please Review and let me know here i’m waiting for you response. 27.34.16.58 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 19:46, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please move The Poker Player's Championship to The Poker Players Championship plus talk per common name? Valoem ^{talk contrib} 10:11, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Done How about updating the content? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:17, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I will after I finish Meade Esposito. Valoem ^{talk contrib} 14:21, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Valoem ^{talk contrib} 18:52, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm CASSIOPEIA. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Geology of Wolverhampton, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:58, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Early reader. Since you had some involvement with the Early reader redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 13:04, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dominick Alongi, Dominick DiQuarto, Ciro Perrone for direct restore, Salvatore Aparo for userfication. Also I recreated Federico Giovanelli is there anything in history or talk worth restoring? Valoem ^{talk contrib} 13:33, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

For Federico Giovanelli it is all copyright violations. I restored Ciro Perrone. For Dominick Alongi, Dominick DiQuarto they are A7 fodder, so if you want userfication, that is possible, but otherwise would not survive in article space. They are just 1 or 2 lines. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:24, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

see User:Valoem/Salvatore Aparo. Let me know if you want the first 2 userfied. Starting from scratch should be OK for you too. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:52, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! if there are categories and it is somewhat formatted i'll take it otherwise it's okay. Is there nothing in the history? I saw some usable things in the history. Valoem ^{talk contrib} 03:28, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See User:Valoem/Dominick Alongi and User:Valoem/Dominick DiQuarto. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:51, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning Graeme, We have been working on the Emtec wiki page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Emtec) for some time and it seems to have been rejected for sources that are not 3rd party sources. When reviewed, the actual sources we have provided are in fact 3rd party sources. It seems the person who rejected our profile is no longer part of this wiki approval process so we hope you can help.

After the last reject- we edited the page to ensure it was informational only, ensuring any promotional content was removed, updating links, making sure 3rd parties were cited, and removed some internal press release links.

We have been getting inundated with requests for the other Emtec noted at this wiki address- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EMTEC and our legal team has requested we get our Wiki page approved so there is some record of the two different firms on Wikipedia. This will hopefully help the situation.

Before we submit the page again, Can you please tell us what we need to edit- if anything- to get this page approved?

Appreciatively,

Deanna Evers Devers9

Devers9 (talk) 14:25, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Devers9: Please read WP:Paid editing and make your statement on your user page User:Devers9. I have started looking at some references. May are just a single named appearance on a list of many. What we need also is substantial, independent coverage. I would expect at least 2 paragraphs. Independent means that it is not written by EMTEC or those it does business with. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:06, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Your account is currently configured with an education program flag. This system (the Courses system) is being deprecated. As such, your account will soon be updated to remove these no longer supported flags. For details on the changes, and how to migrate to using the replacement system (the Programs and Events Dashboard) please see Wikipedia:Education noticeboard#NOTICE: EducationProgram extension is being deprecated.

Thank you! Sent by: xaosflux 20:28, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi admin please review and publish the page Draft:Prakash Neupane as you told me before you would review and get it done if it meets the requirements and wikipedia notability. So please this is my humble request . Alfajack (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 10:33, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Alfajack: Are there any chart positions for the hits? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:36, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• U Got Me was hit and was trending in Nepal and it was in the top chart of Kantipur Television Network, Radio Kantipur and Channel Nepal. Also has got million views on youtube. As you can check his itunes that he have more than 20 songs and 9 Music Videos. Also he has got featured in different famous Media so it seems he is notable so, if possible than publish it thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.34.20.94 (talk) 11:42, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Graeme Bartlett: But there are not any charts site of Nepal for the musician of Nepal so actually thats the main problem to show you. Alfajack (talk)

Thanks for the recent restores, can I also get that one, I'll add sources. Over 2,400,000 in tournament earnings. Valoem ^{talk contrib} 12:03, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Done see User:Valoem/Fred Goldberg Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:34, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Can you also restore Shorenstein Company, I'll see what sources I can add. I finished Meade Esposito, let me know if there are any grammar issues. Valoem ^{talk contrib} 20:53, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:10, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi admin please check the draft:Prakash Neupane and accept the article if possibled. Reply me if its not acceptable. Thankas 27.34.18.123 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 08:40, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Please review it. 27.34.20.129 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:40, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please reply me if draft:Prakash Neupane is not acceptable than i will remove it from wikipedia. 27.34.20.241 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 07:50, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am submitting to AFC. Since I cannot read nepali, or know much about music references I will let someone who knows more asses it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:57, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This looks like it has copyright issues, but it's not so much a copyvio from the link you posted, more close paraphrasing and an unattributed quote. This was from a new editor who probaly didn't understand, and it does use multiple sources. I've moved to draft and put a tag on it.--Pharos (talk) 22:03, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The topic may not be notable either. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:05, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

How the draft can be rejected by user who just joined 6 months ago. I dont’t think he knows Nepali because the artist draft:Prakash Neupane has been featured in huffpost, abc tv, khasokhas and other various national news sites which shows the person is notable. And he is featured in 7 wikipedias with diff language. So, please take a look after that. Thanks. 27.34.20.221 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:06, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can I get this userfied? Valoem ^{talk contrib} 21:59, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What do you want to do with it? Consider Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Monster-of-the-Week characters in The X-Files (it was a redirect here), But earlier, 22:14, 3 April 2009, there was a few paragraphs of content and 2 references. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:26, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Squeeze (The X-Files) with full history intact. I don't actually need userfication if you want to do that. This being one of the best monsters of the week episodes, he has some analytical coverage [3], [4] and this though it doesnt appear the movie was made. Valoem ^{talk contrib} 23:31, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK  Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:31, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have messaged you on Researchgate about my Wikipedia article Low thrust relative orbital transfer and that I have no problem releasing my thesis under a CC-BY-SA-3.0 license. Further I have added that I am the User:YajurKumar on Wikipedia in my introduction on researchgate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by YajurKumar (talk • contribs) 04:39, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Great. You have proved this beyond doubt then. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:46, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please move this to Larry Kudlow, undisputed commonname. JocularJellyfish (talk · contribs) is correct should be uncontroversial. Valoem ^{talk contrib} 18:56, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

moved. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:56, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Graeme. Thanks for looking over this page. I've slimmed down the use of quotations now - would you mind taking another look, please? Thanks. Fugitivedave (talk) 14:01, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The case examples still have unnecessary quotes. Quotes could be used for statements from the people in charge, where that quote has received wide coverage in the media. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:06, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can I get that userfied plus talk page? Valoem ^{talk contrib} 14:55, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your brave improvements in the article. It was in fact just a glitch with the language translation tool. Anyway, I inserted now the full translation. Thank again! Regards Minihaa (talk) 19:32, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I see you assessed the first cut of this article as Start: Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. See WP:ARTASS. It would be helpful if you could provide notes on the article's talk page (not here) saying what improvements you feel would be needed to bring the article up to C class: Useful to a casual reader. Better still, if the missing information is readily available perhaps you could add it. The casual reader is not the same as the average Joe. Presumably they have some level of interest in paramontroseite or they would not have looked it up or clicked on a link to it. I very rarely start articles on minerals and have no idea what people interested in them would be looking for. Thanks, Aymatth2 (talk) 23:05, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can I get Chance Morris and Sodapoppin userfied into one article or whatever is useful. This person is notable. Valoem ^{talk contrib} 19:40, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also Reckful, this person is notable now. Valoem ^{talk contrib} 19:53, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Chance Morris was considered an attack page, so it is best if start again from scratch. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:01, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sodapoppin was just about all vandalism, and only one incarnation that had enough context was a piece of porn. So that too should be started from scratch. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:06, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See User:Valoem/Reckful particularly history for better versions. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:09, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've created Chance Morris can you move it to Sodapoppin per commonname page is protected, and restore talk history. Valoem ^{talk contrib} 08:30, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:57, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Metal stitching, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Franchise (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I put the reason for the page being acceptable the way I created it on its Talk Page. Bodymindspirit (talk) 03:28, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear sir i think I have referenced the article properly as told by you and I think you should review and submit you. User Aditya Mani tripathi — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aditya Mani Tripathi (talk • contribs) 06:27, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Aditya Mani Tripathi: you added a couple to the list, so there may now be enough. Read WP:Referencing for beginners and use <ref></ref> tags to put the reference immediately after the text it supports. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:20, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article is ready to accepted by . And any grammatical mistakes will be edited are publishing the article sir please accept this — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aditya Mani Tripathi (talk • contribs) 08:10, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Aditya Mani Tripathi: I see you have made some small changes, but I still need you to attach the reference URL to the text it applies to. I am not worried about grammar or format, or URL only as this is fixable by copyeditors. For example <ref>http://www.empoweringindia.org/new/constituency.aspx?eid=692&cid=136</ref> should be inserted into a paragraph just after the statement of his political party. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:17, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I will be doing it in 2 min — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aditya Mani Tripathi (talk • contribs) 08:26, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Graeme Bartlett i belong to Faizabad and I was seeking through the article the topic and matter of article is correct that define late Dr. Brij Bhushan Mani Tripathi I think we should accept the article in review and I see that Aditya is working hard for this article . There is only 1 or 2 citing problems else are cleared. Hopping to be with my thoughts and accepting it . Ifaizabadi (talk) 08:56, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am new to hosting a page on wiki and doing it for a client of ours that wanted their journal page hosted on wikipedia. i am not from a software or any such background. I pretty much din't understand what your comment below meant; Comment: Independent sources are needed to show notability. These come from writers that are not connected with the journal. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:47, 20 March 2018 (UTC) Could you please help me understand. I much appreciate your time and inputs since that would help me provide the journal information in the right manner to the greater audience of wikipedia.

Thanks Cactuscom123 (talk) 08:38, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]