Jump to content

Talk:Trump fake electors plot

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by WeatherWriter (talk | contribs) at 18:57, 24 July 2022. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

POV Template

Noting: I added the POV template only because the main (and at the time of adding only) contributor has recently been involved in numerous political articles and political AfDs. I have also been involved in political articles, so I do not feel I am able to fully say it was wrote in a neutral POV. I would like for an editor, who hopefully hasn't wrote/participated in political articles recently, to go over the article and double check everything is in a neutral POV. If it is, please remove the template. Elijahandskip (talk) 18:28, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Elijahandskip: How does the fact that I have recently been involved in numerous political articles and political AfDs give rise to a POV concern? Have you spent time reading this article to identify specific concerns before instantly tagging it with a presumption of POV? soibangla (talk) 18:40, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

::As I stated, I do not feel like I could say it fully NPOV, so all I tagged it for was to have an editor that hasn't been doing political articles ensure it is neutral. Also, the comment I mentioned from the most recent AfD on your talk page is one reason I am wanting someone who doesn't edit political articles make sure it is NPOV. Elijahandskip (talk) 18:45, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the tag because you've said it was added to grossly talk-about-the-other-editor, not because you want to talk about improving the article for any alleged neutrality problems. If someone decides there is content at issue, sure they can put it back up with a link to a discussion thread that obeys our WP:P&G plus the Arbs ruling on US politics. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 18:48, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting how an editor who gave a barnstar to the sole contributor came in for the defense. Well, hopefully, it is NPOV because I don't want to read stuff about everyone's favorite conspiracy theory target. Elijahandskip (talk) 18:50, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You don't feel like you could say it fully NPOV? soibangla (talk) 18:54, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Noting: I struck all previous comments, aka recanting them, as I do not fell like having NPOV discussions about political articles. I'm going back to other topics. Elijahandskip (talk) 18:57, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]