User talk:Taylor Trescott/Archive 2

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Taylor Trescott. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

The drafting arbitrators have requested that you be formally added as a party to the Manning naming dispute case. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Manning naming dispute/Evidence. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Manning naming dispute/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Seddon ^talk 18:36, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Hello my good sir, all the problems you had with the article You Have 0 Friends have been fixed and hopefully will get into a good article. Thanks!

NCFan12312 (talk) 03:43, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Hey Taylor, I noticed you use Reflinks quite a bit. Something you might want to try is using this link rather then the current one (the one I used to use). The link I just provided fully expands the citations rather than having the short description and <--bot generated title--> thing. It does make small mistakes when it comes to authors sometimes, but those can always be fixed. I hope you find that version of Reflinks much more helpful! STATic message me! 23:44, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

What exactly do you want citation on on List of disability-related terms with negative connotations? EvergreenFir (talk) 02:21, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Which claims would you like verified? That the terms are considered offensive or the meaning of the terms? EvergreenFir (talk) 18:27, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Okay. I'll see if I can find citations for you. Just wasn't sure what you were looking for. EvergreenFir (talk) 18:31, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Yes, the topic of the planned film is getting and will likely continue to get lots of coverage, but when considering planned films we look to the applicable guideline and consider whether or not that coverage gives us anything solid about the film itself... casting, production, plot, etc. To be fair to our readers, I think a temporary redirect to either J.K. Rowling or the article on the 2001 book "Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them" by that author (and where this adaptation IS already written about), is a valid consideration. The arguments about how the film topic might become supremely notable have a bit of merit, but I think it logical that we send readers for now to where it makes sense under policy, guideline and essay to keep readers informed. If a redirect arrived at through AFD discussion is reverted, the page can be protected to prevent untimely recreation. What'cha think? Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 02:33, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jared Has Aides, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Assistant (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:41, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

I replaced the DVD cover with theatrical poster. Care to have DVD cover deleted? --George Ho (talk) 16:50, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Done, thanks. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 16:57, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

On 22 September 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Manos: The Hands of Fate (video game), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the references to MST3K in Manos: The Hands of Fate were made intentionally obscure to avoid copyright infringement? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Manos: The Hands of Fate (video game). You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 00:04, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for your help on Fuck, much appreciated, — Cirt (talk) 00:56, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Hello Taylor, Just saw on the notifications that you reviewed the article I proposed for GA. Where can I see your review? Thank you in advance. ρedro talk 20:34, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

The article Gunslinger (1956 film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Gunslinger (1956 film) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Erachima -- Erachima (talk) 22:12, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Asspen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paramount (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:13, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

On 29 September 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The Great Plane Robbery, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Jack Holt, who was afraid of flying, starred in The Great Plane Robbery? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Great Plane Robbery. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:04, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

In the afd of Michel Von Tell you voted delet without a real argumet? why? You just said - its not WP:NACTOR but i showed their it is? WP - BIO says
1 .Has been featured multiple times in notable mainstream media. MMnews (alexa rank 500 of germany), Russia today, paraguay television and some more. see in article.

2 Has had significant roles in multiple films, shows, or other productions. Films, audio books, shows, books, interviews, articles, big blogs etc see in article (witch was/is still under construction).

3 Has a large fan base.

It of course has! you see about 1 million views on YT. His politic dokumentation alone got about 100 000 views. and this is quite a lot if you keep in mind it is a documentary about geopolitics!! also it is SWITZERLAND - less people then NYC! and this 7 million people their got 4 diffent languages! finaly you see he had very much highly notable guests. and i also showed their the YT channel of the 2 biggest TV stations of the country. www.youtube.com/user/sfr/videos this the offical channel of the 2 biggest tv stations of switzerland SF1 SF2 Schweizer Fernsehen.

have a look at how many views they got and compare please!

and you also know - a single one of this 3 points would be good enough.

are this not quite many good arguments to keep this article? special if you keep in mind how small switzerland is, this article is just under construction? i mean hey. u know as good as me. 30% of Wikipedia got much less sources then this. would be nice if you could think about your voteing or let me know what exactly yor argument is.

but with 1 thing you are right. the afd is a mess :) thats why the person witch made the afd is a one edit account witch is personaly motivated and seams to dont like this journalist ideologically. thx for your attention and would be nice to get an objective feedback and vote. Adniim- (talk) 14:55, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Hello! I see that you reviewed an article I created, John Lemon (prospector) Sounds very helpful, but what does that mean, exactly? Thanks for filling me in. Juneau Mike (talk) 15:21, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply. Sounds good, I knew you were being helpful. It was just something I was unfamiliar with. Thanks for all of your efforts. Juneau Mike (talk) 01:16, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

• Talk:Chris Field (composer)/GA1

All set for revisit at Talk:Chris Field (composer)/GA1. — Cirt (talk) 17:50, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks very much for your review.

Incidentally, this was makes 100 WP:GA contributions to Wikipedia for me! :)

Cheers, — Cirt (talk) 21:58, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Ford Beebe.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Blurred Lines 00:58, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

I guess the text wasn't clear enough... sigh. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 01:01, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

On 5 October 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Duke of the Navy, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the 1942 film Duke of the Navy was an attempt to make a "light funster" out of Ralph Byrd? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Duke of the Navy. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 00:04, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

On 6 October 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Chris Sheridan (writer), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that writer Chris Sheridan, who has received three Emmy Award nominations for his work on Family Guy, initially feared that writing for it would end his career? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Chris Sheridan (writer). You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 16:05, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

On 7 October 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Gene Ruggiero, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that early in his career, film editor Gene Ruggiero often skipped work to play golf? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gene Ruggiero. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 16:03, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Blurred Lines 23:39, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Taylor, you opened this review about four weeks ago, but haven't posted any of the actual review yet. Did this fall off your radar, or are you unable to work on it? If the latter, we can put it back into the reviewing pool. Please let us know. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:20, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

On 9 October 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The House of Discord, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the cinematographer for The House of Discord was nearly fired after he attempted to recreate the glow of a fireplace? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The House of Discord. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 09:23, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

	An English breakfast for you!
	For your work on Peter Shin. Launchballer 06:12, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

I had a quick look over your user page. What is the film you mention that doesn't have an article?--Launchballer 15:00, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Meat Weed Madness.[1] Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 16:49, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

I've made a start on it here.--Launchballer 18:39, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

• Please see User talk:Launchballer#Madness indeed and User:Launchballer/Meat Weed Madness. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:59, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi Taylor. You recently initiated a discussion at WP:FFD Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 September 19#File:Trayvon Martin on the backseat of a car.png. Your post generated no discussion, as the interested parties were not notified. One editor posted on my talk page; please see User talk:Diannaa#File deletion: Trayvon Martin on the backseat of a car.png. In addition to notifying the original uploader, could you in the future please place a {{FFDC}} template on each instance where the file is in use? Similar templates are available for many of the deletion tags and processes. Thanks, – Diannaa (talk) 17:59, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:FamilyGuy Volume12.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Blurred Lines 13:50, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, I've tagged it with a G7. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 14:08, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:

1. Hitmonchan (talk · contribs) is indefinitely topic-banned from all pages relating to any transgender topic or individual, broadly construed.
2. IFreedom1212 (talk · contribs) is indefinitely topic-banned from all pages relating to any transgender topic or individual, broadly construed.
3. Tarc (talk · contribs) is indefinitely topic-banned from all pages relating to any transgender topic or individual, broadly construed.
4. Josh Gorand (talk · contribs) is indefinitely topic-banned from all pages relating to any transgender topic or individual, broadly construed.
5. Baseball Bugs (talk · contribs) is indefinitely topic-banned from all pages relating to any transgender topic or individual, broadly construed. He is also topic banned from all pages (including biographies) related to leaks of classified information, broadly construed.
6. David Gerard (talk · contribs) is admonished for acting in a manner incompatible with the community's expectations of administrators (see #David Gerard's use of tools).
7. David Gerard (talk · contribs) is indefinitely prohibited from using his administrator permissions (i) on pages relating to transgender people or issues and (ii) in situations involving such pages. This restriction may be first appealed after six months have elapsed, and every six months thereafter.
8. The standard discretionary sanctions adopted in Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Sexology for (among other things) "all articles dealing with transgender issues" remain in force. For the avoidance of doubt, these discretionary sanctions apply to any dispute regarding the proper article title, pronoun usage, or other manner of referring to any individual known to be or self-identifying as transgender, including but not limited to Chelsea/Bradley Manning. Any sanctions imposed should be logged at the Sexology case, not this one.
9. All editors, especially those whose behavior was subject to a finding in this case, are reminded to maintain decorum and civility when engaged in discussions on Wikipedia, and to avoid commentary that demeans any other person, intentionally or not.

For the Arbitration Committee, Rschen7754 01:36, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

As you previously participated in related discussions you are invited to comment at the discussion at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/RfC for AfC reviewer permission criteria. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:49, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Why oppose?

Just because of "points"?

Didn't you see User:Bencherlite comment that, quote, "points aren't everything"?

Don't you think it would be beneficial to bring to attention of readers the educational topic of scientific skepticism?

— Cirt (talk) 21:45, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

I moved it, again, to 6 November. This avoids some of those pesky penalty points. Perhaps now you could reconsider? — Cirt (talk) 22:00, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Projected Man you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jburlinson -- Jburlinson (talk) 00:20, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Earthbound (1940 film) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 19:13, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

It's a shame that you can't get around to it, because you know who HAS "been getting around to it" As a widely respected, by even the late Roger Ebert, film critic? Violet LeVoit. For some reason you have decided to nominate her article for deletion. Hundreds of reviews written for numerous publications, to include her years being the film critic at WYPR in Baltimore. Yes, she has also been an on-air personality as well. She's been busting her tail for a long time. I am asking you to rescind your deletion request.

Thank you Scottcarberry (talk) 20:27, 22 October 2013 (UTC) Scott Carberry

Pinging to remind you that the issues raised in this nomination still need to be addressed. If you're not interested in pursuing the nomination further, please let us know. It's been over a week since Orlady did the review, and someone could conceivably close it at any time after the standard week for a response. Hope to see a response shortly! BlueMoonset (talk) 01:56, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Oddball Hall at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 20:42, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

On 28 October 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Maggie Murphy hoax, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Maggie Murphy hoax revolved around an image of a giant potato? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Maggie Murphy hoax. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 00:05, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Eve Stewart at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 00:03, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

The article The Projected Man you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Projected Man for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jburlinson -- Jburlinson (talk) 00:03, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

		The Good Article Barnstar
		For your contributions to bring The Projected Man to Good Article status. Thanks, and keep up the good work! Do you plan to continue improving film articles for episodes of MST3000? -- Jburlinson (talk) 00:04, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

• Yep, totally. I have my eye on Alien from L.A. and Village of the Giants. Then I might start working on getting the main MST3K article to GA, and then Mystery Science Theater 3000: The Movie. So many things to do, so little time. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 00:05, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

• Congrats from me too, Taylor. Feel free to ping me if you nominate the main MST3K article, and I'll give you a review without a long wait; looks like that one would be worth a Half Million Award at least, so it'd be a great one to get to GA! -- Khazar2 (talk) 12:13, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

On 29 October 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Oddball Hall, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that according to a critic, the comedy film Oddball Hall "is...well...odd"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Oddball Hall. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 08:04, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

I probably ought to let you know about Template:Did you know nominations/Meat Weed Madness, if there is anything you would like to add to it.--Launchballer 10:52, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Why do you keep reverting the updates? 320 x 320 is just fine, so there's no reason for YOU to revert anything. Blurred Lines 00:41, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Owen Marks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Owen Marks until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Beerest355 Talk 00:20, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

On 4 November 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Jonathan Kaufer, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that when Jonathan Kaufer directed Soup for One, he became the youngest director at the time to be hired by a major studio? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jonathan Kaufer. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for your Support at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Fuck (film)/archive1. I've gone ahead and added DVD Verdict into the Reception section per your helpful suggestion. Thanks again, — Cirt (talk) 00:55, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

On 4 November 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The Projected Man, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that a scene with a topless woman was added into the British film The Projected Man to increase sales overseas? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Projected Man. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:44, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

On 4 November 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Leo Erdody, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that film composer Leo Erdody's potentially noble ancestry led to him occasionally billing himself as simply "Erdody"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Leo Erdody. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:45, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Please see User talk:Shaun0601#Robert Stanley Hilton (footballer born 1930). davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 02:59, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

On 5 November 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Earthbound (1940 film), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the screenwriter for the 1940 film Earthbound proposed including a pair of lovers wearing gas masks? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Earthbound (1940 film). You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 16:02, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

On 7 November 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Eve Stewart, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that award-winning production designer Eve Stewart described her experience as art director on Mike Leigh's Naked as "a bit of a shock"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Eve Stewart. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 13:37, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

I have fixed the issue that you have entitled in the discussion that the images were not described in the article(s) at all. Would this mean that you are going to withdrawn the FFD(s)? Blurred Lines 17:04, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

• I'm sticking with delete. The images are not the subject of any sourced discussion, and removing them would not be detrimental to the understanding of the reader. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 19:10, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

I've reviewed your DYK for Thomas Scott (archer) at Template:Did you know nominations/Thomas Scott (archer). Please take a look. violet/riga _^[talk] 23:56, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Stalled at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Soman (talk) 23:56, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Can you explain your logic? at WP:DOH, it's a standard that once we have a plot and airdate, to create the page. Especially when it's the next episode, a few days away. CTF83! 00:38, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

...well they typically only come out maybe a month before airdate. CTF83! 10:44, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

On 8 November 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Stalled, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the British film Stalled, about a man trapped in a woman's bathroom being attacked by zombies, has screened at Korean and Swedish film festivals? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Stalled. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 15:33, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

On 10 November 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The Marshall Mathers LP 2, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that "Berzerk", produced by Rick Rubin, and "Survival", which appears in Call of Duty: Ghosts, are both songs from Eminem's eighth studio album, The Marshall Mathers LP 2? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Marshall Mathers LP 2. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Orlady (talk) 01:04, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Send me your private email and I'll forward the Corthell articles you requested. John M Baker (talk) 17:02, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Why are you trying to delete the redirect of Brianna Harris and Anya Thomas? they are gorgeous and will probably get famous one day. so it is helpful to have them on this website. and you know Taylor's a girl's name right? hahaha

On 12 November 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Thomas Scott (archer), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that archer Thomas Scott holds the distinction of being the oldest person to compete in an archery event at the Summer Olympics? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Thomas Scott (archer). You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Taylor Trescott, just so you know, even if the article being nominated for DYK is moved, the DYK nomination template should not be moved, because it breaks a number of things. When an article is moved, the template stays right where it is, but its DYKnompage and DYKmake templates (and DYKnom, if any) are adjusted accordingly. If you're not sure how to make those adjustments, someone will be happy to assist. (I noticed that you moved the Murder of Ayakannu Marithamuthu template, which was neither necessary nor appropriate.) Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 07:11, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Oops, sorry about that. I'll take care not to do it again. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 11:55, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

No rush on the GA review for A Cure for Pokeritis of course, but I just wanted to let you know that I got very lucky, with the aid of the special collections librarian at UCLA, and have been able to include information from Vitagraph's 1912 house periodical, including the music the studio recommended to be played during the film's showing. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 23:51, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Heh, I actually planned to start reviewing that as soon as I finish work on How Brown Saw the Baseball Game. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 23:53, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Sounds like a plan. And it's nice to see more work being done on silent films. I'd picked this topic more or less at random, but seeing how much work there is to be done on early American film, I may have to spend some more time in that topic space. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 15:25, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi Taylor, would you mind putting off reviewing this article for GA? See, I'm entering the Wikicup again next year, and I was counting on the long queue. I figured that I'd nominate it now, so that when someone got around to it, I'd be able to submit it for points. Strategy, right? I mean, dude, there are articles that have been languishing there since July! Go review one of those, or at least review one that's been in the queue longer than under a day. ;) I'm being a little serious; it seems a little unfair to me that an article I submit is there for such a short time, when others have had to wait much much longer. Unless you have a reason for reviewing it now, just let me know and we can talk. Otherwise, I can withdraw the nomination if you like. Thanks for understanding. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 19:28, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Done (it was actually an accident, I enabled the feedback so I figured I'd review it.) Apologies! Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 19:29, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Ok, no problem. Appreciate your swift response! And they say WP editors are...well, you know. ;) Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 19:48, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

I've responded to your concerns about the Tony Swatton DYK. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 22:01, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Can you clear it now, given the issue has been fixed? The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 10:30, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Miraculous Journey at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Gamaliel (talk) 04:28, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

On 19 November 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Don Lerman, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Don Lerman once ate seven quarter-pound sticks of salted butter in five minutes? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Don Lerman. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 00:04, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

On 19 November 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Last Clear Chance, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that a reviewer for DVD Verdict branded the safety film Last Clear Chance as "hyper somber"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Last Clear Chance. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 16:03, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

On 20 November 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article How Brown Saw the Baseball Game, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the 1907 film How Brown Saw the Baseball Game, about a very drunk man watching a baseball game, used trick photography to show players running in reverse? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/How Brown Saw the Baseball Game. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 08:14, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article How Brown Saw the Baseball Game you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Khazar2 -- Khazar2 (talk) 01:22, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

• WP:WikiProject Freedom of speech

There is a WikiProject about Freedom of speech, called WP:WikiProject Freedom of speech. If you're interested, here are some easy things you can do:

1. List yourself as a participant in the WikiProject, by adding your username here: Wikipedia:WikiProject_Freedom_of_speech#Participants.
2. Add userbox {{User Freedom of speech}} to your userpage, which lists you as a member of the WikiProject.
3. Tag relevant talk pages of articles and other relevant pages using {{WikiProject Freedom of speech}}.
4. Join in discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Freedom of speech.
5. Notify others you think might be interested in Freedom of speech to join the WikiProject.

Thank you for your interest in Freedom of speech, — Cirt (talk) 04:00, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

For delsorting my AfDs. Thanks. BTW, how do you install the delsort script? I forget. Beerest 2 talk 19:58, 26 July 2013 (UTC) 20:23, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Just copy my common.js to yours and you'll get it. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 20:25, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

		The Good Article Barnstar
		For your contributions to bring How Brown Saw the Baseball Game to Good Article status. Thanks, and keep up the good work! -- Khazar2 (talk) 12:11, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

The article How Brown Saw the Baseball Game you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:How Brown Saw the Baseball Game for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Khazar2 -- Khazar2 (talk) 12:12, 23 November 2013 (UTC)