User talk:Bkatcher

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2

Is an MSNBC produced short documentary not a notable work? Wikipedia lists MSNBC as a 'generally reliable source'.

Section removed: In 2022, Harvard Law Lecturer, Rebecca Richman Cohen, produced a short documentary entitled THE RECALL: REFRAMED exploring the unintended consequences of the recall of Judge Aaron Persky which came at the height of the #MeToo movement in 2018. The film used the Turner case to critique the knee-jerk demand for harsh sentences to address sexual violence – a demand that disproportionately impacts low-income and people of color. It asks how we might imagine better ways of addressing sexual violence, opening the door to conversations about restorative and transformative justice, and truly supporting survivors. ^[1]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Black Kite (talk) 22:59, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

65.50.136.45 will answer your questions you asked on Opportunity (rover) 1. What is Oppy? Well, Oppy is the nickname for the Opportunity rover. "Opportunity, also known as MER-B (Mars Exploration Rover – B) or MER-1, and nicknamed Oppy,[8] is a robotic rover that was active on Mars from 2004 until mid-2018."

The Unsourced part of the timeline diverts from an earlier edit made by me. Then, it got deleted. I revised the part and put it back, but I must forgotten the resources.

Sincerely, 65.50.136.45 (talk) 19:25, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine, but Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and we don't refer to things in the article body by nicknames. When don't refer to Abraham Lincoln, for instance, as Honest Abe in the article or Ronald Reagan as The Gipper. Thank you for your other fine edits.Bkatcher (talk) 20:16, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your advice! 65.50.136.45 (talk) 20:22, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• United States Navy Strike Fighter Tactics Instructor program
  • has recent large deletes
• Talk:United States Navy Strike Fighter Tactics Instructor program
  • has a list of notable graduates that need citations
• if you are interested ... 0mtwb9gd5wx (talk) 23:15, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Right back atcha. Bkatcher (talk) 22:53, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Bkatcher: 0mtwb9gd5wx (talk) 23:16, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But Arthur, malediction sucks so hard, Bkatcher. It sucks so hard. Stvincent1999 (talk) 18:48, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have absolutely no doubt about that, it sounds dreadful. But with 120 years of cinema, we have to be very selective about what's here. It can't merely suck, it has to be one of those cautionary tales of filmmaking that people will be talking about in 2050. Bkatcher (talk) 19:40, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I know. That's why i think it's one of the worst films i've have ever seen. Didn't made me scared one bit it reminds me like Friedberg and Seltzer, The Wicker Man, Blair Witch 2: Book of Shadows, I Know Who Killed Me and the sequels excluding Jim Carrey (minus Evan Almighty due to me loving it), I mean I love Arthur and the Invisibles trilogy, but this film disrespects my favorite into a soler cheap horror cash grab flick despite being a children's franchise, That's why is one of the worst films of all time. Stvincent1999 (talk) 20:52, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I only love those movies because of Freddie Highmore while the rest featured Snoop Dogg and Mia Farrow and the first one one of my favorite comedians Jimmy Fallon David Bowie and Robert De Niro. Stvincent1999 (talk) 20:53, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Funny you should mention Fia Farrow. I just watched Avalanche (1978 film). Not her best work. Ever see On Deadly Ground? Bkatcher (talk) 12:54, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I know, Bkatcher. That's why Arthur, malediction is one of the worst movies ever made, because its disrepects the franchise and tasteless like Caddyshack 2. Stvincent1999 (talk) 16:01, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It sucks when they make a poor sequel to an excellent work. The same thing happened to my favorite book, Catch-22. Bkatcher (talk) 23:20, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I know. Bkatcher. Stvincent1999 (talk) 09:50, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just hope that Arthur, malediction might receive Golden Raspberry Awards (or Razzie) nominations, Bkatcher. Stvincent1999 (talk) 17:39, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 06:56, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have no issue with your explanation in reverting my edit, but why is the last American veteran listed then?Juve2000 (talk) 16:50, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

He should not be listed either. I'll remove him. Bkatcher (talk) 16:53, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Bkatcher. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Chris Troutman (talk) 14:53, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day! Hi Bkatcher! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:05, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The undue edit you did was incorrect. concurrent is the correct word — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:805:8600:4DB0:21C5:F12B:371:6C23 (talk) 05:13, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, if he's serving back to back life sentences, they're consecutive, not concurrent. Bkatcher (talk) 13:27, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I thought that since Bush was only the second Vice-President to live at the residence after Walter Mondale and since he was elected as President that I could be listed as a fact. [1] I also assumed that since the source I provided in the article included this picture of Bush living at the residence after his victory that it provided that fact.

--And1987 (talk) 04:53, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I can see the fact being relevant, but a picture doesn't confirm that he was the FIRST former VP to live there. Bkatcher (talk) 13:12, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How about if we use this source? [2] --And1987 (talk) 15:37, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Works for me. Bkatcher (talk) 16:22, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Reverend Mr. Black is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Reverend Mr. Black until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

PaulGamerBoy360 (talk) 21:50, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]