Jump to content

Talk:Final statement

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot (talk | contribs) at 20:56, 1 February 2024 (Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Redirect" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Death}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Final statement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:58, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Final statement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:28, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Last dying speeches

[edit]

I have merged content from Last dying speeches, which now redirects here. From Talk:Last dying speeches note the following comments. jnestorius(talk) 17:00, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! To improve this article I suggest looking at pag. 306 of the book "Tales of the hanging court" written by Robert Shoemaker and John Hitchcock. I saw something about the last words of the condemned in this page and the following ones. Elia7491 (talk) 15:20, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! I'd like to suggest Andrea McKenzie's essay "From true confessions to true reporting? The decline and fall of the Ordinary's Account" and Lincoln B. Faller's book "Turned to Account" as references. I think you too could find them useful. GMari92 (talk) 15:09, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This article

[edit]

...consisted, essentially, of a kind of definition of the term "final statement", followed by a long, long list of things that were considered "final statements". That is not how we write articles. Besides the matter of original research, for which the article was tagged four years ago (a matter that subsequent editors who added more material did not address), there is the problem that this is simply not how we write articles. Imagine if we wrote Film or Government or K-pop that way. So while Dmol reverted saying "no consensus", they failed to address the problems or the argument. It is worth noting that the entire article seems to be redundant to List of last words--which unfortunately has the exact same problem. Drmies (talk) 21:32, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh wow. That was long ago. I see nothing has changed. Interestingly, there is a section for this in the other article. But that other article is a mess for being so indiscriminate, and both suffer from being largely unreliable (many of these quotes, like Socrates', were likely made up). Prinsgezinde (talk) 02:30, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I propose we either merge this article with List of last words or move it to List of final statements. Koopinator (talk) 11:26, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Since my proposal has not met any opposition, i'll go ahead and implement it. Koopinator (talk) 09:10, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Final_statement&oldid=1202003546"