Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Restoring Honor rally

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Requests for mediation

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by BS24 (talk | contribs) at 20:04, 3 October 2010 (←Created page with '{{Medcombox/top|article={{subst:SUBPAGENAME}}}} ==={{subst:SUBPAGENAME}}=== {{Medcombox | article = {{subst:SUBPAGENAME}} | mediator = | parties = | opened = {{subs...'). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Restoring Honor rally

Request for formal mediation
ArticleRestoring Honor rally (talk) 
Submitted03 Oct 2010
MediatorNot yet assigned
StatusAwaiting party agreement
NotesNone

Dispute specifics

Involved users
  1. BS24 (talk · contribs), filing party
  2. Morphh (talk · contribs)
  3. Akerans (talk · contribs)
  4. 82.135.29.209 (talk · contribs)
  5. Xenophrenic (talk · contribs)
  6. BritishWatcher (talk · contribs)
  7. AzureCitizen (talk · contribs)
  8. Hodgson-Burnett's Secret Garden (talk · contribs)
  9. Wikiposter0123 (talk · contribs)
  10. The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous (talk · contribs)
Articles concerned in this dispute
Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted

List of talk page discussions:

Issues to be mediated

Primary issues
  • The entire crowd size section. There is a certain estimate of 87,000 by CBS News and AirPhotosLive.com which claims to be a scientific estimate of the crowd and thus the most authoritative. Four of the editors listed seem to agree, and five do not. The question is whether a long paragraph should be devoted to this estimate, detailing the methods and whatnot, which seems to give the estimate undue weight. Recently I tried to overhaul the whole crowd size section and replace it with a simple table of estimates with references provided. Two editors disagreed and I was banned for accused edit warring. The dispute reached a relative calm last week but has been reignited. It's a month in and we're still fighting over it, which is quite ridiculous. BS24 (talk) 20:04, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Additional issues (added by other parties)
  • Additional issue 1
  • Additional issue 2

Parties' agreement to mediation

All parties please indicate below whether they agree to mediation of this dispute; remember to sign your post. Extended comments should be made on the talk page of this request.
  1. Agree. BS24 (talk) 20:04, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decision of the Mediation Committee

A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate whether this request is to be accepted or rejected. Notes concerning the request and questions to the parties may also be posed by a committee member in this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_mediation/Restoring_Honor_rally&oldid=388528811"