User talk:Doctorhawkes

Check the news for new Australian PM. ABC is showing it live now — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.215.163.47 (talk) 11:53, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, no worries. I think you just jumped the gun a little on the first changes. Doctorhawkes (talk) 11:56, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.outertech.com/en/clipboard-historyWelcome!

Hello, Doctorhawkes, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Anna Lincoln (talk) 11:20, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Out of curiosity of fairness for "Blue Links Only" justification for removal of individuals, should this not also be applied to "Matt Frazier" of Local Natives" then? You left this red link live on the wiki. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:E000:6291:C200:B438:2795:753B:8966 (talk) 09:43, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Curious. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:E000:6291:C200:B438:2795:753B:8966 (talk) 10:01, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the band is notable and blue-linked, but members of the band only get individual articles if they do something of note individually. That's my justification, anyways.Doctorhawkes (talk) 22:19, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The person you removed, Rene Michelle Aranda, the youngest sister of Michael Aranda, won a national acting award (for which she shaved herself bald for if you cared to research it). They flew her from L.A. to Washington D.C. for it (see front page of Collegian) & it was the first time the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts had ever issued an award of this nature in its 42 years since being founded in 1969. All of this information can be found on the KCACTF website which was cited & blue-linked along with the link to Cinelatino, the Spanish Television network she produces feature films for, including the very first television series Cinelatino will air- information on film specifics can be found both on IMDb & the Cinelatino website (where you'll find Emmy nominated actress Vannessa Vasquez starred in the first movie she produced). Production updates regarding the upcoming television series are documented throughout the production company's IMDb (was cited) as well as throughout social media, where it might come up that another film she produced received a raving 5-star review commending the diversity of her cast (which according to IMDb, she didn't just produce but cast & also helped write the movie). Tally those credits and you'll find she produced 5 feature films in her first year working for Cinelatino. Her 2nd year, the network's status-quo breaking television series, 22 years after its launch.

Her brother is a vlogger (in a few of whom's videos she is featured) and yet he's got his own page (which she is mentioned on). Sure, he's got 200,000 subs but 30 million people watch Cinelatino in 60 Spanish speaking territories, including all of North America. She's even been the subject of a Ms. In The Biz article, where it touches on how she founded her own production company (listed on corporationwiki). And now (though it can't be cited yet to anything other than the various social media pages of Nickelodean stars Sol Rodriguez & Reinaldo Zavarce and the casting company Selekt Casting, it seems she has cast them in an upcoming project called Cartel.

If you have Netflix, she's a household name in your own space. Watch Expelled and you'll find she's a cast member in that web-star studded film.

I don't know about you but for a 24 year old chick (let alone anybody), that's all pretty notable... Cleaning up an edit is understandable. Prettying up formatting is always appreciated. But deleting mention of a pro-active native's cited achievements makes it look like you didn't really do much research before you edited... just my thought, anyways.

It sounds like you should create an article for her & then her notability can be judged properly. Sounds like you have plenty of sources. Give it a go. Doctorhawkes (talk) 22:58, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Do you know which Shirnack played tonight? Jason or Alan? The SMH says Jason and others say Alan. Cheers,  florrie  13:51, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy! It was Alan. Great to have a win after so long. Doctorhawkes (talk) 10:50, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll go and change it. Yes, great game considering they weren't playing at their best and with so many injuries! I had the pleasure of watching it with a group of WT fans I've met up with over here in the West, so it was an even better win!  florrie  11:33, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I don't have any great issues with the way that it was, changed it whilst checking that it would fit into two lines; had it not I would have reverted it back. The other reason I went down that road was the two liner seems to be the standard throughout the rlp and wider sporting projects.This deal is getting worse all the time. (talk) 07:29, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi im taylor can you tell me what you undid on the harry wells page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.43.229.203 (talk) 23:49, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Taylor. I undid the info about his family. Not because it was wrong, but because there was no source for it. On the other hand, I wasn't aware that he was originally known as Wills, and have found a reference for that.Doctorhawkes (talk) 06:54, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi its talyor again So do you konw were he lives now see no one knows these things and as my mum says its a shame no one knows were he lives. I think people should now were he lives what do u say doctorhawkes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.43.229.203 (talk) 10:02, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I was wondering if you could do me a favour and clarify your position on the including mention of notable fans in rugby league team articles at the Sydney Roosters' talk page. I've brought up the ambiguity here.--Jeff79 (talk) 18:29, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made to User Talk:Youndbuckerz has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thank you. I see you posted to Youndbuckerz (talk · contribs)'s talk page about this edit, however I fail to see how it is vandalism, vandalism "is any addition, removal, or change of content made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia.". You may disagree with the edit, it may not be cited, but it was NOT vandalism. Please refrain from either using "vandalism" in an edit sum, or posting vandalism talk page templates unless you fully understand what vandalism is. Thanks. Codf1977 (talk) 08:27, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, it may be wrong, it may be un-sourced, in which, as you know better, remove the text with "Unsourced - xyz is capt." and then use {{Uw-unsourced1}} on the talk page. Codf1977 (talk) 11:22, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Codf1977 (talk) 11:48, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, was just looking around & saw you've put all the Tigers stuff up on George Ndaira's page. Are you sure about this, like do you have any sources, because i haven't seen anything about it around that was reliable. While just a few days ago the Newcastle Herald stated he signed with Kurri Kurri. Josh the newcastle fan (talk) 06:39, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, mate. I didn't put it up, I just prettied it up some, but I do see he's listed to player for balmain this week. Myself, I'm reluctant to put up anything when they're only playing for the feeder club.

Here's the team list from the WT site: http://www.weststigers.com.au/default.aspx?s=article-display&id=34088&title=balmain-team-to-play-bulldogs-in-nsw-cupDoctorhawkes (talk) 06:47, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, that's a suitable source, just checking. Josh the newcastle fan (talk) 07:01, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Bill keato.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:06, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. It has been written and also documented that "Robert E. Lee" refers to the general, not the boat. See my footnote in the article The Night They Drove Old Dixie Down. Best. --- Wikiklrsc (talk) 00:59, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ta. It's good to have that cleared up, Doctorhawkes (talk) 23:54, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As best as we can. Bests --- (Bob) Wikiklrsc (talk) 13:32, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gregory's Guide says Ipswich won it in 1957 & 58, Toowoomba in 1959 & 60. It's p220 if you want to cite it and the publication details appear on this article if you want to use them. I see that Danmiles started the Bulimba Cup article a long time ago. Seems like we haven't heard much from him lately-Sticks66 12:31, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Just regarding this edit. He appears to have played almost all of his career in Ipswich which made me think maybe he represented Ipswich in the Bulimba Cup instead of Brisbane? Just wanted to check.--Jeff79 (talk) 09:24, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're too quick! Thanks for the pickup. Doctorhawkes (talk) 09:28, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Working Class Man, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Journey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article doesn't have any sources, and I'm not sure what a source for that would be. I don't see why you deleted just my edit, when you can google "jinx count to ten" and see it is all over the place. 67.168.11.194 (talk) 04:51, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to seem harsh. As the page says, there are a "myriad of highly varied rules". Unfortunately, trying to list them all without a decent reference leads to nonsense list of variations. I'll have a look and see if I can find a good source.Doctorhawkes (talk) 05:38, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I like my addition though, and I don't think it really screws the article up too much, at least until someone comes along to turn it into something literary... I'm kidding, I guess, but if you don't mind I'd like to put it back. Here's a book: https://www.google.com/search?q=jinx+count+to+ten&btnG=Search+Books&tbm=bks&tbo=1 Is that a source? Seems as good as any. Thanks for responding. 67.168.11.194 (talk) 03:34, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2.223.105.40 (talk) 13:15, 24 August 2015 (UTC)Alright then, what is the 2011 population of Burnley, there is no point including a statistic that is 14 years out of date without a more up to date statistic to compare with.[reply]

I don't think "All of Burnley borough apart from Deerplay with Coalclough, Briercliffe and Cliviger with Worsthorne 2011" really helps much at all. The average read has no idea what that means.Doctorhawkes (talk) 21:23, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Croydon173314 (talk) 07:04, 25 August 2015 (UTC)Ok, what if I just add a reference telling you where I got my information from.Croydon173314 (talk) 07:04, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It always helps. Doctorhawkes (talk) 07:31, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I do not know if you still have a passing interest in this article, but I have added various references, mainly regarding Howard's pop music involvement. I noted your comment on the article's talk page, but thought it more prudent to post a reply (of sorts) here. The user you identified has not made any edit since May last year. Any thoughts ?

Derek R Bullamore (talk) 23:21, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Doctorhawkes; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 23:36, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. The page in question originally was written without any citable references to support the claims. I have removed anything without citable references. I explained that. Rather than just undoing the edit I suggest you instead dig up references for that material (I couldn't find any, but you might have better luck). Cheers, Miles Gillham (talk) 08:13, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

see Wikipedia:Link rot. "Do not delete cited information solely because the URL to the source does not work any longer. WP:Verifiability does not require that all information be supported by a working link, nor does it require the source to be published online." I'll have a look to see if I can get any help from the Wayback machine later. Doctorhawkes (talk) 14:09, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you have to delete her name on the list? When in fact the reference I put clearly states that she is an Australian composer and everybody knows she writes her own songs. Please help me understand. DerrickGavinLam

Hi! Yeah, there's no doubt that she writes her own songs. As per the page, it's a list of "composers of classical music, contemporary music and/or film soundtracks", contemporary music being modern classical music. Please forgive me if she has composed this type of music, but otherwise I'd say she was better classified as a song-writer.Doctorhawkes (talk) 00:30, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've noticed that a lot of your recent edits are mangling wikilinks by adding ./ at the start and replacing spaces by underscores [1]. I guess this might be a problem with the visual editor. Could you carefully check your work. It might also help if you report which browesr your using at Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Feedback#./ and the bugzilla bug at [2].--Salix (talk): 03:14, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up. All rectified now. Think I'll stick to regular editing from now on.Doctorhawkes (talk) 03:56, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mr. Doctorhawke

I have reveiwed your stupidity to revert the Pete Townshend solo album Empty Glass, and i'm rather not pleased i find your stupidity awfully rude because you know duck all about The Who my dear Aussie, Docter, Republic wanting, Highness, who drinks milk, who live's happily and like's hurting my god damn feelings, Oh and i would like to play rugby with you somtime don't forget to take a plane that crashes and you to me is a "Meaningless Statistic"

BY THE WAY IT'S NOT THE FIRST TIME YOU'VE F****D UP & just to let you know you are a TW*T no not Twit you daft D*CK it'll be funny when you find out you don't have one you traded it for being an Arseh*le

My awfally bad regards

  Mr. Jay Bowden. King of Aussieland and our brittish queen

Please stop deleting our content! What are you trying to do????!!! If people add stuff to an article, you shouldn't just go around deleting it! What's wrong with having more information about a topic? Think about what I'm saying, and do the right thing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.190.152.95 (talk) 06:33, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Too Late the Hero (album) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [[My Wife]] and family – that if you write about hookers, you must go to [[Prostitution|hookers]]), and if you write about [[drug]]s, you must take [[drug]]s. I got this reputation for sinister

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:24, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mr/Miss/Ms/Mrs Doctorhawkes as a thank you for all your hard work of sweating blood and tears I have (SEVERLY) edited the page that you created titled "Unlimited Address" by Catfish adding a image file and lot's and lot's of infomation.
Kind Regards

	The Editor's Barnstar
	No. 1 random editor award goes to the One and Only Mr/Miss/Ms/Mrs Doctorhawkes jb423 16:38, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi! Would you care to review or comment at my FA nomination for the article Marquee Moon, an article about a rock music album? Information on reviewing an FA nomination's criteria is available at WP:FACR. If not, feel free to ignore this message. Cheers! Dan56 (talk) 07:39, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

• File:Bill keato.jpg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 03:11, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The thing is James Maloney is *such* a common name that sooner or later the disambiguation is going to have to happen. Downwoody (talk) 00:00, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I also suspect most of the links can be handled by editing Template:Sydney Roosters squad, which I have now done. Downwoody (talk) 00:04, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Would you care to review my FA nomination for the article Of Human Feelings? The article is about a jazz album by Ornette Coleman, and the criteria for FA articles is at WP:FACR. If not, feel free to ignore this message. Cheers! Dan56 (talk) 03:55, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Robert Forster 2008.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 03:25, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ian Moss with Cold Chisel 2015.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 03:32, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think you missed that this image on flickr is under a "no-derivatives" licence so I've had to delete it sorry - Peripitus (Talk) 06:33, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Same goes for File:Don Walker at Queenscliff.jpg - Peripitus (Talk) 06:36, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for fixing that up. I've been reading the guidelines and I'm hoping I've got it all covered now!Doctorhawkes (talk) 08:03, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Love the work that you are doing on the Go-Betweens albums, keep it up. Dan arndt (talk) 09:28, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any reviews for "I Need Two Heads" that you can add to the article? Dan arndt (talk) 11:28, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Afraid not. Doctorhawkes (talk) 11:49, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have granted the "rollbacker" permission to your account. After a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, contact me and I will remove it. Good luck and thanks. – Gilliam (talk) 09:39, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's fine! I've made that mistake on occasion.

Best,

GAB (talk) 21:56, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Doctorhawkes, give me some encouragement please. I've put a bit of effort into upgrading sourcing on the Kosta Nikas page and I'm continuing to work on the article for the LA Shorts Fest - which happens to be a long running, well-regarded Oscar-springboard for its category winners. Please tell me we're heading in the right direction. :) AS_Sydney (talk) 14:17, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Doctorhawkes,

How are you?

First of all, thanks a lot for your corrections, I really liked that article and if I can remember more songs about cities or I listen to them, I'll put some more info in the article.

About what you corrected me about Jalisco, I knew it was a state, not a city; but in that song they talk about a city, Gudalajara, which is the state's capital, I didn't know how to manage that information.

About Waimarama, it was somehow the same but the opposite..., as you can see in the article about Waimarama. Waimarama is a place in Hastings, New Zealand.

Thanks again,

Bye Gaudio (talk) 15:07, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

All good. I've added those 2 entries back under Guadalajara & Hastings. Doctorhawkes (talk) 21:12, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Aurangzeb: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 09:44, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think the RT rating points in the direction of "widely regarded", but doesn't explicitly prove that to be the case. I have tweaked the sentence. - HappyWaldo (talk) 00:41, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Doctorhawkes,

I have noticed that after 6 days of survival, you reversed my edits for four square. My helpful edits. These edits improved the textual "pizzazz" of the page, as some simple grammar was upgraded to Wikipedia standards, as well as additional moves and structuring. Now, you reversed my edits for the reason "There are many variations and moves". The grammar edits haven't a thing to do with the moves. So now I ask you, why did you reverse the edits that improved grammar? I'm sure that a/an FA article wouldn't have content entitled "Court", rather than "Playing environment" (not that I expect the article to attain FA status). I apologize if I potentially sounded angry/offensive, as that is not my intentions. As a valiant Wikipedia, I do not intend to cause malice. So, would it be possible to reverse your edit completely? Or can I just reapply the grammar fixes?

Best regards,
Enigma

[ EnigmaLord515 (talk) 22:16, 13 October 2015 (UTC) ][reply]

I have no problem at all with your grammar changes which just got caught up in the reversion. I'll see if I can fix it now. However, the addition of modifications does not have a reliable source and there are a million schools with their own variations.

Thanks for discussing so civilly. Doctorhawkes (talk) 06:34, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for fixing the grammar. :)

Message by,

Enigma [ EnigmaLord515 (talk) 19:49, 14 October 2015 (UTC) ][reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Luke Brooks.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 03:14, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Luke Brooks.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 03:14, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Luke Brooks.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Steel1943 (talk) 03:42, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Luke Brooks.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 03:43, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of rock instrumentals, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Utopia (band) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Norm has been a painter occasionally. I saw episodes of him in Cheers. But I don't know whether labeling him "painter" is suitable in infobox. By the way, I didn't add "painter" in the infobox. --George Ho (talk) 05:02, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ciriaco Mescia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Roy Masters

Kevin McGuinness (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Roy Masters

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Doctorhawkes! Saw your rv on this article and comment. I would never usually do that, but I've been in intense discussions with others on the David Bowie article, in which I'd put quotes. These caused upset and were in many cases contracted and paraphrased by others. Not quite the same as what I did in this instance, but. Pearce's English is clearly awful as quoted; it reads better as i've presented. What I've used is a common journalistic method. Wrong here, though? Boscaswell (talk) 21:40, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Boscawell. Yeah, anything in quotations mark should be verbatim from the original. Of course, paraphrasing the meaning of the sentence also has its place. I should also say, good work on the Pearce article. It was good to see a voice of reason there amongst the nonsense. Doctorhawkes (talk) 09:08, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. All the best! Boscaswell talk 03:36, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've just done today's update. It's getting long, the Australia Day party section, but the story is massive. It would be easy to argue that the section is out of balance compared to the stuff about his playing career, but when I first looked at that there was next to nothing. That area could do with some expansion - I'll leave it to others. Right now the section about the Party scandal needs to be kept up to date, otherwise Wiki looks pretty stupid. All the best! Boscaswell talk 17:02, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to see this http://www.coldchisel.com/cold-chisel-release-new-video-for-the-backroom-second-single-from-their-forthcoming-album-the-perfect-crime/

Ian must have made a mistake in his interview.

YoshiKong (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 12:42, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies. Doctorhawkes (talk) 21:03, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hucklebuck (horse), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Futurity Stakes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of songs about cities, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Williamson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Cameron King.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:05, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Rod Griffin.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:05, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I was wondering why you reverted my edit to "Holiday (Vampire Weekend song)"? You didn't give a reason in your edit summary. I thought it was a legitimate link to the YouTube video. But if I've done something wrong could you let me know what it was? I've been a Wikipedia editor for better than 10 years now, usually just minor stuff, so it's a little surprising to have something reverted that I thought was fairly insignificant. Thanks! --Egpetersen (talk) 00:30, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, I should have left an edit summary referring to WP:VIDEOLINK. I'm guessing you were more interested in having the video as an external link? If not, a reference like http://www.stereogum.com/586571/vampire-weekend-soundtracks-hilfiger-honda-holiday-ads/video/ would be a lot better. Doctorhawkes (talk) 01:15, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, just when I think I know all the policies, a new one comes up that I've never seen before. Thank you for the explanation. I'll link the Stereogum article instead, as that YouTube video doesn't appear to be a legitimate upload. --Egpetersen (talk) 13:36, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm sorry if this comes across as a bit terse, but where do you expect this to be discussed exactly? I checked the talk page before making the edit, but all I found was an IP posting about its chords, so I naturally assumed that the page received basically no traffic. I changed its classification from "soft rock" to "rock" because I don't see how this song can be classified as "soft". I'm not sure why a reference would be necessary for that; are Eagles songs just automatically classified as soft rock?

I'm very interested to hear your perspective on the matter. Kurtis ^(talk) 04:54, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Yes, the talk page is the best place to discuss. I don't have a strong opinion one way or the other, but Eagles articles have a looong history of genre-warring. Myself, I would never describe the song as "disco", but that's why there's a ref there to support it. Most of their singles have referenced genres. Doctorhawkes (talk) 05:43, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The talk page of any article is the standard place to discuss changes, but nobody even posts on that one, and the article doesn't get enough activity for me to feel confident that my attempt at discussion would even garner attention. I guess I could look for a reference of some sort. I'm actually of the opinion that "soft rock" is more in need of a reference than simple "rock", as the former implies... well, softness. Kurtis ^(talk) 20:39, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you post on the talk page and no one objects after a few days, go ahead and change. But really, looking for a ref aint that hard. "Soft rock" seems to be the most referenced on their other articles. Doctorhawkes (talk) 21:27, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The key phrase here is "other articles" - One of These Nights sounds different from Desperado or Tequila Sunrise, for example. Those are soft rock songs. This track, not so much (I don't think). Kurtis ^(talk) 21:39, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the The Go-Betweens page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am new to editing on Wiki and I am not sure how it works though I have read some background material. I refer to the Wiki entry *The Go-Betweens.* What prompted me to put in my first edit was an interview this week between Robert Forster and a journalist with the Australian national television broadcaster, the ABC. The young journalist opined the Go-Betweens were an influential band in Australia. This is historically incorrect, certainly during Grant McLennan's lifetime. Robert Forster did not correct the reporter, I presume because he thought this would interrupt the flow of the interview Anyway, in the Legacy section, I wrote a reference to the neo-novel *Iraqi Icicle* which offers a wry explanation of why the Go-Betweens did not attain the success some thought they deserved. I think you deleted my first attempted edit and I thought I had made an error so I provided a revised entry. This was again deleted with the note "*(again, interesting, but not notable)" The irony is that among mainstream media the Go-Betweens were not "notable" between the years 1977 and 1989. I read the guidelines on people and notability and they refer to the creation of a new article rather than an edit of a section. If you are suggesting notability applies to an edit, is it the novel itself or its author which is not notable? The definition of notable includes "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded" As far as the quote from the novel goes you describe it as interesting. I believe this quote which provides food for thought on its own justifies the inclusion of Iraqi Icicle in the legacy section. I would ask you allow my edit to return to the Go-Betweens page.

Prometheus Unbound (talk) 10:45, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Prometheus

Firstly, it's great to see anyone wanting to improve Go-Bees articles. And i found the information you contributed personally interesting.

It's also pretty common to include links to other notable works. Considering we are talking about the band's legacy, it would be appropriate that those other works meet WP:GNG. It's not a sign of the band's legacy if they were mentioned in a novel that was not notable enough to have it's own article. Doctorhawkes (talk) 11:35, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Doctorhawkes, I find your argument acceptable if we use a narrow definition of legacy. I take legacy to have a post-modern meaning of an interesting piece of art, music or literature which draws upon (however tangentially) a previous piece. As I say, the reason I would like the quotation from the novel included is it is a rare source which addresses the lack of success of the band. As an analogy, I draw you attention to an item of Legacy for the song 16 tons: July 2013, in Ukraine, the song was recently covered[29] by ukrabilly (Ukrainian folk) group "Ot Vinta!" Neither ukrabilly nor Ot Vinta has a Wiki entry in its own right but the entry evokes a lot of thoughts. (One of them for me was the suspicion ukrabilly might be better defined as Ukranian rockabilly) What surprises me is the Red Army Choir is NOT listed under legacy for 16 tons: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4kxO4tfiXHU Prometheus Unbound (talk) 09:51, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Did you really mean to revert the first edit by a new user? I believe strongly in the WP:NOBITE policy so I just tidied up their edit to make it a bit more acceptable. While it might be a piece of spam/advertising for Dominos, it may also just be a helpful local wanting to add information. I think we have to assume good faith at this stage. We desperately need new users wanting to contribute to Australian content so and I think we need to be tolerant of their first edits unless it's really problematic or in obvious bad faith. Kerry (talk) 21:59, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Good call by you. Didn't realise it was a new user. Thanks. Doctorhawkes (talk) 22:01, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My subsequent edit probably made that hard for you to notice. Thanks for reverting. Kerry (talk) 22:30, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

At the article's talk page, there was a discussion between @TheOldJacobite: and myself on this issue. You may wish to justify your position on this matter there.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 22:20, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

IP user reported and temporarily blocked. Will continue to keep an eye on it.Dan arndt (talk) 09:42, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:08, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery

HI, the venues are located NSW so that is why it has the color and NSW. Please, if you have to talk to me i more detail then start. I'm sorry if i'm making you mad it's just i'm 12 years old and all of those tables had taken four days — Preceding unsigned comment added by LachlanCarr12 (talk • contribs) 07:08, 31 May 2017 (UTC) Thank you. because i'm a bit young i over read the thye state sorry.[reply]