User talk:Ama975193

Hello, Ama975193, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Third Battle of Panipat have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome.  —Cpt.a.haddock (talk) (please ping when replying) 08:18, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Zawl. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Battle of Chamkaur (1704)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — Zawl 18:54, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sikh Regiment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punjab Regiment (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sikh Regiment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joginder Singh (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ama975193. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Upma Sharma, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Upma Sharma to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,

–Ammarpad (talk) 12:44, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It appears you are re-adding unreliable sources, sources without page numbers, and restoring misrepresented source(s), without any explanation. These types of actions will result in the notification of an Admin. --Kansas Bear (talk) 06:25, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Utcursch. I noticed that you recently removed content from Guru Hargobind without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. utcursch | talk 19:21, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Early Afghan-Sikh Wars has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

None of the sources mention the term "Early Afghan-Sikh Wars" -- this is the creator's OR. See talk page.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. utcursch | talk 16:40, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rajiv Gandhi International Airport. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. The edit in question is this. — LeoFrank  ^Talk 15:42, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ama975193. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ama975193. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of Chamkaur (1704), you may be blocked from editing.

• If you remove referenced information from another article, I will report you. --Kansas Bear (talk) 02:56, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of Chamkaur. Alivardi (talk) 10:21, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sikh Regiment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bikram Singh (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:21, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Rescue of Brahmin Girl has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacks notability. No idea where in the (not independent) source this story is included, and I can't find sources verifying the defeat of Mohammad and Isa Khan by Baghel Singh.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 16:51, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sir excuse me i m going to tell u the page no. 47 read the second paragraph please Ama975193 (talk) 17:19, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Ama975193: your article has moved to draft space for prior research time given. Please see WP:RS for additional reference idea. You can use Template:Tsxl when your draft is ready for review. If you revert it to the mainspace, it will be deleted further without no notice. 🇮🇳GoWB🇮🇳 (ask me any questions) 16:25, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Afghan–Sikh Wars, you may be blocked from editing. --Kansas Bear (talk) 17:30, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok kansas bear sir Ama975193 (talk) 17:16, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kansas Bear Sorry Sir Ama975193 (talk) 17:17, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ama975193 (talk) 17:18, 8 December 2020 (UTC)Sorry[reply]