Jump to content

User talk:SchroCat: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:SchroCat/Archive 25) (bot
Case closed
Line 10: Line 10:
Hi SchroCat, hope you are keeping well. Not sure if you are aware of this discussion but I thought I better give you the heads up to be on the safe side in case you want to comment on the matter: [[Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Unban_request_by_Light_show]]. [[User:Betty Logan|Betty Logan]] ([[User talk:Betty Logan|talk]]) 03:30, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi SchroCat, hope you are keeping well. Not sure if you are aware of this discussion but I thought I better give you the heads up to be on the safe side in case you want to comment on the matter: [[Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Unban_request_by_Light_show]]. [[User:Betty Logan|Betty Logan]] ([[User talk:Betty Logan|talk]]) 03:30, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
:Thanks Betty. I hadn't seen the thread, so I'll keep an eye on it, although it looks like it's unlikely to gain much sympathy. They've managed to continue the same behaviour in the thread as that which led to their initial ban, which is never a great way to have things overturned! Cheers - [[User:SchroCat|SchroCat]] ([[User talk:SchroCat#top|talk]]) 04:11, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
:Thanks Betty. I hadn't seen the thread, so I'll keep an eye on it, although it looks like it's unlikely to gain much sympathy. They've managed to continue the same behaviour in the thread as that which led to their initial ban, which is never a great way to have things overturned! Cheers - [[User:SchroCat|SchroCat]] ([[User talk:SchroCat#top|talk]]) 04:11, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

==[[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Civility in infobox discussions]] closed==
An arbitration case regarding civility in infobox discussions has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:

# Any uninvolved administrator may apply infobox probation as a discretionary sanction. ''See the full decision for details of infobox probation.''
# Standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for all discussions about infoboxes and to edits adding, deleting, collapsing, or removing verifiable information from infoboxes.
# Cassianto is indefinitely placed on infobox probation.
# The Arbitration Committee recommends that well-publicized community discussions be held to address whether to adopt a policy or guideline addressing what factors should weigh in favor of or against including an infobox in a given article and how those factors should be weighted.
# All editors are reminded to maintain decorum and civility when engaged in discussions about infoboxes, and to not turn discussions about a single article's infobox into a discussion about infoboxes in general.
# For canvassing editors to this case, Volvlogia (talk · contribs) is admonished. They are warned that any further instances of canvassing related to arbitration processes will likely result in sanctions.

: Discuss this at: '''[[Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Civility in infobox discussions closed]]'''

For the arbitration committee, [[User:GoldenRing|GoldenRing]] ([[User talk:GoldenRing|talk]]) 08:59, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:59, 28 March 2018

Light show

Hi SchroCat, hope you are keeping well. Not sure if you are aware of this discussion but I thought I better give you the heads up to be on the safe side in case you want to comment on the matter: Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Unban_request_by_Light_show. Betty Logan (talk) 03:30, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Betty. I hadn't seen the thread, so I'll keep an eye on it, although it looks like it's unlikely to gain much sympathy. They've managed to continue the same behaviour in the thread as that which led to their initial ban, which is never a great way to have things overturned! Cheers - SchroCat (talk) 04:11, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An arbitration case regarding civility in infobox discussions has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:

  1. Any uninvolved administrator may apply infobox probation as a discretionary sanction. See the full decision for details of infobox probation.
  2. Standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for all discussions about infoboxes and to edits adding, deleting, collapsing, or removing verifiable information from infoboxes.
  3. Cassianto is indefinitely placed on infobox probation.
  4. The Arbitration Committee recommends that well-publicized community discussions be held to address whether to adopt a policy or guideline addressing what factors should weigh in favor of or against including an infobox in a given article and how those factors should be weighted.
  5. All editors are reminded to maintain decorum and civility when engaged in discussions about infoboxes, and to not turn discussions about a single article's infobox into a discussion about infoboxes in general.
  6. For canvassing editors to this case, Volvlogia (talk · contribs) is admonished. They are warned that any further instances of canvassing related to arbitration processes will likely result in sanctions.
Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Civility in infobox discussions closed

For the arbitration committee, GoldenRing (talk) 08:59, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]