Jump to content

Talk:Chris Brown: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by 68.156.159.10 to last revision by Flyer22 (HG)
Tag: repeating characters
Line 40: Line 40:


== What may become continuous mentions about domestic violence case interviews ==
== What may become continuous mentions about domestic violence case interviews ==
551425151513216512135616351215465105218645155555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555

I know that the December 04, 2009 ''[[20/20]]'' interview is somewhat important to mention, but I am thinking ahead about how many more times Brown may be interviewed about this domestic violence case. I do not feel that every time he is interviewed about it, we should mention it. The subsequent interviews will most likely be mostly redundant. Instead, I say that if he does a few more interviews about it after this interview or answers in-depth questions about it in some other way, then we simply note that Brown has continued to talk about the matter on separate occasions. Of course...if there is something worth mentioning regarding the subsequent interviews, then we should mention that. [[User:Flyer22|Flyer22]] ([[User talk:Flyer22|talk]]) 21:24, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
I know that the December 04, 2009 ''[[20/20]]'' interview is somewhat important to mention, but I am thinking ahead about how many more times Brown may be interviewed about this domestic violence case. I do not feel that every time he is interviewed about it, we should mention it. The subsequent interviews will most likely be mostly redundant. Instead, I say that if he does a few more interviews about it after this interview or answers in-depth questions about it in some other way, then we simply note that Brown has continued to talk about the matter on separate occasions. Of course...if there is something worth mentioning regarding the subsequent interviews, then we should mention that. [[User:Flyer22|Flyer22]] ([[User talk:Flyer22|talk]]) 21:24, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:59, 5 December 2009


Chris Brown on Larry King Live about domestic violence incident

If no one does it before I do, I will add information about this. If someone beats me to it, I will simply tweak what I feel needs tweaking (if anything). I feel that it should not be too much, in the same way that I kept his apology through YouTube about the incident short. But there are some non-redundant parts about this domestic violence case seen in this interview: That his mother was with him during this interview as he talked about the matter and how he witnessed seeing her get beat by his stepfather when he was a child (though he has mentioned witnessing this before, it is different in this case), and his saying that he does not remember beating Rihanna; his saying that he does not remember beating Rihanna stirred some controversy (though we probably should not mention "controversy" since it was not a media blitz one), and Brown later stated that he actually does remember along with maintaining that he is not "that person."

I made this section so that we can all work out the best way to relay this Larry King Live interview. Flyer22 (talk) 00:24, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Its not big enough to warrant a new section, I'd just say add a new paragraph to the domestic violence case section. The Bookkeeper (of the Occult) 00:34, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, that is exactly what I am saying, Bookkeeperoftheoccult. Flyer22 (talk) 01:07, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I added the information. Any good tweaking of it is welcomed. I understandably could not keep it as short as the YouTube matter, and also chose not to put in most of what Brown said about the matter of why he said he did not remember assaulting Rihanna. He released a long statement about that, where he says the editing was off and other stuff, but all that is not really needed. Flyer22 (talk) 03:37, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If someone wants to add a bit about his explanations of having said he does not remember the assault, I, however, do not mind. The only part there now about his explaining the comment is saying that night is still a blur for him. The reason I did not add a little more about his explanations of the "I don't remember" comment is because I could not see the best way to add it in without it seeming as though the information about the matter should have stopped where I left it at. Flyer22 (talk) 03:58, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It looks good from what I can tell. The back and forth "I remember, I don't remember, its a blur" is a tad confusing, but I don't think that can be helped much. I think this is well written enough considering this article has not had a peer review so far. The Bookkeeper (of the Occult) 08:36, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, thanks for the feedback. Flyer22 (talk) 10:24, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Brown also added in that he rihanna are still in love, and she forgives him. Chris also will be having a new concert called,"Grafitti off the wall" where fans are welcome to come on stage and dance with him. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.28.167.53 (talk) 00:52, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New (leaked) single - "Changed Man"

It's about time that we mention that single. Because I noticed someone created a redirect "Changed Man" to the album about Brown's newest album Exclusive even though the song is not included in that album. Andrewlp1991 (talk) 06:41, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is it even a single? As far as I know, it was just leaked and Brown's label denied that it was his comeback single. — ξxplicit 06:53, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]


it says "according with him" in one part of the article when it should say "according to him" —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nametagnsht (talkcontribs) 17:58, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mistake On the Page!!

Under the section: "2009–present: Graffiti and domestic violence case" it says "according with him" instead of "according to him"

You should have just fixed it yourself. I will fix it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.117.70.6 (talk) 00:25, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

-Frank Quintero November 3, 2009 8:10PM GMT -5 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.115.219.48 (talk) 02:10, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What may become continuous mentions about domestic violence case interviews

551425151513216512135616351215465105218645155555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555 I know that the December 04, 2009 20/20 interview is somewhat important to mention, but I am thinking ahead about how many more times Brown may be interviewed about this domestic violence case. I do not feel that every time he is interviewed about it, we should mention it. The subsequent interviews will most likely be mostly redundant. Instead, I say that if he does a few more interviews about it after this interview or answers in-depth questions about it in some other way, then we simply note that Brown has continued to talk about the matter on separate occasions. Of course...if there is something worth mentioning regarding the subsequent interviews, then we should mention that. Flyer22 (talk) 21:24, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]