Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2008 Hurricane Ike Houston Apartment Status
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Snow'ed in Houston. Completely unencyclopedic article. seicer | talk | contribs 00:26, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- 2008 Hurricane Ike Houston Apartment Status (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Slightly messy, just a table and a few words. This article is not very useful to many users. I suggest move it to Hurricane Ike. Jer10 95 Talk 03:19, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Nothing here to save; this is a global encyclopedia. / Blaxthos ( t / c ) 03:44, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - sees to be someone's idea of keeping people infored of the status of apartents during the hurricane. Fr33kmantalk APW 03:58, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete There's plenty of other blog services (and even local media services) that could host this information in a better format. Nate • (chatter) 04:10, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No information seems to be present, and it's uncited in any event (so WP:NOR applies). I'm sure this fails at least a couple of the WP:NOT tenets. Even as a work in progress, I don't see this having any apparent point or context so even userfy doesn't apply. 23skidoo (talk) 05:21, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, unencyclopedic. Wikipedia is not a web host. --Dhartung | Talk 07:33, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete Messy. Unecyclopedic. Wikipedia not a web host. But leaning keep if article will associate itself with the effects of the Hurricane. Prowikipedians (talk) 08:28, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Even if it does, I don't see it as a viable separate article; as part of a larger overview of the effects of the hurricane, yes. 23skidoo (talk) 17:55, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per several WP:NOT guidelines (and possibly all of them) Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 13:03, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Do not redirect to Effects of Hurricane Ike in Texas#Houston as it is an implausible typo IMO. Pie is good (Apple is the best) 13:16, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and do not redirect. Fails a lot of WP:NOT. McWomble (talk) 13:59, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NOT#DIRECTORY and do not redirect anywhere. If this information is covered in reliable sources, it should at most receive a brief mention in Effects of Hurricane Ike in Texas. –Black Falcon (Talk) 19:50, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, fails a lot of WP:NOT guidelines. RockManQ (talk) 20:30, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.