Lightweight C++20 testing framework.

The goal of snitch is to be a simple, cheap, non-invasive, and user-friendly testing framework. The design philosophy is to keep the testing API lean, including only what is strictly necessary to present clear messages when a test fails.

• Features and limitations
• Example
• Example build configurations with CMake
  • Using snitch as a regular library
  • Using snitch as a header-only library
• Example build configuration with meson
• Example build configuration with vcpkg
• Benchmark
• Documentation
  • Detailed comparison with Catch2
  • Test case macros
    • Standalone test cases
    • Test cases with fixtures
  • Test check macros
    • Run-time
    • Compile-time
    • Run-time and compile-time
    • Exception checks
    • Miscellaneous
  • Advanced API
  • Tags
  • Matchers
  • Sections
  • Captures
  • Custom string serialization
  • Reporters
    • Built-in reporters
    • Overriding the default reporter
    • Registering a new reporter
  • Output colors
  • Command-line API
  • Selecting which tests to run
  • Using your own main function
  • Exceptions
  • Header-only build
  • IDE integrations
  • clang-format support
• Contributing
• Code of conduct
• Why the name snitch?

• No heap allocation from the testing framework, so heap allocations from your code can be tracked precisely.
• Works with exceptions disabled, albeit with a minor limitation (see Exceptions below).
• No external dependency; just pure C++20 with the STL.
• Compiles template-heavy tests at least 50% faster than other testing frameworks (see Release benchmarks).
• By defaults, test results are reported to the standard output, with optional coloring for readability. Test events can also be forwarded to a reporter callback for reporting to CI frameworks (Teamcity, ..., see Reporters).
• Limited subset of the Catch2 API, see Comparison with Catch2.
• IDE integrations using existing Catch2 plugins/adaptors.
• Additional API not in Catch2, or different from Catch2:
  • Matchers use a different API (see Matchers below).
  • Additional macros for testing constexpr and consteval expressions.

If you need features that are not in the list above, please use Catch2 or doctest.

Notable current limitations:

• No multithreaded test execution yet; the code is thread-friendly, this is just not implemented.

Supported compilers:

• Mininum: GCC 10, recommended: GCC 11.
• Minimum: Clang 10, recommended: Clang 13.
• Minimum: MSVC 14.30 (compiler 19.29).

This is the same example code as in the Catch2 tutorials:

#include <snitch/snitch.hpp>

unsigned int Factorial( unsigned int number ) {
    return number <= 1 ? number : Factorial(number-1)*number;
}

TEST_CASE("Factorials are computed", "[factorial]" ) {
    REQUIRE( Factorial(0) == 1 ); // this check will fail
    REQUIRE( Factorial(1) == 1 );
    REQUIRE( Factorial(2) == 2 );
    REQUIRE( Factorial(3) == 6 );
    REQUIRE( Factorial(10) == 3628800 );
}

Output:

And here is an example code for a typed test, also borrowed (and adapted) from the Catch2 tutorials:

#include <snitch/snitch.hpp>

using MyTypes = snitch::type_list<int, char, float>; // could also be std::tuple; any template type list will do
TEMPLATE_LIST_TEST_CASE("Template test case with test types specified inside snitch::type_list", "[template][list]", MyTypes)
{
    REQUIRE(sizeof(TestType) > 1); // will fail for 'char'
}

Output:

Here is an example CMake file to download snitch and define a test application:

include(FetchContent)

FetchContent_Declare(snitch
                     GIT_REPOSITORY https://github.com/snitch-org/snitch.git
                     GIT_TAG        v1.2.0) # update version number as needed
FetchContent_MakeAvailable(snitch)

set(YOUR_TEST_FILES
  # add your test files here...
  )

add_executable(my_tests ${YOUR_TEST_FILES})
target_link_libraries(my_tests PRIVATE snitch::snitch)

snitch will provide the definition of main() unless otherwise specified.

Here is an example CMake file to download snitch and define a test application:

include(FetchContent)

set(SNITCH_HEADER_ONLY 1)

FetchContent_Declare(snitch
                     GIT_REPOSITORY https://github.com/snitch-org/snitch.git
                     GIT_TAG        v1.2.0) # update version number as needed
FetchContent_MakeAvailable(snitch)

set(YOUR_TEST_FILES
  # add your test files here...
  )

add_executable(my_tests ${YOUR_TEST_FILES})
target_link_libraries(my_tests PRIVATE snitch::snitch-header-only)

One (and only one!) of your test files needs to include snitch as:

#define SNITCH_IMPLEMENTATION
#include <snitch_all.hpp>

See the documentation for the header-only build for more information. This will include the definition of main() unless otherwise specified.

First, meson build needs a subprojects directory in your project source root for dependencies. Create this directory if it does not exist, then, from within your project source root, run:

> meson wrap install snitch

This downloads a wrap file, snitch.wrap, from WrapDB to the subprojects directory. A [provide] section declares snitch = snitch_dep, and that guides meson's wrap dependency system to use a snitch install, if found, or to download snitch as a fallback.

The provided snitch_dep dependency is retrieved and used in a meson.build script, e.g.:

snitch_dep = dependency('snitch')

test('mytest', executable('test','test.cpp',dependencies:snitch_dep) )

Alternatively, you can git clone snitch directly to subprojects/snitch. A wrap file is then optional. You can retrieve the dependency directly (as is necessary in meson < v0.54):

snitch_dep = subproject('snitch').get_variable('snitch_dep')

If you use snitch only as a header-only library then you can disable the library build by configuring with:

• -D snitch:create_library=false

Otherwise, if you use snitch only as a regular library, then you can configure with:

• -D snitch:create_header_only=false

And this disables the build step that generates the single-header file "snitch_all.hpp".

See the dedicated page in the docs folder.

The following benchmarks were done using real-world tests from another library (observable_unique_ptr), which generates about 4000 test cases and 25000 checks. This library uses "typed" tests almost exclusively, where each test case is instantiated several times, each time with a different tested type (here, 25 types). Building and running the tests was done without parallelism to simplify the comparison. The benchmarks were run on a desktop with the following specs:

• OS: Linux Mint 21.2, linux kernel 6.2.0-26-generic.
• CPU: AMD Ryzen 5 2600 (6 core).
• RAM: 16GB.
• Storage: NVMe.
• Compiler: GCC 10.5.0 with -std=c++20.

The benchmark tests can be found in different branches of observable_unique_ptr:

• snitch: https://github.com/cschreib/observable_unique_ptr/tree/snitch
• Catch2 v3.4.0: https://github.com/cschreib/observable_unique_ptr/tree/catch2
• doctest v2.4.11: https://github.com/cschreib/observable_unique_ptr/tree/doctest
• Boost.UT v1.1.9: https://github.com/cschreib/observable_unique_ptr/tree/boost_ut

Description of results below:

• Build framework: Time required to build the testing framework library (if any), without any test.
• Build tests: Time required to build the tests, assuming the framework library (if any) was already built.
• Build all: Total time to build the tests and the framework library (if any).
• Run tests: Total time required to run the tests.
• Library size: Size of the compiled testing framework library (if any).
• Executable size: Size of the compiled test executable, static linking to the testing framework library (if any).

Results for Debug builds:

Results for Release builds:

Notes:

• No attempt was made to optimize each framework's configuration; the defaults were used. C++20 modules were not used.
• Boost UT was unable to compile and pass the tests without modifications to its implementation (issues were reported).

See the dedicated page in the docs folder for a breakdown of Catch2 features and their implementation status in snitch.

Given that snitch mostly offers a subset of the Catch2 API, why would anyone want to use it over Catch2?

• snitch does not do any heap allocation while running tests. This is important if the tests need to monitor the global heap usage, to ensure that the tested code only allocates what it is supposed to (or not at all). This is tricky to do with Catch2, since some check macros will trigger heap allocations by using std::string and other heap-allocated data structures. To add to the confusion, some std::string instances used by Catch2 will fall under the small-string-optimization threshold, and won't generate heap allocations on some implementations of the C++ STL. This makes any measurement of heap usage not only noisy, but platform-dependent. If this is a concern to you, then snitch is a better choice.

• snitch has a much smaller compile-time footprint than Catch2, see the benchmarks above. If your tested code is very cheap to compile, but you have a large number of tests and/or assertions, your compilation time may be dominated by the testing framework implementation (this is the case in the benchmarks). If the compilation time with Catch2 becomes prohibitive or annoying, you can give snitch a try to see if it improves it.

• snitch can be used as a header-only library. This may be relevant for very small projects, or projects that do not use one of the supported build systems. Note however that doing so will likely nullify any compile-time advantage over alternative testing libraries; this is not recommended if compilation time is a concern.

• snitch has better reporting of typed tests (template test cases). While Catch2 will only report the type index in the test type list, snitch will actually report the type name. This makes it easier to find which type generated a failure.

• snitch is able to test and decompose expressions both at run-time and compile-time in the same build (see CONSTEXPR_CHECK). Catch2 on the other hand is only able to test at compile-time (but not decompose) in one build, and test and decompose at run-time in a different build (using STATIC_CHECK).

If none of the above applies, then Catch2 will generally offer more value.

TEST_CASE(NAME, TAGS) { /* test body */ }

This must be called at namespace, global, or class scope; not inside a function or another test case. This defines a new test case of name NAME. NAME must be a string literal, and may contain any character, up to a maximum length configured by SNITCH_MAX_TEST_NAME_LENGTH (default is 1024). This name will be used to display test reports, and can be used to filter the tests. It is not required to be a unique name. TAGS specify which tag(s) are associated with this test case. This must be a string literal with the same limitations as NAME. See the Tags section for more information on tags. Finally, test body is the body of your test case. Within this scope, you can use the test macros listed below.

TEMPLATE_TEST_CASE(NAME, TAGS, TYPES...) { /* test code for TestType */ }

This is similar to TEST_CASE, except that it declares a new test case for each of the types listed in TYPES.... Within the test body, the current type can be accessed as TestType. The full name of the test, used when filtering tests by name, is "NAME <TYPE>". If you tend to reuse the same list of types for multiple test cases, then TEMPLATE_LIST_TEST_CASE() is recommended instead.

TEMPLATE_LIST_TEST_CASE(NAME, TAGS, TYPES) { /* test code for TestType */ }

This is equivalent to TEMPLATE_TEST_CASE, except that TYPES must be a template type list of the form T<Types...>, for example snitch::type_list<Types...> or std::tuple<Types...>. This type list can be declared once and reused for multiple test cases.

TEST_CASE_METHOD(FIXTURE, NAME, TAGS) { /* test body */ }

This is similar to TEST_CASE, except that the test body is interpreted "as if" it was a member function of a class deriving from the FIXTURE class. This means the test body has access to public and protected members of FIXTURE, but not to private members. Each time the test is executed, a new instance of FIXTURE is created, the test body is run on this temporary instance, and finally the instance is destroyed; the instance is not shared between tests.

TEMPLATE_TEST_CASE_METHOD(NAME, TAGS, TYPES...) { /* test code for TestType */ }

This is similar to TEST_CASE_METHOD, except that it declares a new test case for each of the types listed in TYPES.... Within the test body, the current type can be accessed as TestType. If you tend to reuse the same list of types for multiple test cases, then TEMPLATE_LIST_TEST_CASE_METHOD() is recommended instead.

TEMPLATE_LIST_TEST_CASE_METHOD(NAME, TAGS, TYPES) { /* test code for TestType */ }

This is equivalent to TEMPLATE_TEST_CASE_METHOD, except that TYPES must be a template type list of the form T<Types...>, for example snitch::type_list<Types...> or std::tuple<Types...>. This type list can be declared once and reused for multiple test cases.

The following macros can only be used inside a test body, either immediately in the body itself, or inside a function called by the test. They cannot be used if a test is not running (e.g., they cannot be used as generic assertion macros).

The macros in this section evaluate their operands are run-time exclusively.

REQUIRE(EXPR);

This evaluates the expression EXPR, as in if (EXPR), and reports a failure if EXPR evaluates to false. On failure, the current test case is stopped. Execution then continues with the next test case, if any. The value of each operand of the expression will be displayed on failure, provided the types involved can be serialized to a string. See Custom string serialization for more information. If one of the operands is a matcher and the operation is ==, then this will report a failure if there is no match. Conversely, if the operation is !=, then this will report a failure if there is a match.

CHECK(EXPR);

This is similar to REQUIRE, except that on failure the test case continues. Further failures may be reported in the same test case.

REQUIRE_FALSE(EXPR);

This is equivalent to REQUIRE(!(EXPR)), except that it is able to decompose EXPR (otherwise, the !(...) forces evaluation of the expression, which then cannot be decomposed).

CHECK_FALSE(EXPR);

This is equivalent to CHECK(!(EXPR)), except that it is able to decompose EXPR (otherwise, the !(...) forces evaluation of the expression, which then cannot be decomposed).

REQUIRE_THAT(EXPR, MATCHER);

This is equivalent to REQUIRE(EXPR == MATCHER), and is provided for compatibility with Catch2.

CHECK_THAT(EXPR, MATCHER);

This is equivalent to CHECK(EXPR == MATCHER), and is provided for compatibility with Catch2.

The macros in this section evaluate their operands are compile-time exclusively. To benefit from the run-time infrastructure of snitch (allowed failures, custom reporter, etc.), the test report is still generated at run-time. However, if the operands cannot be evaluated at compile-time, a compiler error will be generated.

These macros are recommended for testing consteval functions, which are always evaluated at compile-time. For constexpr functions, which can be evaluated both at compile-time and run-time, prefer the CONSTEXPR_* macros described below.

CONSTEVAL_REQUIRE(EXPR);

Same as REQUIRE(EXPR) but with operands evaluated at compile-time.

CONSTEVAL_CHECK(EXPR);

Same as CHECK(EXPR) but with operands evaluated at compile-time.

CONSTEVAL_REQUIRE_FALSE(EXPR);

Same as REQUIRE_FALSE(EXPR) but with operands evaluated at compile-time.

CONSTEVAL_CHECK_FALSE(EXPR);

Same as CHECK_FALSE(EXPR) but with operands evaluated at compile-time.

CONSTEVAL_REQUIRE_THAT(EXPR, MATCHER);

Same as REQUIRE_THAT(EXPR, MATCHER) but with operands evaluated at compile-time.

CONSTEVAL_CHECK_THAT(EXPR, MATCHER);

Same as CHECK_THAT(EXPR, MATCHER) but with operands evaluated at compile-time.

The macros in this section evaluate their operands both are compile-time and at run-time. To benefit from the run-time infrastructure of snitch (allowed failures, custom reporter, etc.), the test report is still generated at run-time regardless of the above. However, if the operands cannot be evaluated at compile-time, a compiler error will be generated.

These macros are recommended for testing constexpr functions, which can be evaluated both at compile-time and at run-time. Since the operands are also evaluated at run-time, the test will contribute to the coverage analysis (if any), which is otherwise impossible for purely compile-time tests (e.g., CONSTEVAL_* macros above).

CONSTEXPR_REQUIRE(EXPR);

Same as REQUIRE(EXPR) but with operands evaluated both at compile-time and run-time.

CONSTEXPR_CHECK(EXPR);

Same as CHECK(EXPR) but with operands evaluated both at compile-time and run-time.

CONSTEXPR_REQUIRE_FALSE(EXPR);

Same as REQUIRE_FALSE(EXPR) but with operands evaluated both at compile-time and run-time.

CONSTEXPR_CHECK_FALSE(EXPR);

Same as CHECK_FALSE(EXPR) but with operands evaluated both at compile-time and run-time.

CONSTEXPR_REQUIRE_THAT(EXPR, MATCHER);

Same as REQUIRE_THAT(EXPR, MATCHER) but with operands evaluated both at compile-time and run-time.

CONSTEXPR_CHECK_THAT(EXPR, MATCHER);

Same as CHECK_THAT(EXPR, MATCHER) but with operands evaluated both at compile-time and run-time.

REQUIRE_THROWS_AS(EXPR, EXCEPT);

This evaluates the expression EXPR inside a try/catch block, and attempts to catch an exception of type EXCEPT. If no exception is thrown, or an exception of a different type is thrown, then this reports a test failure. On failure, the current test case is stopped. Execution then continues with the next test case, if any.

CHECK_THROWS_AS(EXPR, EXCEPT);

This is similar to REQUIRE_THROWS_AS, except that on failure the test case continues. Further failures may be reported in the same test case.

REQUIRE_THROWS_MATCHES(EXPR, EXCEPT, MATCHER);

This is similar to REQUIRE_THROWS_AS, but further checks the content of the exception that has been caught. The caught exception is given to the matcher object specified in MATCHER (see Matchers). If the exception object is not a match, then this reports a test failure.

CHECK_THROWS_MATCHES(EXPR, EXCEPT, MATCHER);

This is similar to REQUIRE_THROWS_MATCHES, except that on failure the test case continues. Further failures may be reported in the same test case.

REQUIRE_NOTHROW(EXPR);

This evaluates the expression EXPR inside a try/catch block. If an exception is thrown, then this reports a test failure. On failure, the current test case is stopped. Execution then continues with the next test case, if any.

CHECK_NOTHROW(EXPR);

This is similar to REQUIRE_NOTHROW, except that on failure the test case continues. Further failures may be reported in the same test case.

FAIL(MSG);

This reports a test failure with the message MSG. The current test case is stopped. Execution then continues with the next test case, if any.

FAIL_CHECK(MSG);

This is similar to FAIL, except that the test case continues. Further failures may be reported in the same test case.

SKIP(MSG);

This reports the current test case as "skipped". Any previously reported status for this test case is ignored. The current test case is stopped. Execution then continues with the next test case, if any.

SKIP_CHECK(MSG);

This is similar to SKIP, except that the test case continues. Further failure will not be reported. This is only recommended as an alternative to SKIP() when exceptions cannot be used.

snitch::notify_exception_handled();

If handling exceptions explicitly with a try/catch block in a test case, this should be called at the end of the catch block. This clears up internal state that would have been used to report that exception, had it not been handled. Calling this is not strictly necessary in most cases, but omitting it can lead to confusing contextual data (incorrect section/capture/info) if another exception is thrown afterwards and not handled.

Tags are assigned to each test case using the Test case macros, as a single string. Within this string, individual tags must be surrounded by square brackets, with no white-space between tags (although white space within a tag is allowed). For example:

TEST_CASE("test", "[tag1][tag 2][some other tag]") {
    //             ^---- these are the tags ---^
}

Tags can be used to filter the tests, for example, by running all tests with a given tag. There are also a few "special" tags recognized by snitch, which change the behavior of the test:

• [.] is the "hidden" tag; any test with this tag will be excluded from the default list of tests. The test will only be run if selected explicitly, either when filtering by name, or by tag.
• [.<some tag>] is a shortcut for [.][<some_tag>].
• [!mayfail] indicates that the test may fail; if so, any failure will be recorded, but the test case will still be marked as passed.
• [!shouldfail] indicates that the test must fail; any failure will be recorded, but the test case will still be marked as passed. If no failure is recorded, the test is marked as failed.

Matchers in snitch work differently than in Catch2. Matchers do not need to inherit from a common base class. The only required interface is:

• matcher.match(obj) must return true if obj is a match, false otherwise.
• matcher.describe_match(obj, status) must return a value convertible to std::string_view, describing why obj is or is not a match, depending on the value of snitch::matchers::match_status.
• matcher == obj and obj == matcher must return matcher.match(obj), and matcher != obj and obj != matcher must return !matcher.match(obj); any matcher defined in the snitch::matchers namespace will have these operators defined automatically.

The following matchers are provided with snitch:

• snitch::matchers::contains_substring{"substring"}: accepts a std::string_view, and will return a match if the string contains "substring".
• snitch::matchers::with_what_contains{"substring"}: accepts a std::exception, and will return a match if what() contains "substring".
• snitch::matchers::is_any_of{T...}: accepts an object of any type T, and will return a match if it is equal to any of the T....

Here is an example matcher that, given a prefix p, checks if a string starts with the prefix "<p>:":

namespace snitch::matchers {
struct has_prefix {
    std::string_view prefix;

    bool match(std::string_view s) const noexcept {
        return s.starts_with(prefix) && s.size() >= prefix.size() + 1 && s[prefix.size()] == ':';
    }

    small_string<max_message_length>
    describe_match(std::string_view s, match_status status) const noexcept {
        small_string<max_message_length> message;
        append_or_truncate(
            message, status == match_status::matched ? "found" : "could not find", " prefix '",
            prefix, ":' in '", s, "'");

        if (status == match_status::failed) {
            if (auto pos = s.find_first_of(':'); pos != s.npos) {
                append_or_truncate(message, "; found prefix '", s.substr(0, pos), ":'");
            } else {
                append_or_truncate(message, "; no prefix found");
            }
        }

        return message;
    }
};
} // namespace snitch::matchers

snitch will always call match() before calling describe_match(). Therefore, you can save any intermediate calculation performed during match() as a member variable, to be reused later in describe_match(). This can prevent duplicating effort, and can be important if calculating the match is an expensive operation.

As in Catch2, snitch supports nesting multiple tests inside a single test case, to share set-up/tear-down logic. This is done using the SECTION("name") macro. Please see the Catch2 documentation for more details. Note: if any exception is thrown inside a section, or if a REQUIRE() check fails (or any other check which aborts execution), the whole test case is stopped. No other section will be executed.

Here is a brief example to demonstrate the flow of the test:

TEST_CASE( "test with sections", "[section]" ) {
    std::cout << "set-up" << std::endl;
    // shared set-up logic here...

    SECTION( "first section" ) {
        std::cout << " 1" << std::endl;
    }
    SECTION( "second section" ) {
        std::cout << " 2" << std::endl;
    }
    SECTION( "third section" ) {
        std::cout << " 3" << std::endl;
        SECTION( "nested section 1" ) {
            std::cout << "  3.1" << std::endl;
        }
        SECTION( "nested section 2" ) {
            std::cout << "  3.2" << std::endl;
        }
    }

    std::cout << "tear-down" << std::endl;
    // shared tear-down logic here...
}

The output of this test will be:

set-up
 1
tear-down
set-up
 2
tear-down
set-up
 3
  3.1
tear-down
set-up
 3
  3.2
tear-down

As in Catch2, snitch supports capturing contextual information to be displayed in the test failure report. This can be done with the INFO(message) and CAPTURE(vars...) macros. The captured information is "scoped", and will only be displayed for failures happening:

• after the capture, and
• in the same scope (or deeper).

For example, in the test below we compute a complicated formula in a CHECK():

#include <cmath>

TEST_CASE("test without captures", "[captures]") {
    for (std::size_t i = 0; i < 10; ++i) {
        CHECK(std::abs(std::cos(i * 3.14159 / 10)) > 0.4);
    }
}

The output of this test is:

failed: running test case "test without captures"
          at test.cpp:116
          CHECK(std::abs(std::cos(i * 3.14159 / 10)) > 0.4), got 0.309018 <= 0.400000
failed: running test case "test without captures"
          at test.cpp:116
          CHECK(std::abs(std::cos(i * 3.14159 / 10)) > 0.4), got 0.000001 <= 0.400000
failed: running test case "test without captures"
          at test.cpp:116
          CHECK(std::abs(std::cos(i * 3.14159 / 10)) > 0.4), got 0.309015 <= 0.400000

We are told the computed values that failed the check, but from just this information, it is difficult to recover the value of the loop index i which triggered the failure. To fix this, we can add CAPTURE(i) to capture the value of i:

#include <cmath>

TEST_CASE("test with captures", "[captures]") {
    for (std::size_t i = 0; i < 10; ++i) {
        CAPTURE(i);
        CHECK(std::abs(std::cos(i * 3.14159 / 10)) > 0.4);
    }
}

This new test now outputs:

failed: running test case "test with captures"
          at test.cpp:116
          with i := 4
          CHECK(std::abs(std::cos(i * 3.14159 / 10)) > 0.4), got 0.309018 <= 0.400000
failed: running test case "test with captures"
          at test.cpp:116
          with i := 5
          CHECK(std::abs(std::cos(i * 3.14159 / 10)) > 0.4), got 0.000001 <= 0.400000
failed: running test case "test with captures"
          at test.cpp:116
          with i := 6
          CHECK(std::abs(std::cos(i * 3.14159 / 10)) > 0.4), got 0.309015 <= 0.400000

For convenience, any number of variables or expressions may be captured in a single CAPTURE() call; this is equivalent to writing multiple CAPTURE() calls:

#include <cmath>

TEST_CASE("test with many captures", "[captures]") {
    for (std::size_t i = 0; i < 10; ++i) {
        CAPTURE(i, 2 * i, std::pow(i, 3.0f));
        CHECK(std::abs(std::cos(i * 3.14159 / 10)) > 0.2);
    }
}

This outputs:

failed: running test case "test with many captures"
          at test.cpp:122
          with i := 5
          with 2 * i := 10
          with std::pow(i, 3.0f) := 125.000000
          CHECK(std::abs(std::cos(i * 3.14159 / 10)) > 0.4), got 0.000001 <= 0.400000

The only requirement is that the captured variable or expression must be of a type that snitch can serialize to a string. See Custom string serialization for more information.

A more free-form way to add context to the tests is to use INFO(...). The parameters to this macro will be serialized together to form a single string, which will be appended as one capture. This can be combined with CAPTURE(). For example:

#include <cmath>

TEST_CASE("test with info", "[captures]") {
    for (std::size_t i = 0; i < 5; ++i) {
        INFO("first loop (i < 5, with i = ", i, ")");
        CAPTURE(i);
        CHECK(std::abs(std::cos(i * 3.14159 / 10)) > 0.2);
    }
    for (std::size_t i = 5; i < 10; ++i) {
        INFO("second loop (i >= 5, with i = ", i, ")");
        CAPTURE(i);
        CHECK(std::abs(std::cos(i * 3.14159 / 10)) > 0.2);
    }
}

This outputs:

failed: running test case "test with info"
          at test.cpp:123
          with second loop (i >= 5, with i = 5)
          with i := 5
          CHECK(std::abs(std::cos(i * 3.14159 / 10)) > 0.2), got 0.000001 <= 0.200000

When the snitch framework needs to serialize a value to a string, it does so with the free function append(span, value), where span is a snitch::small_string_span, and value is the value to serialize. The function must return a boolean, equal to true if the serialization was successful, or false if there was not enough room in the output string to store the complete textual representation of the value. On failure, it is recommended to write as many characters as possible, and just truncate the output; this is what built-in functions do.

Built-in serialization functions are provided for all fundamental types: integers, enums (serialized as their underlying integer type), floating point, booleans, standard string_view and char*, and raw pointers.

If you want to serialize custom types not supported out of the box by snitch, you need to provide your own append() function. This function must be placed in the same namespace as your custom type or in the snitch namespace, so it can be found by ADL (argument-dependent lookup). ADL rules can be complex to follow, so if in doubt, simply define your append() function in the snitch namespace.

In most cases, the append() function can be written in terms of serialization of fundamental types which are already supported by snitch, and therefore won't require low-level string manipulation. For example, to serialize a structure representing the 3D coordinates of a point:

namespace my_namespace {
    struct vec3d {
        float x;
        float y;
        float z;
    };

    bool append(snitch::small_string_span ss, const vec3d& v) {
        return append(ss, "{", v.x, ",", v.y, ",", v.z, "}");
    }
}

Alternatively, to serialize a class with an existing toString() member:

namespace my_namespace {
    class MyClass {
        // ...

    public:
        std::string toString() const;
    };

    bool append(snitch::small_string_span ss, const MyClass& c) {
        return append(ss, c.toString());
    }
}

If you cannot write your serialization function in this way (or for optimal speed), you will have to explicitly manage the string span. This typically involves:

• calculating the expected length n of the textual representation of your value,
• checking if n would exceed ss.available() (return false if so),
• storing the current size of the span, using old_size = ss.size(),
• growing the string span by this amount using ss.grow(n) or ss.resize(old_size + n),
• actually writing the textual representation of your value into the raw character array, accessible between ss.begin() + old_size and ss.end().

Note that snitch small strings have a fixed capacity; once this capacity is reached, the string cannot grow further, and the output must be truncated. This will normally be indicated by a ... at the end of the strings being reported (this is automatically added by snitch; you do not need to do this yourself). If this happens, depending on which string was truncated, there are a number of compilation options that can be modified to increase the maximum string length. See CMakeLists.txt, or snitch_config.hpp, or the top of snitch_all.hpp, for a complete list.

By default, snitch will report the test results to the standard output, using its own report format. There are two ways you can override this:

• Register a new reporter with REGISTER_REPORTER(...) and select it from the command-line. This is more flexible as you can change which reporter to use without re-compiling, but it requires a bit more boilerplate. See Registering a new reporter. A list of standard reporters is provided with snitch and enabled by default; see Built-in reporters.
• Override the default reporter by directly supplying your own callback function to the test registry. This is simpler but requires using your own main function, and is only a good option if the reporter never needs to change. See Overriding the default reporter.

In both cases, the core of the reporter is its "report" callback function. It is a noexcept function, taking two arguments:

• a reference to the snitch::registry that generated the event
• a reference to the snitch::event::data containing the event data. This type is a std::variant; use std::visit to act on the event.

Most events are generated during the course of a normal test run. The only exceptions are list_test_run_started, list_test_run_ended, and test_case_listed, which are generated when listing tests (--list-tests option).

When receiving a test event, the event object will only contain non-owning references (e.g., in the form of string views) to the actual event data. These references are only valid until the report function returns; after this, the event data will be destroyed or overwritten. If you need persistent access to this data (e.g., because your reporting format requires reporting the data at a different time than when the event is generated), you must explicitly copy the relevant data, and not the references. For example, for strings, this could involve creating a std::string (or snitch::small_string) from the std::string_view stored in the event object.

Finally, note that events being sent to the reporter are affected by the chosen verbosity:

• quiet: assertion_failed, test_case_skipped, list_test_run_started, list_test_run_ended, and test_case_listed only.
• normal: same as quiet, plus test_run_started and test_run_ended.
• high: same as normal, plus test_case_started and test_case_ended.
• full: same as high, plus assertion_succeeded (i.e., all events).

It may be necessary to override the default verbosity when the reporter is initialized if the reporter requires certain events to be sent.

With the default build configuration, snitch provides the following built-in reporters. They can all be disabled by turning off the CMake option SNITCH_WITH_ALL_REPORTERS or Meson option with_all_reporters, then enabled individually with specific build options if desired.

• console: This is the default reporter, always present.
• teamcity: Reports events in a format suitable for JetBrains TeamCity.
• xml: Reports events in the Catch2 XML format. Provided for compatibility with Catch2.

The default reporter callback can be registered either as a free function, a stateless lambda, or a member function. This is the reporter that is used if no --reporter option is passed to the command-line. You can register your own callback as follows:

// Free function.
// --------------
void report_function(const snitch::registry& r, const snitch::event::data& e) noexcept {
    /* ... */
}

snitch::tests.report_callback = &report_function;

// Stateless lambda (no captures).
// -------------------------------
snitch::tests.report_callback = [](const snitch::registry& r, const snitch::event::data& e) noexcept {
    /* ... */
};

// Stateful lambda (with captures).
// -------------------------------
auto lambda = [&](const snitch::registry& r, const snitch::event::data& e) noexcept {
    /* ... */
};

// 'lambda' must remain alive for the duration of the tests!
snitch::tests.report_callback = lambda;

// Member function (const or non-const, up to you).
// ------------------------------------------------
struct Reporter {
    void report(const snitch::registry& r, const snitch::event::data& e) /*const*/ noexcept {
        /* ... */
    }
};

Reporter reporter; // must remain alive for the duration of the tests!

snitch::tests.report_callback = {reporter, snitch::constant<&Reporter::report>{}};

If you need to use a reporter member function, please make sure that the reporter object remains alive for the duration of the tests (e.g., declare it static, global, or as a local variable declared in main()), or make sure to de-register it when your reporter is destroyed.

There are two macros available to register a new reporter: REGISTER_REPORTER and REGISTER_REPORTER_CALLBACKS. The former registers a reporter class or struct, and is useful for stateful reporters. The latter registers a reporter as a series of callback functions, which only need defining as needed. Both offer the same functionality, and you can simply choose the one that is most convenient for you.

REGISTER_REPORTER(NAME, TYPE);

This must be called at namespace, global, or class scope; not inside a function or another test case. This registers a new reporter with name NAME (which is used to select it from the command-line), and type TYPE. The type must define:

• A constructor taking a snitch::registry&, called when the reporter is selected.
• A bool configure(snitch::registry&, std::string_view k, std::string_view v) member function, called for each reporter option from the command-line. It is called once for each of the options provided on the command-line, with k the name of the option, and v its value. The function is expected to return false if the option was unknown, and true otherwise.
• A void report(const snitch::registry&, const snitch::event::data&) member function. It is the main report callback, and should be implemented as described in the Reporters section.

An example can be found in include/snitch_catch2_xml.hpp / src/snitch_catch2_xml.cpp.

REGISTER_REPORTER_CALLBACKS(NAME, INIT, CONFIG, REPORT, FINISH);

This is similar to REGISTER_REPORTER, but takes four separate callback functions instead of a single type as argument. The four callback functions are:

• INIT has signature void(snitch::registry& r) noexcept and is used to initialize the reporter. It is called once when the reporter is selected.
• CONFIG has signature bool(snitch::registry& r, std::string_view k, std::string_view v) noexcept and is used to configure the reporter. It is called once for each of the options provided on the command-line, with k the name of the option, and v its value. The function is expected to return false if the option was unknown, and true otherwise.
• REPORT has signature void(const snitch::registry& r, const snitch::event::data& e) noexcept. It is the main report callback, as described in Reporters.
• FINISH has signature void(snitch::registry& r) noexcept and is used to close the reporter. It is called once when the tests are finished running.

All callback functions are optional except REPORT. If a callback is unused, simply specify the function as {}. Otherwise, please refer to Overriding the default reporter for instructions on how to specify your own callback functions.

An example can be found in include/snitch_reporter_teamcity.hpp / src/snitch_reporter_teamcity.cpp.

snitch is able to use color codes when outputting text to the console. These help with readability, but only when the output is printed directly into a terminal that supports color codes. If the chosen output target does not support color codes (which includes in particular the Windows command prompt, outputting to a file, or some CI frameworks), the output will contain gibberish symbols, e.g., �[1;31merror:�[0m missing ..., hence color codes should be disabled. There are two ways to do this:

1. At build-time using -DSNITCH_DEFAULT_WITH_COLOR=on/off (CMake) or -Dsnitch:default_with_color=true/false (meson). This selects whether color codes are used or not when no specific command-line option is provided to the test executable. This is enabled by default, but you can turn it off if your typical output targets do not support color codes.
2. At run-time using the --color (or --colour-mode) command-line option (see the command-line API for more information). This allows enabling and disabling color codes for each test run, without rebuilding the tests. This is more useful if your workflow involves some targets which support color codes, and others that do not.

snitch offers the following command-line API:

• positional arguments for filtering tests by name, see next section.
• -h,--help: show command-line help.
• -l,--list-tests: list all tests.
• --list-tags: list all tags.
• --list-tests-with-tag: list all tests with a given tag.
• --list-reporters: list all registered reporters.
• -r,--reporter <reporter[::key=value]*>: choose which reporter to use to output the test events.
• -v,--verbosity <quiet|normal|high|full>: select level of detail for test events.
• -o,--output <path>: save test output to a file rather than the standard output.
• --color <always|default|never>: enable/disable colors in the default reporter.

The following options are provided for compatibility with Catch2:

• --colour-mode <ansi|default|none>: enable/disable colors in the default reporter.

The command-line arguments (other than options starting with --) are used to select which tests to run. If no positional argument is given, all test cases will be run, except those that are explicitly hidden with special tags (see Tags, and see also the note below on filtering hidden tests). Otherwise, each argument is a "filter" that is applied to the list of test cases.

A filter may contain any number of "wildcard" character, *, which can represent zero or more characters. For example:

• ab* will include all test cases with names starting with ab.
• *cd will include all test cases with names ending with cd.
• ab*cd will include all test cases with names starting with ab and ending with cd.
• abcd will only include the test case with name abcd.
• * will include all test cases.

If a filter starts with ~, the meaning of the filter is negated. For example ~ab* will include all test cases with name not starting with ab.

A filter can contain white spaces, however be mindful that your shell will require the filter to be surrounded by quotes to treat it as a single command-line argument (e.g., ./snitch_app "some test").

By default, a filter applies to the test case name (which includes the test type for templated tests, using the format name <type>). However, if a filter starts with [ or ~[, then it applies to the test case tags instead. This behavior can be bypassed by escaping the bracket \[, in which case the filter applies to the test case name again (see note below on escaping).

Finally, if multiple filters are provided, they are combined using the following logic:

• When provided as separate command-line arguments, e.g., "<filter1>" "<filter2>", the filters are combined with an "AND" operation (tests must match both filters to be selected).
• When provided as a single comma-separated command-line argument, e.g., "<filter1>,<filter2>", the filters are combined with an "OR" operation (tests must match either of the filters to be selected).
• For tag filters only, when multiple tags are specified in the same command-line argument, e.g., "[<filter1>][<filter2>]", the tag filters are combined with an "AND" operation (test tags must match both filters to be selected).

Name and tag filters can be used in any combination. To summarize, here are some examples with the equivalent C++ boolean logic (where f* represents a filter):

Note 1: To match the actual characters *, ,, [, ], or \ in a test name, the character in the filter must be escaped using a backslash, like \*. In general, any character located after a single backslash will be interpreted as a regular character, with no special meaning. Be mindful that most shells (Bash, etc.) will also require the backslash itself be escaped to be interpreted as an actual backslash in snitch. The table below shows examples of how edge-cases are handled:

Note 2: Hidden test cases are treated differently from normal test cases. For a hidden test to be run, it must be explicitly included with the chosen filters. This means that the test case a) must not have been excluded by any filter, and b) must have matched at least one non-negated filter. For example, if a hidden test is named abc, it will not be run with the filter ~b* ("all tests except those starting with b") even though its name would be a match; it was only matched "implicitly", by not being excluded. It will, however, be run with the filter a* ("all tests starting with a"), since this is an explicit match. This is somewhat subtle, but prevents more confusing results. If in doubt, hidden test cases can always be explicitly selected with the [.] filter tag, and explicitly excluded with the ~[.] filter tag.

By default snitch defines main() for you. To prevent this and provide your own main() function, when compiling snitch, SNITCH_DEFINE_MAIN must be set to 0.

If using the header-only mode, this can be done in the file that defines the snitch implementation:

#define SNITCH_IMPLEMENTATION
#define SNITCH_DEFINE_MAIN 0
#include <snitch_all.hpp>

If using CMake, this can be done by setting the option just before calling FetchContent_Declare():

set(SNITCH_DEFINE_MAIN OFF)

If using meson, then you can configure with -D snitch:define_main=false.

Here is a recommended main() function that replicates the default behavior of snitch:

int main(int argc, char* argv[]) {
    // Parse the command-line arguments.
    std::optional<snitch::cli::input> args = snitch::cli::parse_arguments(argc, argv);
    if (!args) {
        // Parsing failed, an error has been reported, just return.
        return 1;
    }

    // Configure snitch using command-line options.
    // You can then override the configuration below, or just remove this call to disable
    // command-line options entirely.
    snitch::tests.configure(*args);

    // Your own initialization code goes here.
    // ...

    // Actually run the tests.
    // This will apply any filtering specified on the command-line.
    return snitch::tests.run_tests(*args) ? 0 : 1;
}

By default, snitch assumes exceptions are enabled, and uses them in two cases:

1. Obviously, in test macros that check exceptions being thrown (e.g., REQUIRE_THROWS_AS(...)).
2. In REQUIRE*(), FAIL(), and SKIP() macros, to abort execution of the current test case and continue to the next one.

If snitch detects that exceptions are not available (or is configured with exceptions disabled, by setting SNITCH_WITH_EXCEPTIONS to 0), then

1. Test macros that check exceptions being thrown will not be defined.
2. REQUIRE*(), FAIL(), and SKIP() macros will simply use std::terminate() to abort execution. Consequently, the whole test application stops and the following test cases are not executed. If this is undesirable, use the alternative macros that do not abort execution: CHECK*(), FAIL_CHECK(), and SKIP_CHECK(), then do the control flow yourself (e.g., return from the test case).

The recommended way to use snitch is to build and consume it like any other library. This provides the best incremental build times, a standard way to include and link to the snitch implementation, and a cleaner separation between your code and snitch code, but this also requires a bit more set up (using a build generator like CMake, meson, or some other build system).

For extra convenience, snitch is also provided as a header-only library. The main header is called snitch_all.hpp, and can be downloaded as an artifact from each release on GitHub. It is also produced by any local CMake or meson build, so you can also use it like any other library.

With CMake, just link to snitch::snitch-header-only instead of snitch::snitch.

With meson, the snitch_dep dependency works for both library and header-only usage.

snitch_all.hpp is the only header required to use the library; other headers may be provided for convenience functions (e.g., reporters for common CI frameworks) and these must still be included separately.

To use snitch as header-only in your code, simply include snitch_all.hpp instead of snitch.hpp. Then, one of your files must include the snitch implementation. This can be done with a .cpp file containing only the following:

#define SNITCH_IMPLEMENTATION
#include <snitch_all.hpp>

There are no IDE integrations created specifically for snitch. However, since snitch implements most of the Catch2 command-line API, Catch2 integrations tend to work for snitch test applications as well. See in particular:

• Visual Studio Code and the C++ TestMate extension. Tested successfully on 26/08/2023.
• Visual Studio 2022 and the Catch2 Test Adapter extension. Tested successfully on 27/08/2023.
• CLion using the builtin Catch2 configuration. Tested partially on 20/08/2023 (I don't have a CLion license).

Feel free to report any issues you encounter using these IDE integrations; If you would like to contribute

With its default configuration, clang-format will incorrectly format code using SECTION() if the section is the first statement inside a test case. This is because it does not know the semantic of this macro, and by default interprets it as a declaration rather than a control statement.

Fixing this requires clang-format version 13 at least, and requires adding the following to your .clang-format file:

IfMacros: ['SECTION', 'SNITCH_SECTION']
SpaceBeforeParens: ControlStatementsExceptControlMacros

Please refer to the separate contributing page.

Please refer to the separate code of conduct page.

Libraries and programs sometimes do shady or downright illegal stuff (i.e., bugs, crashes). snitch is a library like any other; it may have its own bugs and faults. But it's a snitch! It will tell you when other libraries and programs misbehave, with the hope that you will overlook its own wrongdoings.

The logo is a jay feather. Jays are known for alerting other animals of danger.