You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Following development of the c-cote library, I notice that the Publisher is always a "server", which means it is binding a socket, while the Subscriber is always a "client", connecting to discovered server.
I think user can benefit of the opposite too: a Subscriber "server", binding a socket and waiting for Publisher "clients" to send data.
Is it something that was studied ? wanted maybe by other people ?
This can be the beginning of a discussion on the subject if you want. This is still something handle by Axon but just need to be used in cote if we want it.
Joel
PS : I though about Requester and Responder but not sure it is a real use case to have Requester binding a socket and Responder connecting to clients...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello @dashersw
Following development of the c-cote library, I notice that the Publisher is always a "server", which means it is binding a socket, while the Subscriber is always a "client", connecting to discovered server.
I think user can benefit of the opposite too: a Subscriber "server", binding a socket and waiting for Publisher "clients" to send data.
Is it something that was studied ? wanted maybe by other people ?
This can be the beginning of a discussion on the subject if you want. This is still something handle by Axon but just need to be used in cote if we want it.
Joel
PS : I though about Requester and Responder but not sure it is a real use case to have Requester binding a socket and Responder connecting to clients...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: