Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
There are several reasons we have used the "Object" type in our annotations in the past:
configure()
Reason 1 may have to stick around. I'm not sure yet.
Reason 2 is no longer valid, and these should be converted to Maps or Sets.
Reason 3 was never valid, and this especially needs to be fixed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There are several reasons we have used the "Object" type in our annotations in the past:
configure()
Reason 1 may have to stick around. I'm not sure yet.
Reason 2 is no longer valid, and these should be converted to Maps or Sets.
Reason 3 was never valid, and this especially needs to be fixed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: