You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The syntax for nth pseudo class selectors currently use a simplified syntax which later references actual types in the prose. It would be simpler and better for tooling which parses this data to use the actual types.
For example: :nth-child(An+B [of S]? )
Would be represented as: :nth-child(<an-b> [of <complex-real-selector-list>]? )
If this is acceptable I'd be happy to supply a patch.
The syntax for nth pseudo class selectors currently use a simplified syntax which later references actual types in the prose. It would be simpler and better for tooling which parses this data to use the actual types.
For example:
:nth-child(An+B [of S]? )
Would be represented as:
:nth-child(<an-b> [of <complex-real-selector-list>]? )
If this is acceptable I'd be happy to supply a patch.
See also #9473.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: