Supported Architectures

dpro...@gmail.com

unread,

Feb 6, 2024, 11:13:15 AMFeb 6

to Knative Users

Hey everyone,

I'm curious if anyone has tried running Knative OSS on architectures that are not amd64/arm64? If so can you reply to this thread and mention which arch you are using.

For context we have some s390x/ppc tests upstream that aren't really being monitored so we're thinking of dropping them (https://github.com/knative/infra/issues/344). If we drop these jobs then it might also make sense to drop building s390x/ppc arch controllers.

I'm curious what other architectures people are using.

thanks,

dave protasowski

knative technical oversight committee

Dilip Bhagavan

unread,

Feb 7, 2024, 8:46:20 AMFeb 7

to Knative Users

Hi Dave, me along with my colleague Valen as part of enabling OpenShift Serverless for s390x and ppc64le architectures are actively working on knative upstream release to keep them updated. Please do not drop these jobs, this will impact our openshift serverless integrations.

With recent release of 1.13, we had conflicts with cron schedule that caused main and 1.13 branch related jobs failing. We are also observing some flakiness in serving kourier and serving contour tests, we are trying to debug them. They are bit tricky since jobs are passing alternatively and we are trying look further on why it's happening. If we want to have further discussions let us know.

Regards,

Dilip

Rishika Kedia

unread,

Feb 7, 2024, 8:46:29 AMFeb 7

to Knative Users

We as part of enabling OpenShift Serverless for s390x and ppc64le architectures are actively working on knative upstream release to keep them updated. The members here working actively are @dilipgb (for s390x) and @valen-mascarenhas14 (for pp64le).

With respect to istio envoy images - we leverage maistra/envoy packages (midstream of istio envoy packages) for testing knative functionalities. There is active work happening on maintaining maistra/envoy for s390x and ppc64le architectures.

On Tuesday 6 February 2024 at 21:43:15 UTC+5:30 dpro...@gmail.com wrote:

Reply all

Reply to author

Forward