Timeline for We're switching to CommonMark
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
14 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nov 9, 2021 at 16:21 | history | edited | bad_coder | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Ease of reading edit. Stylized tech name.
|
Sep 24, 2021 at 0:44 | comment | added | pkamb | another: meta.stackoverflow.com/posts/254472/revisions | |
Sep 1, 2020 at 17:57 | comment | added | pkamb | @HamVocke FYI: added a bad/weird block quote edit that I found on Stack Overflow. | |
Sep 1, 2020 at 17:54 | history | edited | pkamb | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
found one that happened on Stack Overflow... plus revert back to the actual [sic] edit comment on the edits.
|
Jun 9, 2020 at 10:20 | history | edited | This_is_NOT_a_forum | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Active reading [<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Markdown#CommonMark>].
|
Jun 8, 2020 at 8:42 | history | edited | Ham VockeStaffMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 1 character in body
|
Jun 4, 2020 at 15:43 | comment | added | tkruse | It might be a good idea to also run a commonmark linter on the transformed results. A linter might be able to warn in cases the generated commonmark is legal, but weird. | |
Jun 4, 2020 at 9:48 | comment | added | PM 2Ring | @HamVocke Ah, I see. The new version looks the same as the previous version, and the HTML is the same. It's only the Markdown that has extra indentation. | |
Jun 4, 2020 at 9:39 | comment | added | Ham Vocke StaffMod | @PM2Ring I understand where your concern is coming from but that statement still holds true. "Looks different" refers to the rendered HTML, not the Markdown version of a post. In the cases outline here the Markdown was changed but still resulted in equal HTML (because CommonMark allows some ambiguity). | |
Jun 4, 2020 at 9:37 | comment | added | PM 2Ring | @HamVocke It's great that you've fixed this bug, but it is a bit concerning that the autofixer let that edit go through. That doesn't appear to be consistent with: "If a post looks different using the new renderer (and if it’s just one whitespace off) we won’t automatically re-render the post and put it up for investigation first." | |
Jun 4, 2020 at 8:09 | history | edited | Ham VockeStaffMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 24 characters in body
|
Jun 4, 2020 at 8:07 | comment | added | Ham Vocke StaffMod | Wow, awesome find! Turns out there's a bug in the markdown autofixer: When a line preceding a blockquote contains a hyphen, a subsequent blockquote will be indented. I've got a repro and will fix this now so we don't run into this for upcoming migrations. In those two cases, feel free to edit the markdown manually. | |
Jun 3, 2020 at 21:13 | history | edited | pkamb | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 147 characters in body
|
Jun 3, 2020 at 20:56 | history | answered | pkamb | CC BY-SA 4.0 |