User talk:NonvocalScream

Just to let you know, Chris G's bot won't revert you if you have more than 50 edits on here. Cheers, Razorflame 00:42, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I was looking for the revert, could not find it. o.O Thanks, NonvocalScream (talk) 00:42, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I also was looking for the revert so that I could revert it for you, unfortunately, I, too, came to the same conclusion as I could not find it. Cheers, Razorflame 00:44, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It seems like Chris G's bot likes you ;). Razorflame 04:17, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It would appear so. :) NonvocalScream (talk) 04:18, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello NonvocalScream. We have come to a conclusion after dicussing the way points should be counted. You must make a page were you keep record of your edits. It should look like this and it should be called user:NonvocalScream/Wikicup Edit Count. It will be checked by our judges to make sure there is no cheating. If we find that there was a very large margin of error, you will be disqualified. Remember, any edit which does not figure on this page will not be counted in your final score. Thank you for your attention.

Yotbot (talk) 23:20, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I already started that discussion here.-- CM16 ^M_LB  08:37, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Just be sure to never remove any comment I make and we should be good, I'll change/alter/remove my comments as needed. But do continue to let me know like you just did, my comment needed altering, but not removing. Very best! NonvocalScream (talk) 08:42, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article was changed to only facts and it now sound less than a resume... what are the chances you can read it and see if you can change you vote. ThanksTwin Cities Facts (talk) 20:03, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I will take another look soon. NonvocalScream (talk) 20:04, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I can't remember if I looked at this, I'll look now. NonvocalScream (talk) 02:51, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On 4 January, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Capillary, to which you substantially contributed. If you know of another interesting fact from an article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

That's one... — RyanCross (talk) 09:17, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On 4 January, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Phosgene, to which you substantially contributed. If you know of another interesting fact from an article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

And that's the other. Thank you for your contributions. — RyanCross (talk) 09:21, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I'll move these over to my trinkets place. :) NonvocalScream (talk) 02:51, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

bugzilla:16871

I've put a list up on my area on the Toolserver of all the pages that have got links pointing to them. Look at the bug report for more details. :-) :-) Stwalkerster talk 17:47, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for this query. I've been needing it as part of my formulae, in order to help me budget time to which articles need creating first. Triage :) Best, NonvocalScream (talk) 02:51, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinately for this! :) Kennedy ^(talk) 20:05, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Someone didn't read...*cocks shotgun*....ROFL-- CM16 ^M_LB  20:10, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I did not think anyone would notice. Very best! NonvocalScream (talk) 02:51, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry, I figured someone would do that ;) Kennedy ^(talk) 08:58, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have written an apology for enWP here that I intend to present to the enWP community somehow and I would like some constructive criticism please. Please read the "letter" and comment on the "letter" here. Thank you.-- CM16 ^M_LB  07:27, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On Simple? NonvocalScream (talk) 11:18, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Where else do you want me to do it?-- CM16 ^M_LB  22:03, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have closed the RFD as withdrawn. 1) I did so assuming you will "transfer more information with regards to notability, should be easy enough." 2) It's good to meet you. ;) TheAE talk 01:42, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nice to meet you as well. What articles do you prefer, maybe I can help. I write them all, except I won't write on one subject. Incidentally, I'll be finishing the Christianity series here over the next few days. Best, NonvocalScream (talk) 01:45, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going to patronize you with templated vandalism warnings, but please do not create pages where they are not wanted. If I want a redirect or anything on my user page, I will do it myself. Right now, I'm perfectly fine with leaving it as a redlink. Should I find a need or desire to create a "blue link" (or if someone can give me rationale explanations as to why I should have a blue link other than "it's odd to look at," "I'm sick of looking at it," or "it's not the norm"), I will. Thank you, Either way (talk) 01:26, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You got it. Sorry. Very best, NonvocalScream (talk) 01:35, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello NonvocalScream. You may stop updating your wikicup edit count (unless told otherwise by a judge) as it will be done by a judge from now on. Thank you, Yotbot (talk) 21:52, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]