1917

I have a constructor function which registers an event handler:

function MyConstructor(data, transport) {
    this.data = data;
    transport.on('data', function () {
        alert(this.data);
    });
}

// Mock transport object
var transport = {
    on: function(event, callback) {
        setTimeout(callback, 1000);
    }
};

// called as
var obj = new MyConstructor('foo', transport);

However, I'm not able to access the data property of the created object inside the callback. It looks like this does not refer to the object that was created, but to another one.

I also tried to use an object method instead of an anonymous function:

function MyConstructor(data, transport) {
    this.data = data;
    transport.on('data', this.alert);
}

MyConstructor.prototype.alert = function() {
    alert(this.name);
};

but it exhibits the same problems.

How can I access the correct object?

4

16 Answers 16

2308

What you should know about this

this (aka "the context") is a special keyword inside each function and its value only depends on how the function was called, not how/when/where it was defined. It is not affected by lexical scopes like other variables (except for arrow functions, see below). Here are some examples:

function foo() {
    console.log(this);
}

// normal function call
foo(); // `this` will refer to `window`

// as object method
var obj = {bar: foo};
obj.bar(); // `this` will refer to `obj`

// as constructor function
new foo(); // `this` will refer to an object that inherits from `foo.prototype`

To learn more about this, have a look at the MDN documentation.


How to refer to the correct this

Use arrow functions

ECMAScript 6 introduced arrow functions, which can be thought of as lambda functions. They don't have their own this binding. Instead, this is looked up in scope just like a normal variable. That means you don't have to call .bind. That's not the only special behavior they have, please refer to the MDN documentation for more information.

function MyConstructor(data, transport) {
    this.data = data;
    transport.on('data', () => alert(this.data));
}

Don't use this

You actually don't want to access this in particular, but the object it refers to. That's why an easy solution is to simply create a new variable that also refers to that object. The variable can have any name, but common ones are self and that.

function MyConstructor(data, transport) {
    this.data = data;
    var self = this;
    transport.on('data', function() {
        alert(self.data);
    });
}

Since self is a normal variable, it obeys lexical scope rules and is accessible inside the callback. This also has the advantage that you can access the this value of the callback itself.

Explicitly set this of the callback - part 1

It might look like you have no control over the value of this because its value is set automatically, but that is actually not the case.

Every function has the method .bind [docs], which returns a new function with this bound to a value. The function has exactly the same behavior as the one you called .bind on, only that this was set by you. No matter how or when that function is called, this will always refer to the passed value.

function MyConstructor(data, transport) {
    this.data = data;
    var boundFunction = (function() { // parenthesis are not necessary
        alert(this.data);             // but might improve readability
    }).bind(this); // <- here we are calling `.bind()` 
    transport.on('data', boundFunction);
}

In this case, we are binding the callback's this to the value of MyConstructor's this.

Note: When a binding context for jQuery, use jQuery.proxy [docs] instead. The reason to do this is so that you don't need to store the reference to the function when unbinding an event callback. jQuery handles that internally.

Set this of the callback - part 2

Some functions/methods which accept callbacks also accept a value to which the callback's this should refer to. This is basically the same as binding it yourself, but the function/method does it for you. Array#map [docs] is such a method. Its signature is:

array.map(callback[, thisArg])

The first argument is the callback and the second argument is the value this should refer to. Here is a contrived example:

var arr = [1, 2, 3];
var obj = {multiplier: 42};

var new_arr = arr.map(function(v) {
    return v * this.multiplier;
}, obj); // <- here we are passing `obj` as second argument

Note: Whether or not you can pass a value for this is usually mentioned in the documentation of that function/method. For example, jQuery's $.ajax method [docs] describes an option called context:

This object will be made the context of all Ajax-related callbacks.


Common problem: Using object methods as callbacks/event handlers

Another common manifestation of this problem is when an object method is used as callback/event handler. Functions are first-class citizens in JavaScript and the term "method" is just a colloquial term for a function that is a value of an object property. But that function doesn't have a specific link to its "containing" object.

Consider the following example:

function Foo() {
    this.data = 42,
    document.body.onclick = this.method;
}

Foo.prototype.method = function() {
    console.log(this.data);
};

The function this.method is assigned as click event handler, but if the document.body is clicked, the value logged will be undefined, because inside the event handler, this refers to the document.body, not the instance of Foo.
As already mentioned at the beginning, what this refers to depends on how the function is called, not how it is defined.
If the code was like the following, it might be more obvious that the function doesn't have an implicit reference to the object:

function method() {
    console.log(this.data);
}


function Foo() {
    this.data = 42,
    document.body.onclick = this.method;
}

Foo.prototype.method = method;

The solution is the same as mentioned above: If available, use .bind to explicitly bind this to a specific value

document.body.onclick = this.method.bind(this);

or explicitly call the function as a "method" of the object, by using an anonymous function as callback / event handler and assign the object (this) to another variable:

var self = this;
document.body.onclick = function() {
    self.method();
};

or use an arrow function:

document.body.onclick = () => this.method();
4
  • 52
    Felix, I've read to this answer before but never replied. I grow concerned that people use self and that to refer to this. I feel this way because this is an overloaded variable used in different contexts; whereas self usually corresponds to the local instance and that usually refers to another object. I know you did not set this rule, as I've seen it appear in a number of other places, but it is also why I've started to use _this, but am not sure how others feel, except for the non-uniform practice that has resulted.
    – vol7ron
    Commented Sep 12, 2014 at 15:39
  • @FelixKling, it allows you to be super lazy with code like $(...).on('click', $.proxy(obj, 'function')) and $(...).off('click', obj.function).
    – zzzzBov
    Commented Mar 19, 2015 at 15:51
  • 6
    @FelixKling It can be useful at times to rely on Function.prototype.call () and Function.prototype.apply (). Particularly with apply () I've gotten a lot of mileage. I am less inclined to use bind () perhaps only out of habit though I am aware ( but not certain ) that there may be slight overhead advantages to using bind over the other options.
    – Nolo
    Commented Nov 15, 2016 at 6:02
  • 3
    It's important to note that bind() will take a snapshot of the context where it's first encountered during interpretation... That is to say, when JavaScript gets to the bind() function for the first time, it will take the context for this at that point! This can become tricky to troubleshoot, as the standard implementation of bind() CANNOT be altered. Once a function has been bound to another object, it will remain bound to that object, and attempting to rebind it won't work.
    – Jack_Hu
    Commented Jun 7, 2022 at 12:34
273

Here are several ways to access the parent context inside a child context -

  1. You can use the bind() function.
  2. Store a reference to context/this inside another variable (see the below example).
  3. Use ES6 Arrow functions.
  4. Alter the code, function design, and architecture - for this you should have command over design patterns in JavaScript.

1. Use the bind() function

function MyConstructor(data, transport) {
    this.data = data;
    transport.on('data', ( function () {
        alert(this.data);
    }).bind(this) );
}
// Mock transport object
var transport = {
    on: function(event, callback) {
        setTimeout(callback, 1000);
    }
};
// called as
var obj = new MyConstructor('foo', transport);

If you are using Underscore.js - http://underscorejs.org/#bind

transport.on('data', _.bind(function () {
    alert(this.data);
}, this));

2. Store a reference to context/this inside another variable

function MyConstructor(data, transport) {
  var self = this;
  this.data = data;
  transport.on('data', function() {
    alert(self.data);
  });
}

3. Arrow function

function MyConstructor(data, transport) {
  this.data = data;
  transport.on('data', () => {
    alert(this.data);
  });
}
2
  • 1
    The bind() option is amazing its just passing the pointer of this Object to be the this on the other object (: Thanks !
    – Stav Bodik
    Commented Mar 13, 2019 at 11:31
  • "…parent context inside child context" is a misleading phrase as this is not part of a parent/child relationship. It often refers to the object a method was called on, but can be any object, or any value in strict mode. "Context" refers to an execution context (of which this is one parameter of many) which can't be referenced because ECMA-262 forbids it.
    – RobG
    Commented Mar 29, 2021 at 9:23
74

It's all in the "magic" syntax of calling a method:

object.property();

When you get the property from the object and call it in one go, the object will be the context for the method. If you call the same method, but in separate steps, the context is the global scope (window) instead:

var f = object.property;
f();

When you get the reference of a method, it's no longer attached to the object. It's just a reference to a plain function. The same happens when you get the reference to use as a callback:

this.saveNextLevelData(this.setAll);

That's where you would bind the context to the function:

this.saveNextLevelData(this.setAll.bind(this));

If you are using jQuery you should use the $.proxy method instead, as bind is not supported in all browsers:

this.saveNextLevelData($.proxy(this.setAll, this));
60

You should know about "this" Keyword.

As per my view you can implement "this" in three ways (Self|Arrow function|Bind Method)

A function's this keyword behaves a little differently in JavaScript compared to other languages.

It also has some differences between strict mode and non-strict mode.

In most cases, the value of this is determined by how a function is called.

It can't be set by assignment during execution, and it may be different each time the function is called.

ES5 introduced the bind() method to set the value of a function's this regardless of how it's called,

And ES2015 introduced arrow functions that don't provide their own this binding (it retains this value of the enclosing lexical context).

Method1: Self - Self is being used to maintain a reference to the original this even as the context is changing. It's a technique often used in event handlers (especially in closures).

Reference: this

function MyConstructor(data, transport) {
    this.data = data;
    var self = this;
    transport.on('data', function () {
        alert(self.data);
    });
}

Method2: Arrow function - An arrow function expression is a syntactically compact alternative to a regular function expression, although without its own bindings to the this, arguments, super, or new.target keywords.

Arrow function expressions are ill-suited as methods, and they cannot be used as constructors.

Reference: Arrow function expressions

  function MyConstructor(data, transport) {
    this.data = data;
    transport.on('data',()=> {
        alert(this.data);
    });
}

Method 3: Bind - The bind() method creates a new function that, when called, has its this keyword set to the provided value with a given sequence of arguments preceding any provided when the new function is called.

Reference: Function.prototype.bind()

  function MyConstructor(data, transport) {
    this.data = data;
    transport.on('data',(function() {
        alert(this.data);
    }).bind(this);
38

The trouble with "context"

The term "context" is sometimes used to refer to the object referenced by this. Its use is inappropriate, because it doesn't fit either semantically or technically with ECMAScript's this.

"Context" means the circumstances surrounding something that adds meaning, or some preceding and following information that gives extra meaning. The term "context" is used in ECMAScript to refer to execution context, which is all the parameters, scope, and this within the scope of some executing code.

This is shown in ECMA-262 section 10.4.2:

Set the ThisBinding to the same value as the ThisBinding of the calling execution context

Which clearly indicates that this is part of an execution context.

An execution context provides the surrounding information that adds meaning to the code that is being executed. It includes much more information than just the thisBinding.

The value of this isn't "context". It's just one part of an execution context. It's essentially a local variable that can be set by the call to any object and in strict mode, to any value at all.

4
  • Can't agree with this answer. The existence of the term "execution context" does not outlaw other uses of "context" any more than it outlaws other uses of "execution". Maybe there is a better term to describe this but none is offered here, and it's arguably too late to shut the door on "context". Commented Jun 8, 2019 at 15:12
  • @Roamer-1888—thank you for the edit. You're right, but my argument doesn't rely on the existence of "execution context" precluding the of "context" for some other purpose. Rather, it's based on "context" being inappropriate from both a technical and semantic perspective. I also think the use of "context" instead of "this" is dying out. I don't see any reason to find an alternative term to this or thisBinding, it just obfuscates and means at some point you have to explain that "context" is actually this, and that it isn't in anyway "context". :-)
    – RobG
    Commented Jun 8, 2019 at 23:42
  • I don't think you can say that this isn't in any way "context", when you have already admittted that it's one part of an execution context, where "execution" is merely adjectival. Commented Jun 9, 2019 at 2:16
  • @Roamer-1888—I'm not going to continue this conversation past this point. Yes, this is part of an execution context. Saying it's the context is like saying one player of a team is the team.
    – RobG
    Commented Jun 9, 2019 at 3:06
30

First, you need to have a clear understanding of scope and behaviour of the this keyword in the context of scope.

this & scope:


There are two types of scope in JavaScript. They are:

  1. Global Scope

  2. Function Scope

In short, global scope refers to the window object. Variables declared in a global scope are accessible from anywhere.

On the other hand, function scope resides inside of a function. A variable declared inside a function cannot be accessed from the outside world normally.

The this keyword in the global scope refers to the window object. this inside a function also refers to the window object. So this will always refer to the window until we find a way to manipulate this to indicate a context of our own choosing.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-                                                                              -
-   Global Scope                                                               -
-   (globally "this" refers to window object)                                  -
-                                                                              -
-   function outer_function(callback){                                         -
-                                                                              -
-       // Outer function scope                                                -
-       // Inside the outer function, the "this" keyword                       -
-       //  refers to window object                                            -
-       callback() // "this" inside callback also refers to the  window object -
-   }                                                                          -
-                                                                              -
-   function callback_function(){                                              -
-                                                                              -
-       // Function to be passed as callback                                   -
-                                                                              -
-       // Here "THIS" refers to the window object also                        -
-   }                                                                          -
-                                                                              -
-   outer_function(callback_function)                                          -
-   // Invoke with callback                                                    -
-                                                                              -
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Different ways to manipulate this inside callback functions:

Here I have a constructor function called Person. It has a property called name and four method called sayNameVersion1, sayNameVersion2, sayNameVersion3, and sayNameVersion4. All four of them has one specific task. Accept a callback and invoke it. The callback has a specific task which is to log the name property of an instance of Person constructor function.

function Person(name){

    this.name = name

    this.sayNameVersion1 = function(callback){
        callback.bind(this)()
    }
    this.sayNameVersion2 = function(callback){
        callback()
    }

    this.sayNameVersion3 = function(callback){
        callback.call(this)
    }

    this.sayNameVersion4 = function(callback){
        callback.apply(this)
    }

}

function niceCallback(){

    // Function to be used as callback

    var parentObject = this

    console.log(parentObject)
}

Now let's create an instance from person constructor and invoke different versions of sayNameVersionX (X refers to 1,2,3,4) method with niceCallback to see how many ways we can manipulate the this inside callback to refer to the person instance.

var p1 = new Person('zami') // Create an instance of Person constructor

bind:

What bind do is to create a new function with the this keyword set to the provided value.

sayNameVersion1 and sayNameVersion2 use bind to manipulate this of the callback function.

this.sayNameVersion1 = function(callback){
    callback.bind(this)()
}
this.sayNameVersion2 = function(callback){
    callback()
}

The first one binds this with a callback inside the method itself. And for the second one, the callback is passed with the object bound to it.

p1.sayNameVersion1(niceCallback) // pass simply the callback and bind happens inside the sayNameVersion1 method

p1.sayNameVersion2(niceCallback.bind(p1)) // uses bind before passing callback

call:

The first argument of the call method is used as this inside the function that is invoked with call attached to it.

sayNameVersion3 uses call to manipulate the this to refer to the person object that we created, instead of the window object.

this.sayNameVersion3 = function(callback){
    callback.call(this)
}

And it is called like the following:

p1.sayNameVersion3(niceCallback)

apply:

Similar to call, the first argument of apply refers to the object that will be indicated by the this keyword.

sayNameVersion4 uses apply to manipulate this to refer to a person object

this.sayNameVersion4 = function(callback){
    callback.apply(this)
}

And it is called like the following. Simply the callback is passed,

p1.sayNameVersion4(niceCallback)
3
  • 1
    any constructive criticism regarding the answer will be appreciated !
    – AL-zami
    Commented Aug 19, 2017 at 8:55
  • 1
    The this keyword in the global scope doesn't necessarily refer to the window object. That is true only in a browser. Commented May 23, 2018 at 10:04
  • 1
    @RandallFlagg i wrote this answer from a browser's perspective.Fell free to inhance this answer if necessary :)
    – AL-zami
    Commented Jul 9, 2018 at 0:14
24

We can not bind this to setTimeout(), as it always executes with the global object (Window). If you want to access the this context in the callback function then by using bind() to the callback function, we can achieve it as:

setTimeout(function(){
    this.methodName();
}.bind(this), 2000);
1
  • Re "Window": Isn't it "window" (lowercase)? Commented Jul 25, 2021 at 20:46
14

The question revolves around how the this keyword behaves in JavaScript. this behaves differently as below,

  1. The value of this is usually determined by a function execution context.
  2. In the global scope, this refers to the global object (the window object).
  3. If strict mode is enabled for any function then the value of this will be undefined as in strict mode, global object refers to undefined in place of the window object.
  4. The object that is standing before the dot is what the this keyword will be bound to.
  5. We can set the value of this explicitly with call(), bind(), and apply()
  6. When the new keyword is used (a constructor), this is bound to the new object being created.
  7. Arrow functions don’t bind this — instead, this is bound lexically (i.e., based on the original context)

As most of the answers suggest, we can use the arrow function or bind() Method or Self var. I would quote a point about lambdas (arrow function) from Google JavaScript Style Guide

Prefer using arrow functions over f.bind(this), and especially over goog.bind(f, this). Avoid writing const self = this. Arrow functions are particularly useful for callbacks, which sometimes pass unexpectedly additional arguments.

Google clearly recommends using lambdas rather than bind or const self = this

So the best solution would be to use lambdas as below,

function MyConstructor(data, transport) {
  this.data = data;
  transport.on('data', () => {
    alert(this.data);
  });
}

References:

  1. https://medium.com/tech-tajawal/javascript-this-4-rules-7354abdb274c
  2. arrow-functions-vs-bind
2
9

Currently there is another approach possible if classes are used in code.

With support of class fields, it's possible to make it the following way:

class someView {
    onSomeInputKeyUp = (event) => {
        console.log(this); // This refers to the correct value
    // ....
    someInitMethod() {
        //...
        someInput.addEventListener('input', this.onSomeInputKeyUp)

For sure under the hood it's all the old good arrow function that binds context, but in this form it looks much more clear that explicit binding.

Since it's a Stage 3 Proposal, you will need Babel and appropriate Babel plugin to process it as for now (08/2018).

1
  • 2
    This is exactly the way I got it working in Typescript: public methodName = (params) => { body } inside a class.
    – yeyeyerman
    Commented Feb 17, 2019 at 17:36
5

Another approach, which is the standard way since DOM2 to bind this within the event listener, that let you always remove the listener (among other benefits), is the handleEvent(evt) method from the EventListener interface:

var obj = {
  handleEvent(e) {
    // always true
    console.log(this === obj);
  }
};

document.body.addEventListener('click', obj);

Detailed information about using handleEvent can be found here: DOM handleEvent: a cross-platform standard since year 2000

1
  • I like this a lot. first place I've seen this. thanks for pointing this out.
    – kdubs
    Commented Apr 6, 2023 at 2:19
5

I was facing a problem with Ngx line chart xAxisTickFormatting function which was called from HTML like this: [xAxisTickFormatting]="xFormat".

I was unable to access my component's variable from the function declared. This solution helped me to resolve the issue to find the correct this.

Instead of using the function like this:

xFormat (value): string {
  return value.toString() + this.oneComponentVariable; //gives wrong result
}

Use this:

 xFormat = (value) => {
   // console.log(this);
   // now you have access to your component variables
   return value + this.oneComponentVariable
 }
5

this in JavaScript:

The value of this in JavaScript is 100% determined by how a function is called, and not how it is defined. We can relatively easily find the value of this by the 'left of the dot rule':

  1. When the function is created using the function keyword the value of this is the object left of the dot of the function which is called
  2. If there is no object left of the dot then the value of this inside a function is often the global object (global in Node.js and window in a browser). I wouldn't recommend using the this keyword here because it is less explicit than using something like window!
  3. There exist certain constructs like arrow functions and functions created using the Function.prototype.bind() a function that can fix the value of this. These are exceptions of the rule, but they are really helpful to fix the value of this.

Example in Node.js

module.exports.data = 'module data';
// This outside a function in node refers to module.exports object
console.log(this);

const obj1 = {
    data: "obj1 data",
    met1: function () {
        console.log(this.data);
    },
    met2: () => {
        console.log(this.data);
    },
};

const obj2 = {
    data: "obj2 data",
    test1: function () {
        console.log(this.data);
    },
    test2: function () {
        console.log(this.data);
    }.bind(obj1),
    test3: obj1.met1,
    test4: obj1.met2,
};

obj2.test1();
obj2.test2();
obj2.test3();
obj2.test4();
obj1.met1.call(obj2);

Output:

Enter image description here

Let me walk you through the outputs one by one (ignoring the first log starting from the second):

  1. this is obj2 because of the left of the dot rule, we can see how test1 is called obj2.test1();. obj2 is left of the dot and thus the this value.
  2. Even though obj2 is left of the dot, test2 is bound to obj1 via the bind() method. The this value is obj1.
  3. obj2 is left of the dot from the function which is called: obj2.test3(). Therefore obj2 will be the value of this.
  4. In this case: obj2.test4() obj2 is left of the dot. However, arrow functions don't have their own this binding. Therefore it will bind to the this value of the outer scope which is the module.exports an object which was logged in the beginning.
  5. We can also specify the value of this by using the call function. Here we can pass in the desired this value as an argument, which is obj2 in this case.
4

Some other people have touched on how to use the .bind() method, but specifically here is how you can use it with .then() if anyone is having trouble getting them to work together:

someFunction()
.then(function(response) {
    //'this' wasn't accessible here before but now it is
}.bind(this))

As mentioned in the comments, an alternative would be to use an arrow function that doesn't have its own 'this' value

someFunction()
.then((response)=>{
    //'this' was always accessible here
})
2
  • That's not correct. (1) arrow functions don't have their own this value and use the value from the closes this-providing environment. (2) because of that, .bind doesn't have an affect on arrow functions. Commented Jun 24, 2021 at 22:58
  • good call, I copied the code wrong, updated to show both variations
    – Josh McGee
    Commented Jun 24, 2021 at 23:03
4

You can use arrow function to avoid the issue with this .

const functionToTest = (dataToSet , transport) => {
  this.dataToSet = dataToSet ;
  transport.on('dataToSet ', () => {
    console.log(this.dataToSet);
  });
}
0

Anser for year 2024

A lot of information here is quite obsolete. This answer is focused on how to resolve in 2024+

  1. Use instances when calling function
  • never take function "out of its instance". If you need to call that function later, just keep the whole instance, for example like this:

class A {
  constructor(id) {
    this.id = id;
  }

  someFunction(){
    console.log(this);
  }
}

const a1 = new A(5);
const a2 = new A(20);
const arr = [a1, a2];

// some business logic

arr.forEach(a => a.someFunction());

  1. Do not overuse this

Do not use this and classes if not necessary. When you require files like repositories, controllers, services, it by default creates singletons, which is something you want (its basically like @Autowired in Java, but native). And singletons do not require classes and "this", whatever you need to define, define on the root of the file. Then just export functions/variables you want. If you dont use this, you cannot have problem with this.

For example somethingService.js can look similar to the code below:

const someDefaultValue = 10;

export function doSomething() {
   console.log(someDefaultValue);
}

Then you dont have to think about using doSomething() as somethingService.doSomething() or doSomething() directly. (it will work the same)

  1. Use apply/call/bind

I am personally not fan of using apply (or call or bind which is basically the same, just called a bit differently) extensively, from my experience it can bring even more chaos into code. But there can be situations where you might need it, so I will list it here. You can basically "inject" this with whatever object you like inside function.

    class Simple { 
      constructor(id) {
        this.id = id;
      }

      showThis(text) {
        console.log(this, ` ** ${text} **`)
      }
    }
    
    
const simple = new Simple(25);
const showThisFn = simple.showThis;
showThisFn("using it without apply");
showThisFn.apply(simple, ["using it with apply"])
showThisFn.call(simple, "using it with call - basically same as apply, only syntactic sugar difference today")
boundShowThisFn = showThisFn.bind(simple);
boundShowThisFn("now it is bound with the function, so you dont have to specify it when calling it");

  1. Use Arrow Function => correctly

If you have function inside function and you use this, the arrow function will pass the this context in the way you would expect. Using function keyword will change the context of this.

(basically use arrow functions whenever it is possible and you are safe)

class A {
  constructor(baseValue) {
    this.baseValue = baseValue;
  }

  doMathArrowFunction(arr){
    arr.forEach(item => {
      console.log(`Arrow function: item is ${item} and this?.baseValue is ${this?.baseValue}`);
      console.log(item + this?.baseValue);
    });
  }
      

  doMathOldWay(arr) {
    arr.forEach(function(item) {
      console.log(`Old fashion function: item is ${item} and this?.baseValue is ${this?.baseValue}`);
      console.log(item + this?.baseValue);
    });
  }
}
 

const x = [1,2];
const a = new A(10);
a.doMathArrowFunction(x);
a.doMathOldWay(x);

In past (before Arrow function existed) it was often resolved with self/that keywords. If you encounter it and want to know more - check accepted answer in this thread.

-1

This is how I solved the problem

class myClass
{
    constructor(parent)
    {
        this.callback = (function() { 
            this.callbackFunctionOfParent();             
        }).bind(parent);
    }

    callCallback() {
         this.callback();
    }
}

class Class2
{
       constructor()
       {
            this.Name = "CLASS 2";

            this.test = new myClass(this);

            this.test.callCallback();
       } 

       callbackFunctionOfParent()
       {
           console.log("parent is: " + this.Name);
       }
}

var c2 = new Class2;

4
  • 1
    This is unnecessarily complicated. At the very least you could write this.callback = function() { parent.callbackFunctionOfParent() } but I'm sure this could be simplified a lot more depending on what you are actually trying to achieve. Commented May 10, 2023 at 15:53
  • The question was about accessing 'this' in the context of the derived class, not what is the simplest way to call a function on the parent class. Commented May 11, 2023 at 18:33
  • 1
    But why would you present a solution that is more difficult to understand? Solutions should be reduced to the absolute minimum so that they are easy to understand. According to your argument I could provide the following solution to the question "how to add two numbers" and it would be ok? function mul(x, y) { return x * y; } function add(x, y) { return mul(x, 1) + mul(y, 1); }; add(41, 1) Commented May 12, 2023 at 11:36
  • I think you are free to edit the post and make it more terse, if it is still understandable and gives the same result on "run code snippet", then I have no problem with this. Commented May 15, 2023 at 15:50

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.