View source for Talk:Guided bus

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:

This IP address has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.
This does not affect your ability to read Wikipedia pages.
Most people who see this message have done nothing wrong. Some kinds of blocks restrict editing from specific service providers or telecom companies in response to recent abuse or vandalism, and can sometimes affect other users who are unrelated to that abuse. Review the information below for assistance if you do not believe that you have done anything wrong.

The IP address or range 3.91.0.0/16 has been blocked by ‪L235‬ for the following reason(s):

The IP address that you are currently using has been blocked because it is believed to be a web host provider or colocation provider. To prevent abuse, web hosts and colocation providers may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
You will not be able to edit Wikipedia using a web host or colocation provider because it hides your IP address, much like a proxy or VPN.
We recommend that you attempt to use another connection to edit. For example, if you use a proxy or VPN to connect to the internet, turn it off when editing Wikipedia. If you edit using a mobile connection, try using a Wi-Fi connection, and vice versa. If you are using a corporate internet connection, switch to a different Wi-Fi network. If you have a Wikipedia account, please log in.
If you do not have any other way to edit Wikipedia, you will need to request an IP block exemption.

How to appeal if you are confident that your connection does not use a colocation provider's IP address:
If you are confident that you are not using a web host, you may appeal this block by adding the following text on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Caught by a colocation web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is _______. Place any further information here. ~~~~}}. You must fill in the blank with your IP address for this block to be investigated. Your IP address can be determined here. Alternatively, if you wish to keep your IP address private you can use the unblock ticket request system. There are several reasons you might be editing using the IP address of a web host or colocation provider (such as if you are using VPN software or a business network); please use this method of appeal only if you think your IP address is in fact not a web host or colocation provider.

Administrators: The IP block exemption user right should only be applied to allow users to edit using web host in exceptional circumstances, and requests should usually be directed to the functionaries team via email. If you intend to give the IPBE user right, a CheckUser needs to take a look at the account. This can be requested most easily at SPI Quick Checkuser Requests. Unblocking an IP or IP range with this template is highly discouraged without at least contacting the blocking administrator.

This block will expire on 21:36, 3 July 2026. Your current IP address is 3.91.60.153.

Even when blocked, you will usually still be able to edit your user talk page, as well as email administrators and other editors.

For information on how to proceed, please read the FAQ for blocked users and the guideline on block appeals. The guide to appealing blocks may also be helpful.

Other useful links: Blocking policy · Help:I have been blocked
This IP address range has been globally blocked.
This does not affect your ability to read Wikipedia pages.
Most people who see this message have done nothing wrong. Some kinds of blocks restrict editing from specific service providers or telecom companies in response to recent abuse or vandalism, and can sometimes affect other users who are unrelated to that abuse. Review the information below for assistance if you do not believe that you have done anything wrong.

This block affects editing on all Wikimedia wikis.
The IP address or range 3.91.0.0/16 has been globally blocked by ‪Jon Kolbert‬ for the following reason(s):

Open proxy/Webhost: See the help page if you are affected

This block will expire on 01:29, 13 May 2029. Your current IP address is 3.91.60.153.

Even while globally blocked, you will usually still be able to edit pages on Meta-Wiki.

If you believe you were blocked by mistake, you can find additional information and instructions in the No open proxies global policy. Otherwise, to discuss the block please post a request for review on Meta-Wiki. You could also send an email to the stewards VRT queue at stewards@wikimedia.org including all above details.

Other useful links: Global blocks · Help:I have been blocked

You can view and copy the source of this page:

{{British English Oxford spelling}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|
{{WikiProject Buses|importance=top}}
}}

==mergewith BRT==
Merging with BRT has been suggested, but I do not find any discussion on it here....

'''Against''' merging. ''Guided bus'' or ''Guided busway'' is a technology, ''Bus rapid transit'' is a systematic approach for a faster (bus-based) public transport system. -- [[User:Klaus with K|Klaus with K]] 14:15, 4 August 2005 (UTC)

:I agree, but some cross-reference is required.  guided buses are always part of a BRT system?

::[part of BRT]? Yes and No. As a consequence of the BRT definition, first answer yes, as a guided bus lane cannot be sensibly used by unguided vehicles and thus provides an exclusive right-of-way. Second answer is no, as at least here in Edinburgh the FASTLINK GUIDED BUSWAY is considered to be part of a transport system that does not limit itself to buses only. Then I feel that BRT is US-speak 
== as here in the UK I still have to come across the expression ''Bus Rapid Transit'' despite my interest in ''Public Transport''. 
::* The articles already contain cross-references 
::* in Mannheim (Germany) guided bus and tram share ROW [[:de:Image:Spurbus Mannheim1.jpg]]
::* is there an expression ''Rail Rapid Transit''? 
::-- [[User:Klaus with K|Klaus with K]] 11:30, 5 August 2005 (UTC)

Since no one has written in support, I'm removing the move tag; bus rapid transit is not inherently guided, nor are guided buses inherently part of the bus rapid transit philosophy. The two should certainly reference each other, but are distinct topics. (Klaus with K: 'rapid transit' usually implies railways unless otherwise stated; it's more or less a U.S. equivalent of 'metro' and the like.) [[User:DavidArthur|David Arthur]] 01:23, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

==Problem with reference link==
{{
cite news
|url=http://lrta.info/news/news0244.html
|publisher=LRTA
|title=Further problems in Nancy
|date=November 20, 2002 
}}{{dead}}

For some reason or another, the above reference does not open up at all. Peter Horn 00:41, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

{{done}} website had moved to http://www.lrta.org/news/02/news0244.html [[User:Martin of Sheffield|Martin of Sheffield]] ([[User talk:Martin of Sheffield|talk]]) 16:25, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

==rubber wheeled trams==
Should the rubber wheeled trams resided at tram/streetcar/light rail?
Rubber-wheeled metro/subway resides at subway/metro.

== Advantages? ==

This Article doesn't really address what advantages (if any) that a guided bus system has over a normal "busses only" lane.  Is it faster? Safer? Cheaper?

:Valid questions, but please sign your writing here with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> --[[User:Klaus with K|Klaus with K]] 17:39, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

::I have only traveled on the Edinburgh System. It travels at 30mph (compaired with 40mph the busses travel at on a non-guided section). The main advantage is the ability to restrict users of the guideway (a bus only road could be used by any bus, while the guideway is resticted to approved busses). The other advantage is the track can be narrower than an equivelant road (since the vehicles do not move off the set path).[[User:Msmh|Msmh]] 16:25, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

In my opinion there is no significant advantage, that's why they are rare. A normal bus road can be quite narrow according to my experience, and bus and tram can be combined by having normal street tram rails. The ability to restrict non-approved buses, small advantage. To restrict private cars, have a device that makes it impossible to pass if the distance between left and right wheels is too small, relatively common.
The normal advantage of trams over buses is that trams can be longer since they are guided, but then they have to be guided all the route. Another big advantage is that tram have electric propulsion, but also, they have to be guided all the route. The disadvantage of guided bus routes is that it is expensive to build and requires special buses, which costs more money to buy. This is my assessment, please comment. -- [[User:BIL|BIL]] 09:27, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

:Compared to "[[Transit bus|traditional buses]]" that operate on [[Road|roads]] in [[traffic congestion]], guided buses provide a clearly superior service as they have the advantages of [[Bus Rapid Transit]] (as they are a form of BRT).  It is my observation that guided busways are rare because they are more expensive than unguided dedicated busways but do not give many special advantages (as you have outlined).  Therefore they are only implemented in special circumstances, the main one being a restricted route corridor.  I am not familiar with French Guided Busway Systems like [[Bombardier_Guided_Light_Transit|Bombardier]] or [[Translohr]] that appear to be more focussed on provided "rubber tire trams", but most English based systems like the [[Crawley Fastway|Fastway]], the [[Cambridgeshire Guided Busway]] (currently being built) and [[O-Bahn Busway|the O-Bahn]] use guided buses as some or all of the corridor is too narrow for an unguided busway.  Your comments about the trams are correct, but all three of the previous guided busway systems do have significant advantages over trams to provide the equivelant service being: mixing unguided and guided busway such as Fastway (cheaper while still able to use a 1.5Km narrow corridor section); mixed road and railway corridor routes as at Cambridgeshire and a route that is too steep for light rail as in the O-Bahn.  Also, all the guided busways have the BRT advantage of seamless service because the buses can enter and leave the busway at both ends and, if required, the middle . . . a benefit used in all three systems.  [[User:Bigglesjames|Bigglesjames]] 00:41, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

I too would like to hear about the advantages/disadvantages of the "guided bus" system. It seems halfway between [[bus]] and [[tram]] although I don't clearly see why you wouldn't simply install a tram service if you needed some dedicated line to be built...? Some of the comments above (e.g. by Bigglesjames) are helpful, but it'd be great to get some nicely-sourced information in the article please. --[[User:Mcld|mcld]] ([[User talk:Mcld|talk]]) 10:37, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

:The principal argument for a guided bus over a regular busway is that like a tram, it doesn't need to be steered. It can pass closer to an obstacle, or to an oncoming vehicle, than a steered bus could safely do, and so the right-of-way needn't be as wide. It also has the feeling of greater permanence, though that gets very subjective.
:In many cases, construction costs are very similar to a tram, so the main argument for guided buses is their ability to leave the guideway and operate independently. In some cases, guideway is installed for only part of the route (as in Nancy); in others, they leave the guideway only when travelling to/from a bus depot (as in Caen) or when the regular route is blocked. Their rubber tyres also give them greater hill-climbing ability than trams. [[User:DavidArthur|David Arthur]] ([[User talk:DavidArthur|talk]]) 15:18, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
::I would doubt construction costs are similar, a guided bus doesn't need overhead wires for a start. [[User:MickMacNee|MickMacNee]] ([[User talk:MickMacNee|talk]]) 16:43, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
:::I was thinking more of the GLT/Translohr -style vehicles used in France, which do use overhead wires as well as a central guide rail, and cost about the same as a tramway. The kind that use guidewheels on a regular bus, as has been popular in Britain, is naturally less expensive, though the busways are still substantially more complicated than an ordinary bus-only road. [[User:DavidArthur|David Arthur]] ([[User talk:DavidArthur|talk]]) 19:29, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

A section about alleged advantages (with references) is still needed.--[[User:Pere prlpz|Pere prlpz]] ([[User talk:Pere prlpz|talk]]) 10:51, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

: the section on kerb-guided systems already states " Both the Cambridgeshire and Leigh-Salford-Manchester schemes have reported greatly increased levels of patronage (both on the buses themselves and the adjacent paths), high levels of modal transfer of travellers from private car use, and high levels of passenger satisfaction". Plus references.  Isn't that enough? [[User:TomHennell|TomHennell]] ([[User talk:TomHennell|talk]]) 13:02, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

::The 2006 BRT report (External links) discusses advantages.  I don't have time at the moment to distil it - perhaps one of you could? [[User:Martin of Sheffield|Martin of Sheffield]] ([[User talk:Martin of Sheffield|talk]]) 17:31, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

::: A bit old though; and does not pick up on the more recent schemes - Cambridgeshire, Luton-Dunstable, Leigh-Manchester. [[User:TomHennell|TomHennell]] ([[User talk:TomHennell|talk]]) 17:56, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

== Add Essen Bus Tunnel Info ? ==
The following  information has been removed from [[Bus Rapid Transit]] as it is too  specific to be relevent.  However, I think this information should  remain inside Wikipedia.  [[Essen]] buses do not have their own article.  They are still an important early example of both Guided buses and  [[Dual-mode bus]]es and so I suggest adding this information to this  article.

::''Between 1988 and 1995 dual mode buses provided a shared  service with the  steel wheel streetcars / trams through part of the  light rail tunnel  system in the German city of [[Essen]]. Whilst underground the buses   fully interacted with the railway-style signalling system. Initially  they  called at just one underground station but after the 1991 opening  of a  tunnel extension they started calling at an additional two   subterranean stations. The new stations featured island platforms for   which the buses were equipped with two sets of passenger doors on their   otherside. For safety the buses in [[Essen]] also used the [[guided bus]] system so  that whilst travelling  through the narrow tunnels the bus driver did not  need to steer the  vehicle. Although the bus driver will normally sell  tickets to boarding  passengers who need them, when calling at the  underground stations the  off-vehicle  ticketing system was enforced, with  passengers needing to purchase  their tickets before descending to the  platforms.''

Comments Please [[User:Bigglesjames|Bigglesjames]] ([[User talk:Bigglesjames|talk]]) 22:21, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

:It sounds like as a rather unusual set-up it could sustain its own article. It could then just be mentioned in a sentence in here, and linked from Essen too. There are plenty of German users who could probably help with that, and there might be more info on the German wikipedia. Without a standalone article, I would say the detailed info belongs in a section in Essen, again just linked in a sentence or two from here using #section linking. [[User:MickMacNee|MickMacNee]] ([[User talk:MickMacNee|talk]]) 19:27, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

The article about Essen would be an appropriate place for a short section about the city's guided bus system. I suggest placing it as a subsection of ''Infrastructure'' just below the ''Public Transport'' subsection. With more material, the Essen guided bus system would make a suitable standalone article, with links to Guided bus and Essen. You can, of course, add a subsection to Essen now, then move it to a standalone article later. [[User:Folklore1|Folklore1]] ([[User talk:Folklore1|talk]]) 19:39, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

== why would someone build this? ==

I don't get it. If it needs a driver to enter and exit the system, then why not just have a driver the whole time? <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:108.132.92.8|108.132.92.8]] ([[User talk:108.132.92.8|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/108.132.92.8|contribs]]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->
:Why try to steer throughout a curb system when you can simply have guide wheels to do the steering for you? That's the point-- it's a ''track''. <span style='color:black'><span style="font-family:helterskelter;">Swarm</span></span> <sup>[[user:Swarm|<span style='color: black;'>u</span>]] | [[user talk:Swarm|<span style='color: black;'>t</span>]]</sup> 18:56, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

== Guidance systems ==

If you move the optical and magnetic guidance systems down to L2 under "Guidance systems", should not GLT and Translohr also be there, as indeed should KGB.  Perhaps moving the specific implementations out of the guidance systems into the examples section would help, something like:
* History
* Guidance systems ''Restrict to technical details''
** KGB
** GLT
** Translohr
** Optical
** Magnetic
* Examples ''Include existing examples in the appropriate sub-heading''
** KGB ''Cambridge and Nagoya''
** GLT ''Nancy and Caen''
** Translohr ''Padua, L'Aquila, Venice''
** Optical ''Seimens''
** Magnetic ''Eindhoven etc''
* See Also
* References
* External links
Moving the detailed examples out of the technical description and merging with the existing list might make it easier for a reader to understand the core concepts. [[User:Martin of Sheffield|Martin of Sheffield]] ([[User talk:Martin of Sheffield|talk]]) 10:26, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
: I agree in principle with the above.  Guided Buses are really a special subset of BRT where the differentiating factor is the use of a guidance system.  I would suggest that the examples be a sub-heading of the main Guidance Systems section.  You could also separately describe mechanical systems (i.e. kerb and rail) from non-mechanical.  There are some general differences in the cost, impact on road use, maturity and operational risk profile between the use of mechanical vs non-mechanical systems [[User:Bigglesjames|Bigglesjames]] ([[User talk:Bigglesjames|talk]]) 00:00, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
::Possibly put general details in a section between History and Guidance systems? [[User:Martin of Sheffield|Martin of Sheffield]] ([[User talk:Martin of Sheffield|talk]]) 10:30, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

== There is no evidence to prove the superiority of a defunct and a thriving guidance system? PC maxxed out? ==

> There is no evidence to prove the superiority of either guidance system. Both Bombardier and Translohr have had derailments during operation.

Huh? The Bombardier system is now abandoned, because its single roller just couldn't keep constant grab of the guidance rail. Furthermore, the weight of Bombardier guided buses is supported to a large percentage by the rail roller, in a futile effort to forcibly keep it in constant contact with the monorail. This makes the causeway foundations crack prematurely. Existing lines will be converted back to traditonal articulated busses when major overhaul period of the rolling stock arrives, Bombardier itself has stated that. It's game over<ref>{{cite news |url= http://www.railwaygazette.com/news/single-view/view/guided-bus-to-tram-plan-confirmed.html |title=Guided bus to tram plan confirmed |newspaper=[[Railway Gazette International]] |publisher= |date=5 February 2016 |accessdate=}}</ref>.

In constrast, the Alstom Translohr LTE system is now celebrating carnival, most literally. Its Tranvia di Mestre system has reached Venezia (Venice) proper as of 15 Sep 2015, offering direct transfer to water buses or black gondolas, depending on the rider's wallet and romantic inclinations. The Veneto LTE monorail network is now 20km long (laid out in the shape of an anchor) and one day may be connected with nearby Padua's similiar system. (The venetian LTE "torpedos" are painted deep red, while the patavian ones are sky blue.) Although an extension to Marco Polo int'l airport is the mid-term aim of venetian Translohr expansion. [[Special:Contributions/82.131.153.119|82.131.153.119]] ([[User talk:82.131.153.119|talk]]) 21:17, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
:[[TEDA Modern Guided Rail Tram|This article]] shows that [[Translohr]] is on a roll. [[User:Peter Horn|Peter Horn]] [[User talk:Peter Horn|User talk]] 16:38, 20 July 2016 (UTC) 
::Continue on [[Talk:Rubber-tyred trams#Discussion]]. [[User:Peter Horn|Peter Horn]] [[User talk:Peter Horn|User talk]] 15:09, 21 July 2016 (UTC) 
::Perhaps I am naive for expecting a transit system with significant capital costs to last more than 16 years... [[User:AsimovtheCat|AsimovtheCat]] ([[User talk:AsimovtheCat|talk]]) 03:12, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
=== References ===
{{Reflist}}

== Split of the section [[Guided bus#Rubber-tired "trams" (trolleybuses)|Rubber-tired "trams"]] ==
{{archivetop}}
For it is a specific class of guided "bus" that is not technically designed to be a "guided" bus. See [[fr:Tramway sur pneumatiques]]. [[User:Some Gadget Geek|&#60;&#60;&#60; SOME GADGET GEEK &#62;&#62;&#62;]] ([[User talk:Some Gadget Geek|talk]]) 00:00, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

'''Oppose'''  The "rubber tyred" trams presented here are not trams, they are guided buses.  Both the Bombardier and the Translohr use a guide rail, not a running rail so are not trams.  They are not trolley buses either, since trolley buses are not guided and many modern ones are not even tied permanently to the overhead.  I might support a renaming of the section to "Rail guided buses" or similar. [[User:Martin of Sheffield|Martin of Sheffield]] ([[User talk:Martin of Sheffield|talk]]) 08:30, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
:Renaming this section would be OK as long as the redirect [[Guided bus#Rubber-tired "trams" (trolleybuses)|Rubber-tyred tram]] in [[Trolleybus#see also]] is adjusted accordingly. [[User:Peter Horn|Peter Horn]] [[User talk:Peter Horn|User talk]] 16:13, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
::And the redirect page [[Rubber-tyred trams]] would also need to be adjusted. [[User:Peter Horn|Peter Horn]] [[User talk:Peter Horn|User talk]] 17:26, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
:::6 pages now link to the redirect page [[Rubber-tyred trams]] and none, except this talk page, to [[Rubber-tyred tram]]. [[User:Peter Horn|Peter Horn]] [[User talk:Peter Horn|User talk]] 18:47, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
::::I found anothe redirect page [[Rubber tired tram]] with links. [[User:Peter Horn|Peter Horn]] [[User talk:Peter Horn|User talk]] 19:17, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
:::::Peter, are you in agreement or opposed to [[user:Some Gadget Geek]]'s suggestion about a split?  The naming is a minor side issue. [[User:Martin of Sheffield|Martin of Sheffield]] ([[User talk:Martin of Sheffield|talk]]) 23:05, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
::::::You will notice that I have  copied and pasted the entire text of the section to [[rubber-tyred trams]] thereby effectively causing the split. Fait accompli. [[User:Peter Horn|Peter Horn]] [[User talk:Peter Horn|User talk]] 14:38, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
:::::::''Merci beaucoup!'' [[User:Some Gadget Geek|&#60;&#60;&#60; SOME GADGET GEEK &#62;&#62;&#62;]] ([[User talk:Some Gadget Geek|talk]]) 01:38, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
{{archivebottom}}

== Crawley Fastway ==

I have removed references to [[Crawley Fastway]], and put [[Leigh-Salford-Manchester Bus Rapid Transit]] references in their place.  In my view, the LSM busway provides a better illustration of the potential advantages of kerb-guided busway features; and it allows us to use more informative pictures. [[User:TomHennell|TomHennell]] ([[User talk:TomHennell|talk]]) 11:29, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

== External links modified ==

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on [[Guided bus]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=806958983 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090416144840/http://www.cambridgeshire.gov.uk/transport/guided/ to http://www.cambridgeshire.gov.uk/transport/guided/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060522234251/http://www.lohr.fr/transport-public.htm to http://www.lohr.fr/transport-public.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060717000611/http://www.bombardier.com/en/1_0/1_2/1_2_2_2_1.jsp to http://www.bombardier.com/en/1_0/1_2/1_2_2_2_1.jsp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090416144840/http://www.cambridgeshire.gov.uk/transport/guided/ to http://www.cambridgeshire.gov.uk/transport/guided/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}

Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 03:28, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Pages transcluded onto the current version of this page (help):

Guided bus (edit)
Template:- (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Archive bottom (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Archive top (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Archive top/styles.css (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Archivebottom (view source) (protected)
Template:Archivetop (view source) (protected)
Template:British English (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:British English Oxford spelling (view source) (semi-protected)
Template:Category handler (view source) (protected)
Template:Cite news (view source) (protected)
Template:Clear (view source) (protected)
Template:Dead (view source) (semi-protected)
Template:Dead link (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Done (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Fix (view source) (protected)
Template:Fix/category (view source) (protected)
Template:Ifsubst (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Main other (view source) (protected)
Template:Para (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Portal (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Reflist (view source) (protected)
Template:Reflist/styles.css (view source) (protected)
Template:Source check (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Sourcecheck (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Template link expanded (view source) (protected)
Template:Tlx (view source) (protected)
Template:WikiProject Buses (view source) (semi-protected)
Template:WikiProject banner shell (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Arguments (view source) (protected)
Module:Banner shell (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Banner shell/config (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Banner shell/styles.css (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Category handler (view source) (protected)
Module:Category handler/blacklist (view source) (protected)
Module:Category handler/config (view source) (protected)
Module:Category handler/data (view source) (protected)
Module:Category handler/shared (view source) (protected)
Module:Check for unknown parameters (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1 (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/COinS (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/Date validation (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/Utilities (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/Whitelist (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css (view source) (protected)
Module:Disambiguation/templates (view source) (protected)
Module:English variant notice (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Message box (view source) (protected)
Module:Message box/configuration (view source) (protected)
Module:Message box/tmbox.css (view source) (protected)
Module:Namespace detect/config (view source) (protected)
Module:Namespace detect/data (view source) (protected)
Module:Pagetype (view source) (protected)
Module:Pagetype/config (view source) (protected)
Module:Pagetype/disambiguation (view source) (protected)
Module:Pagetype/rfd (view source) (protected)
Module:Pagetype/setindex (view source) (protected)
Module:Pagetype/softredirect (view source) (protected)
Module:Portal (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Portal/images/b (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Portal/styles.css (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Template link general (view source) (protected)
Module:Template parameter value (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Template wrapper (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Unsubst (view source) (protected)
Module:WikiProject banner (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:WikiProject banner/config (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:WikiProject banner/styles.css (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Wikitext Parsing (view source) (protected)
Module:Yesno (view source) (protected)

Return to Talk:Guided bus.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Guided_bus"