User talk:Quondum: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Johnjbarton (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
:Sorry, I apologize. I did not mean to bug you. I was just asking on the noticeboard for suggestions. [[User:Johnjbarton|Johnjbarton]] ([[User talk:Johnjbarton|talk]]) 06:22, 4 November 2024 (UTC) |
:Sorry, I apologize. I did not mean to bug you. I was just asking on the noticeboard for suggestions. [[User:Johnjbarton|Johnjbarton]] ([[User talk:Johnjbarton|talk]]) 06:22, 4 November 2024 (UTC) |
||
:: Thanks for the consideration. I have been watching ''[[Double-slit experiment]]'' so am aware of this anyway, and have not been encouraged by the continued obstinacy. Maybe there is a lesson for me in this: that [[Special:Diff/1018108306|grumpiness]] can make one blind to social cues that would lead to better outcomes. —[[User_talk:Quondum|Quondum]] 13:21, 4 November 2024 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 13:21, 4 November 2024
This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion
[edit]This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "Double-slit experiment".
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!
TheWikiToby (talk) 05:08, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, I apologize. I did not mean to bug you. I was just asking on the noticeboard for suggestions. Johnjbarton (talk) 06:22, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the consideration. I have been watching Double-slit experiment so am aware of this anyway, and have not been encouraged by the continued obstinacy. Maybe there is a lesson for me in this: that grumpiness can make one blind to social cues that would lead to better outcomes. —Quondum 13:21, 4 November 2024 (UTC)