User talk:Victor9876: Difference between revisions

Fresh Start

Your actions are being discussed at ANI. Cheers. Weakopedia (talk) 09:38, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked this account for IP socking, and disruptive editing. The IP sock edits are the ones I have recently blanked from several pages. See also Talk:Houston McCoy. Jehochman ^Talk 13:08, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Whoa! IP socking, I haven't been IP socking, show them! Victor9876 (talk) 23:17, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

When a true genius appears in this world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him.

Jonathan Swift, Thoughts on Various Subjects Victor9876 (talk) 06:05, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It should be noted that Jimbo Wales, referenced the message below prior to the actions that got me blocked - and now banned. This violates WP policy, moral and ethical issues as well as legal issues. The community should be ashamed of this man, and his violations of his own rules. He has the same message here with a suggestion of a complete ban, which has happened.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Houston_McCoy

It should be noted that this editor is John Moore, who has been disruptive at Wikipedia for many years. See User:Subwayjack. He sent me a highly insulting email this morning, speaking of "that piece of shit hero McCoy", ranting angrily against Mr. McCoy's daughter, lobbying personal insults at me and other editors at Wikipedia, etc. Mr. Moore's role in the life story of John McCoy is not notable, but Moore has a POV-pushing agenda to take public credit for various things. In my view, it is all a sad and personal story between these folks, and it deserves no place in Wikipedia.--Jimbo Wales (talk) 12:37, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the problem Mr. Wales:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Memorex3300

You talk about me having an agenda! All McCoy above and here for a short time! Victor9876 (talk) 19:22, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just so you know, nobody is probably reading this page. If you would to request to be unblocked, you need to use template:unblock. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 05:33, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well Ricky81682, why would I post an unblock tag after Jimbo "suggested" this to you:

"Ricky81682, take note that Victor9876 is John Moore, who has a long history of being disruptive about this entry. He has a personal relationship to the topic, and a personal agenda to see that his own (in my view, non-notable) role in Mr. McCoy's life be incorporated into the article. (Hence his desire to upload personal legal documents pertaining to that relationship.) Mr. Moore sent me a highly insulting email this morning, speaking of "that piece of shit hero McCoy", angrily ranting against Mr. McCoy's daughter (insinuating that she's behind my efforts here, which is patently untrue, I have had no contact with her since she complained to me about Moore years ago), etc. He is currently blocked for disruptive editing, and in his email to me requested a permanent ban. I'm leaving it alone, but based on his history of sockpuppeting, his disruptiveness here, his clear WP:COI editing - I think an indef block would not be unwarranted.--Jimbo Wales (talk) 12:44, 15 June 2010 (UTC)"

So you can have the satisfaction of saying NO! NO, I won't do it. Jimbo complains that I uploaded personal documents for various reasons, yet I never got a thank you for uploading my pictures on the McCoy page and the Charles Whitman page. Jimbo is right, just because I got McCoy his diagnosis, Social Security, and the Texas Workman's Compensation Award and my name is in the articles that reference it on the McCoy and Whitman pages, what gives me the right to think I'm notable enough to have my name mentioned for such dastardly deeds? I'm selfish and should contribute all my money for the fine abuse I go through on these pages. Victor9876 (talk) 06:40, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just an FYI, but your ability to still edit this page is based on the assumption you're actually interested in being unblocked and allowed to resume editing here. Continued sniping is inappropriate, and I've noted that here. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 08:01, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As you mention above Ricky81682, nobody, which you are, is probably looking at this page, except you. Why do you continue to return and police my page, interpret something as sniping and run off to register a complaint on the admin board? It's because the power you have as an admin has gone to your head and that makes you a danger to the community, WP:WPNC. FYI! Victor9876 (talk) 15:09, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've asked here and I generally give some leeway for complaints after being blocked, but he may be going a bit far. Following Jimbo's remarks, I'd block email as well if I were you. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 08:04, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive551#My_User_Talk_Page_being_compromised

This ban is similar to the previous attempt above. Assertions were made that I had committed deeds as a sockpuppet and for malicious means. After a thourough exam of the history, it was the accuser who had started the issues, accused others who were known editors of being my sockpuppets and the IP addresses were from various areas of the US and Canada. The user Carrt81, even received admonishments from users he accused of being sockpuppets of mine. I wonder who Memorex3300 is a sockpuppet of?! Victor9876 (talk) 21:34, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]