User talk:IceWelder: Difference between revisions

Archives

Archive 1 — 2015 Archive 2 — 2016 Archive 3 — 2017 Archive 4 — 2018 Archive 5 — 2019 Archive 6 — 2020

Just following up on your edit at the GTA V characters list where you removed a small bit of information about Michal Sinnott's role as Tracey. Although it wasn't cited to an RS, it's an interview with the actor. Would we not be giving attribution to her instead of the site? If the AfD closes as delete, I would consider if it's worth adding to the development article. What are your thoughts? (pinging Rhain). — CR4ZE (T • C) 05:15, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@CR4ZE: I don't think it should be included, for two reasons: Firstly, the site seems (or rather seemed, since it is now dead) rather sketchy and shouldn't be used in an FA, even if the content in it is modeled like an interview. Second, the claim is that Sinnott worked on the game for three years. If I got my maths right, and shooting began in 2010 while the game released in 2013, this would be true for every actor who didn't just voice a pedestrian. The claim is really peripheral and IMO does not warrant inclusion just because others didn't say the same verbatim. In contrast, the claims made by Mogentale for Ron go beyond that. Cutting down some of the stuff that counted for all actors, his claims might warrant inclusion, although it would seem a bit odd to thoroughly cover the three protagonists, and then suddenly have one sentence about a random supporting character. Regards, IceWelder [✉] 07:58, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You make a fair point about Sinnott. I was looking further into Mogentale's sentiments and I think they're interesting and could be included. Though you're right, it has to be integrated in a way that doesn't feel phoned-in when the article's so heavy on analysis of the lead protagonists. I'm going to look into inserting some of that information back in a way this organic. Feel free to throw around ideas if you have any. Thanks for your feedback. — CR4ZE (T • C) 13:50, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Iron Galaxy Studios.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. HapHaxion _{(talk / contribs)} 16:26, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

BMG Entertainment (and its video game publishing division, BMG Interactive) were both subsidiaries of Bertelsmann Music Group (formerly RCA/Ariola International), and not directly subsidiaries of Bertelsmann in any way. All sources that hint that BMG Entertainment is a subsidiary of Bertelsmann is wrong. So BMG Interactive has to be a subsidiary of the German music publisher. Yes. I'm talking about both Rockstar Games and Take Two Interactive. --Jostcom (talk) 17:17, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This was already discussed previously with plenty of sources various publications and various years. If you can provide at least a few reliable sources to the table that explicity verify your claim, be my guest. That the company begins in "BMG" is not a source, for that matter. IceWelder [✉] 17:22, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I will have to speak to Bertelsmann to make your claims false and prove that BMG Interactive (and BMG Entertainment) were both subsidiaries of Bertelsmann Music Group.--Jostcom (talk) 17:33, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. I'm still not sure whether we really need this claim, but make sure they publish that info clearly on their website to make it verfiable. IceWelder [✉] 17:39, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mojang Studios you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of OceanHok -- OceanHok (talk) 16:41, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Heya! Sorry for the delayed response. Here's the page you requested: https://drive.google.com/file/d/16_2xvXIJJTMwOSU43ePj1onnqXwj-AyV/view?usp=sharing. Let me know if you need anything else. Cheers! sesuprime 21:22, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]