Talk:List of stars in Andromeda
Astronomy: Astronomical objects List‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||||||
|
Wider Table
We should make the star table wider by adding more data into it in every opened articles in the list of stars by constellations and make it like the other web sites, such as star catalogues, right ascension, declination, absolute magnitude and spectral type. Currently, the table only contain Bayer designations, Flamsteed designations for some constellations, star name icons and proper names, apparent magnitudes, distance, comments, and sometimes right ascension and declination before aparent magnitude, distance, but after the names/designations. The figure of table from left to right is shown here:
Name | Designation | Location | Magnitude | Distance | Sp. class | Notes | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | F | HD | HIP | RA | Dec | vis. | abs. | Ly | Pc |
Thank you alot for making the new table style in the list of star by constellation articles, from Fornax to Lyra as of 23:45 UTC, December 26, 2006, but you should add one more thing, "distance in parsec". For more information about the distance, look in Talk:List of stars in Lyra and Talk:List of stars in Vulpecula. Cosmium 00:34, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for the thanks. I was pondering if I should add also distance in parsecs. But since parsecs are not much used in popular texts (incl. Wikipedia), and since the parsecs column doesn't add much new information (just the same values of light year distance divided by 3.26), I didn't see any compelling reason why parsec distances should be included. Keeping the tables as light as possible is in my opinion more important. I included the absolute magnitude since it tells how bright the star actually is and computing it is more complex operation (although some Hipparcos distances are quite meaningless because of small parallaxes). Anyway, after I've incorporated the star notes into my database, updating the tables should be considerably easier.--JyriL talk 13:43, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Etymologies
Etymologies listed in this table don't fit into the new table, so please add them in respective star articles with sources.--JyriL talk 16:54, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- I think they're all in. Might want to delete some of the rarer alternates in e.g. Mirach. kwami 18:05, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
BD | F | Names and other designations | Mag. | Ly away | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
α | 21 | Alpha Andromedae, Alpheratz, Alpherat, Al'faret, Al'ferats, Sirrah, Sirah, Sirrakh | 2.06 | 97.1 |
|
β | 43 | Beta Andromedae, Mirach, Merach, Mirac, Mirak, Mirakh, Merak, Mirar, Mirath, Mirax, El Mizar, Al Mizar | 2.07 | 199 |
|
γ¹,² | 57 | Gamma Andromedae, Almach, Almaak, Alamak, Almak, Almaach, Alamac, Al'mak | 2.26 | 355 |
|
δ | 31 | Delta Andromedae, Sadiradra, Saderazra, Sadir Elazra | 3.27 | 101 |
|
51 | 51 Andromedae, Anfal, El Enfal | 3.59 | 174 |
| |
ο | 1 | Omicron Andromedae | 3.62 | 692 | |
λ | 16 | Lambda Andromedae | 3.81 | 84.2 | |
μ | 37 | Mu Andromedae | 3.86 | 136 | |
ζ | 34 | Zeta Andromedae | 4.08 | 181 | |
υ | 50 | Upsilon Andromedae, Adhab, Azab | 4.09 | 43.9 |
|
κ | 19 | Kappa Andromedae | 4.15 | 170 | |
φ | 42 | Phi Andromedae, Keun Nan Mun | 4.26 | 740 |
|
ι | 17 | Iota Andromedae | 4.29 | 503 | |
ε | 30 | Epsilon Andromedae | 4.34 | 169 | |
π | 29 | Pi Andromedae | 4.34 | 660 | |
η | 34 | Eta Andromedae | 4.40 | 243 | |
σ | 25 | Sigma Andromedae | 4.51 | 141 | |
ν | 35 | Nu Andromedae | 4.53 | 680 | |
7 | 7 Andromedae | 4.53 | 63.6... | ||
θ | 24 | Theta Andromedae | 4.61 | 253 | |
3 | 3 Andromedae | 4.64 | 927 | ||
65 | 65 Andromedae | 4.73 | 307 | ||
58 | 58 Andromedae | 4.78 | 580 | ||
8 | 8 Andromedae | 4.82 | 655 | ||
ω | 48 | Omega Andromedae | 4.83 | 92.3 | |
b | 60 | 60 Andromedae | 4.84 | 557 | |
ξ | 46 | Xi Andromedae, Adhil | 4.88 | 196 |
|
τ | 53 | Tau Andromedae | 4.96 | 680 | |
ψ | 20 | Psi Andromedae | 4.97 | 1310 | |
χ | 52 | Chi Andromedae, Keun Nan Mun | 5.01 | 242 |
|
22 | 22 Andromedae | 5.01 | 1639 | ||
41 | 41 Andromedae | 5.04 | 106.4 | ||
2 | 2 Andromedae | 5.09 | 95.6 | ||
ρ | 27 | Rho Andromedae | 5.16 | 160 | |
64 | 64 Andromedae | 5.19 | 3507 | ||
28 | 28 Andromedae | 5.20 | 2297 | ||
14 | 14 Andromedae | 5.22 | 211.5 | ||
A | 49 | 49 Andromedae | 5.27 | 222 | |
4 | 4 Andromedae | 5.30 | |||
32 | 32 Andromedae | 5.30 | 260 | ||
c | 62 | 62 Andromedae | 5.31 | 224.7 | |
18 | 18 Andromedae | 5.35 | |||
55 | 55 Andromedae | 5.42 | 513.6 | ||
11 | 11 Andromedae | 5.44 | 197 | ||
36 | 36 Andromedae | 5.46 | 146.8 | ||
15 | 15 Andromedae | 5.55 | 236.52 | ||
63 | 63 Andromedae | 5.57 | |||
47 | 47 Andromedae | 5.60 | |||
44 | 44 Andromedae | 5.67 | |||
5 | 5 Andromedae | 5.68 | 157.3... | ||
56 | 56 Andromedae | 5.69 | |||
23 | 23 Andromedae | 5.71 | 137.56 | ||
13 | 13 Andromedae | 5.75 | |||
12 | 12 Andromedae | 5.77 | |||
45 | 45 Andromedae | 5.80 | 867.4... | ||
10 | 10 Andromedae | 5.81 | |||
6 | 6 Andromedae | 5.91 | 141 | ||
39 | 39 Andromedae | 5.95 | |||
9 | 9 Andromedae | 5.98 | |||
59 | 59 Andromedae | 6.09 | 272 | ||
26 | 26 Andromedae | 6.10 | |||
66 | 66 Andromedae | 6.16 | |||
HR 465, GY Andromedae | 6.36 | 455 |
| ||
59 | 59 Andromedae | 6.82 | 264 | ||
Groombridge 34, GQ Andromedae, GX Andromedae | 8.01 | 11.62 |
| ||
Ross 248 | 12.29 | 10.32 |
| ||
S Andromedae, Supernova 1885 | 2.9 million |
|
Requested move
List of stars in Andromeda → List of stars in the constellation Andromeda — "Andromeda" is highly ambiguous, since it's the name of a constellation and of a widely known galaxy, so a less ambiguous name should be used. — 76.66.195.63 (talk) 02:46, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
Survey
- Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with
*'''Support'''
or*'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with~~~~
. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
- Support. Definite improvement. I also notice that Andromeda is a long standing disambiguation page, supporting the claim that the current title is ambiguous. Andrewa (talk) 02:41, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
Discussion
- Any additional comments: