User talk:Haakon

Archives

Archive 1: 2004 – September 2006 Archive 2: September 2006 – November 2009

You removed my refs because you evaluated them to be spam. Under what conditions would you consider such references not spam. I am trying to understand better. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Knguyeniii (talk • contribs) 04:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is RTorrent. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RTorrent. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:21, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, just noticed you reverted the new slogan. I was not the one to make the edit, but the slogan you reverted is in the title of every page thus making it appear it is their new slogan. As for reference, any page on the pirate bay would suffice. Generally on Wikipedia if something is true but not referenced the correct course of action is to put the references in, not revert it. JeremyWJ (talk) 04:09, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see what you mean. I had in mind The Pirate Bay's tendency to change parts of their sites as a gimmick, such as their logo, and then change back after a little while. I also didn't think a reference to the Pirate Bay itself would be valid, as it's not independent of the subject, and it's not a tertiary source, but I suppose there's a point where common sense comes into play as well. Haakon (talk) 11:35, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RHUB is a notable company in the industry. I have carefully followed the templates and tone from other companies in the same industry, particularly ReadyTalk, which seems fully complying with Wikipedia. Please advise me what languages in the writing are considered as spam. Any edition from you would be very much appreciated. Please don't consider my RHUB article as a spam simply because someone else made a mistake in writing an article about RHUB.

Jmao1 (talk) 10:44, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notability has to be demonstrated through citations of significant sources. Haakon (talk) 10:51, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I added "Awards/Recognitions" as ReadyTalk does to improve the notability. Thank you for the feedback! Jmao1 (talk) 11:06, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have put my article

This user talk page or section is in a state of significant expansion or restructuring. You are welcome to assist in its construction by editing it as well. If this user talk page has not been edited in several days, please remove this template. If you are the editor who added this template and you are actively editing, please be sure to replace this template with {{in use}} during the active editing session. Click on the link for template parameters to use. This page was last edited by Jmao1 (talk | contribs) 14 years ago. (Update timer)

. I do need help from editors to make my article work. I have done everything I can by following a good Wikipedia article. Your assistance is much appreciated.

Jmao1 (talk) 11:20, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]